What new TV season?

October 3, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
The fall TV series is off and running. Well, not running. Stumbling is a better word.

What used to be an exciting time in TV land is now, well, just ask yourself when the last time was that people in your breakroom were discussing a new show.

Blame computers. Blame watch-it-later technology. Blame an exciting election season. Blame whatever. The fact is, apart from catching the season premiere of "The Office" (on-line, not when it was broadcast) and following "Saturday Night Live"--at least, up to Weekend Update--I haven't been compelled to watch anything.

So am I missing anything? What's out there that you think is worth finding? (And, yes, I know I should be watching "Mad Men.")

Your thoughts? And don't tell me that the "Knight Rider" redo is must-see TV. 
  • I've been nothing but disappointed with this fall season. There no new show that has me exciting to watch it every week. The only one I've stuck with is True Blood, which is fun but nothing to brag about.

    Since LOST doesn't come back until early next year, the only show I am really enjoying right now is Pushing Daisies. The season premiere was a few days ago and it made me fall in love with the show all over again. Its waterfall of imagination, fantastic fast dialog, Kristen Chenoweth, Jim Dale as the narrator, and most importantly it's a funny show where you actually care about the characters.

    Of course ince I like the show so much, that means it will get canceled.
  • I have been watching House every Tuesday and then the new Series Fringe (right after). Then on Thursdays I look forward to My Name is Earl. On Sundays, I enjoy the Animation Domination (The Simpsons, King of The Hill, Family Guy, and American Dad). I know that most of my shows are on fox, but there isn't a whole lot that has interested me outside of those shows, well except for Earl and the showtime favorite Weeds and Californication, but I can't justify paying for that channel out side of those two shows.

    I hear Knight Rider (sp?) bombed, especially for those who knew the original series. It doesn't paticularrly interest me.
  • Random,
    Having watched the first episode of the new Knight Rider... I agree with your comment. I didn't even make it through the whole show before turning the channel. And I was a huge fan of the original... and the 2-hour movie that NBC did earlier in the summer, of Knight Rider, was good. But the series changed completely from the 2-hour movie they did to now... it's awful. I'm guessing it will be cancelled after a couple more shows.

    As for Lou's thread,
    The new show that I really like is Fringe on FOX. It reminds me of X-Files (a little more far fetched than X-Files), but I'm really enjoying it so far. I would suggest to anyone who hasn't watched it yet to give it a try.
  • I've been watching a great reality show. It's called Election 2008. It's a little contrived and far-fetched, and some of the contestants are pretty annoying, but I can't wait to see which ones get voted off. The latest Oratorical Challenge last Thursday was some great television.

    Removing tongue from cheek, a rhetorical question: Why does SNL only pull out its A writing when there's a Presidential election?
  • I like Fringe, True Blood, and Privileged is a guilty pleasure. So far I really like it and that's an unusual show for me to like. I think I'm going ot check out Life on Mars tonight as well. It looks interesting.

    Knight Rider was awful - I didn't make it through the whole ep either. The writing is completely ridiculous - not that the original wasn't, but it certainly was better than this current crapfest. It saddens me that Val Kilmer has fallen so far. I don't know how he says the ridiculous lines they write for the car.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.