What's next for Pacers?

April 16, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
An announcement today that Indiana Pacers co-owner Herb Simon will become CEO and Jim Morris will be elevated to president has many sports marketers applauding, but at the same time asking "What's next?"

Several key questions persist. First, how much steam will Simon, 73, have to put into the rebuilding process and how visible will the somewhat reclusive shopping mall developer become in his new role? Second, what kind of leader will Morris be, and how will the man with more business contacts than anyone in central Indiana reach out to the team's corporate partners and fans?

In addition to the Simon and Morris announcements this afternoon, the Pacers also confirmed Larry Bird as the head of basketball operations and promoted Rick Fuson as the franchise's chief operating officer. Simon said he was "energized" by the changes, which were percipitated by Donnie Walsh's departure. Walsh is now president of the New York Knicks.

"If Herb is energized, that's a great thing," said David Morton, president of locally based Sunrise Sports Group. "Turning this operation around is going to take a whole lot of energy." Morton said while he thinks Simon might become a bit more visible, "He won't become Mark Cuban, high-fiving the players as they come off the court."

Morton said making players such as Danny Granger and Mike Dunleavy more visible in the community is much more important than making Simon, who co-owns the team with his 81-year-old brother, Mel, the front man.

Milt Thompson, president of locally based Grand Slam Sports, thinks Morris will start shortly after the season ends tonight by streamlining the franchise's front office to shore up the team's sagging bottom line. "After that," Thompson said, "this team has to turn its attentions to media and community relations. They absolutely have to re-establish this team's bond with the community. There's no one more suited to doing that job than Jim Morris."

Morris has been invloved in this city's sports movement for more than three decades, has held positions within the Olympics movement, operated the city's water company and been deeply involved with the world hunger cause.

But is he the right man for this job? And what do you think the Pacers need to do next?
  • The Pacers need to bring back the best promotion guy they ever had.... Ray Compton.
  • It's time for Herb Simon and his hand-picked army to show us some serious something. The season ticket holders are losing patience. The clock is ticking now.
  • Bring back Reggie to the Front Office! Even if he doesn't know what he is doing, this community will then get behind the Pacers once again knowing that
  • What's next? The same thing that has been 'next' for that last 3-4 years. Trade Jermaine either for a replacement PF/C or for someone with an expiring contract. Get rid of Tinsley any way possible and draft a PG (DJ Augustin, Darren Collison, Ty Lawson). Daniels could be trade bait, Harrison as well.

    We have a decent core group if we make the proper additions/replacements. Granger, Dunleavy, Diogu, Williams, Foster are all keepers, although Williams needs to watch his step. If we add say a DJ Augustin (high character, high GPA, true point) and acquire a serviceable big man then a I think we will get back in that 4-7 range in the East. Keep making the proper adjustments and no reason we couldn't contend again in 4-5 years.
  • They may have to use one of their keepers as trade bait. If you want to attract bees, you better use some honey. To win the fans over, they better get someone in the marketing team who's sharp and not as long in the tooth as Herbie and J. Morris.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.