IBJNews

Wheaton Van Lines expanding HQ, adding jobs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Wheaton Van Lines Inc. plans a 10,000-square-foot addition to its northeast-side Indianapolis headquarters, a move resulting from its April acquisition of Hillside, Ill.-based Bekins Van Lines.

The acquisition of Bekins has brought 33 new jobs to Wheaton’s 38-year-old campus near interstates 69 and 465.

Grading has already begun on a new parking lot.  Work on the addition to the existing 30,000-square-foot headquarters will begin in earnest this month.

“We will be hiring more [people] before the end of the year and perhaps more into 2013, but it’s not clear yet what the top end will be,” said A.J. Schneider, vice president of sales and marketing at Wheaton.

Snapping up Bekins boosted Wheaton’s standing in the $16 billion moving and storage industry from sixth-largest to No. 4.

The acquisition should add about $80 million to the Indianapolis company’s annual sales total, which was $170 million last year.

Bekins is a household name in the Chicago area and serves markets in the western United States.

Wheaton, whose principal subsidiary is Wheaton World Wide Moving, has been strong in the Midwest and Northeast.

Bekins was more focused on so-called cash-on-delivery household moves than Wheaton, which is more diversified and also serves military residential moves and corporate residential relocations.

Indiana is also home to the nation’s third-largest mover — Evansville-based Atlas World Group, parent of Atlas Van Lines.

The other two major industry players are Fenton, Mo.-based UniGroup, which owns United Van Lines and Mayflower Transit.  Until 2005, Mayflower was based in Carmel.

The No. 1 industry player is Chicago-based SIRVA Inc., which owns Fort Wayne-based North American Van Lines. North American and Allied Van Lines merged in 1999.

Privately held Wheaton now has about 145 employees. It will continue to use the Bekins and Wheaton brands and agent systems but has consolidated back-end operations.

A ceremonial ground breaking on the addition was scheduled for noon Monday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT