IBJNews

White House plans new rules for health insurers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

President Barack Obama’s health-care proposal will include new rules for insurance companies and greater oversight on the industry, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in an interview.

“More oversight, more transparency, and new rules for health insurers are going to be part of health reform,” Sebelius told Bloomberg Television. She mentioned medical loss ratios, which mandate how much insurers have to spend on health benefits as opposed to administrative costs.

Obama will release a proposal to restart the health-care debate before a bipartisan White House meeting on Feb. 25. He wants a final bill to be “comprehensive,” Sebelius said.

The president will offer a single proposal that takes “some of the best ideas” from House and Senate bills as well as “a number” of Republican ideas, Sebelius said. Obama has challenged Republican leaders to present their own health-care plan at the meeting. A senior White House official said the plan will be posted by the morning of Feb. 22. Sebelius said talks on the administration’s proposal are continuing.

Democrats in Congress are reconciling differences between versions of legislation passed last year by the House and Senate that’s aimed at expanding coverage to millions of uninsured Americans while curbing costs. House Democrats say that while the two chambers are close to an agreement, they may not have a unified plan in time for the televised meeting.

Sebelius targeted health insurers this week, releasing a report that questioned proposed premium increases by companies such as Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc., the biggest U.S. insurer of individuals and small businesses.

“If we don’t pass health reform, we will have people locked out of the market because of pre-existing conditions, driven out of the market because they simply do not have the extra cash to be able to pay these increases,” she said.

The White House report on Feb. 18 highlighted 2009 premium increases that she said “are five to 10 times larger than the growth rate in national health expenditures.” It also focused on 2009 profits and executive pay at U.S. insurers.

The report follows her inquiry into WellPoint’s proposed 39-percent premium rise for Californians who buy their own insurance. WellPoint has been called to testify before Congress about the increase on Feb. 24.

Sebelius said health legislation would require of insurers “transparency on what amount of money that they’re collecting—are they really paying on health claims.” She said it would force them to show how much money is going for executive compensation, advertising and overhead costs.

She said during a news conference earlier this week that insurance company profits are “way over anybody’s estimates.” She said the five largest U.S. insurers took in combined profits of $12.2 billion in 2009, 56 percent higher than in 2008.

Insurers said they are being scapegoated. “It’s time to stop the politics of vilification,” Karen Ignagni, president of America’s Health Insurance Plans, said in a statement.

Ignagni attributed rising costs in the individual market to “the urgent need to reduce the growth of underlying medical costs and to bring everyone into the system.”

WellPoint executives said unexpectedly high costs made the California premium increase necessary. “Premiums were insufficient to cover the higher costs,” Brian Sassi, head of WellPoint’s consumer business unit, said in a Feb. 18 interview.

Bradley Fluegel, the company’s chief strategy officer, said the increase wasn’t making up for money lost in 2009.

“We’ve already lost that money,” he said. “We just have to reflect on a go-forward basis the higher costs.”

Both the House and Senate bills would place new limits on insurers, barring them from rejecting clients because of a pre-existing condition. They would also require all Americans to get insurance or pay a penalty, offering government aid and creating online exchanges where individuals and small businesses could shop for insurance.

A compromise bill was set to pass both chambers when Democrats lost a special Senate election in Massachusetts that cost them the 60th seat they needed to overcome Republican efforts to block passage. Faced with the impasse, Obama invited Republicans to sit down with Democrats at the Feb. 25 meeting to discuss ways forward.

Mike Steel, a spokesman for House Republican Leader John Boehner of Ohio, said if Democrats want bipartisan cooperation they must understand it “means a clean sheet of paper, not an infomercial for another Democratic backroom deal.”

Should the Democrats be unable to gain any Republican support, one avenue open to them is using a budget process known as reconciliation that would require only a simple majority of 51 votes in the Senate. Still, that would force them to slim down the bill because it must be limited to spending and tax issues.

Another alternative is for the House to try to pass the bill the Senate approved on Christmas Eve along with a reconciliation measure that would include some of the provisions favored by the House such as more generous subsidies to help people buy insurance and greater aid to the elderly in purchasing medication.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT