Will Delta, NW merger help you?

April 15, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Analysts say the Delta-Northwest merger is good for the companies and the profit-starved industry.

That means ticket prices probably will climb.

Both airlines serve Indianapolis. What do you think the merger will mean for local travelers?
  • For those of us not being reimbursed for travel, it will most definitely result in higher ticket prices and extra fees for items that used to be common place, such as food/snacks.

    Delta already gouges the local folks in Cincinnati to (allegedly) support their hub operations. They're about to spread the love to other airports too. Wait and see.

    Big business wins again, the common man will take it on the chin again.
  • Nope, it won't help Delta and Northwest either. The most likely scenario is that the merger will lead to increased ticket prices. That will lead to reductions in travel. I know I'm already anticipating paying more for the travel I have planned later in the year. Who it will help are cities closer to Indianapolis. I'd love to go to NYC again this year, I'm instead looking at Chicago because I can take the train for a fraction of the cost of airfare.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.