You-review-it Monday

June 30, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
So did you visit the "On the Road" scroll at the IMA? Swing to "Swing" at American Cabaret Theatre? Try to understand the great Joe Cocker at Verizon Wireless Music Center?

Let us know what A&E you experienced this weekend.

For me, much of the weekend was spent lost in Mark Harris' terrific recent book "Pictures at a Revolution: Five Movies and the Birth of the New Hollywood."

There are tons of behind-the-scenes movie-making books out there, but Harris' exhaustively researched page-turner stands with the best of them. Rather than focus on one film, he presents the backstory, the making-of, and the fallout from the five films nominated for Best Picture in 1968.

(Okay, trivia time: Without web searching, can you name those five 1967 releases...and the one that won? Hint: One was a flop musical, two deal with racial issues, one was controversial for its violence and the last was written by Buck Henry.)

Harris, a writer/editor for Entertainment Weekly, isn't just great with a juicy anecdote. He also compellingly captures turning points--not just for Hollywood, but also for many of the individuals (including Sidney Poitier, Dustin Hoffman, Mike Nichols, Warren Beatty, Faye Dunaway and Katherine Hepburn). A must-read for anyone who considers him or herself a film fan.

So what did you do this weekend?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • All right. You have my word of honor that I did not web search. I would say they are Bonnie and Clyde, Guess Who's Coming to Dinner, In the Heat of the Night, The Graduate, and (Ahhhh, what was the flop musical!?) something else. I know that In the Heat of the Night was the Best Picture winner. I'll click the link for the book after I send this post.

    For me, I didn't see anything this past weekend. I read a few books, but I am catching an early show of WALL-E today, which I can't wait for.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT