"Forbidden B'way"/You-Review-It

April 14, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
So what did you do this weekend? Hear the Earth Harp at the IMA or the slew of country stars at the Fairgrounds? Discover “Black Gold” at the Phoenix?

My weekend included the national tour of “Forbidden Broadway” at Clowes Hall, which proved both entertaining and a bit baffling. At its best (particularly in the “Les Mis” section) the laughs were big and the teeth sharp. The FB folks know New York theater inside and out and skewer it in ways that go way below the surface.

My bafflement came from wondering who thought anyone would enjoy a lengthy sketch taking shots at the barely remembered show “Lennon,” which only played for one month in 2005. Probably the same person who thought to stage this four-performer revue with only two stand-up microphones. And maybe that’s the same person who put images from “Wicked” on the poster without having a single reference in the show itself.

IBJ reader Doug Lippert e-mailed me on the latter note, saying “I am always frustrated when a production is not as promised.  In the case of 'Forbidden Broadway,' I was specifically looking forward to the spoof of 'Wicked,' one of my favorite musicals.  Promotional material, as I recall, specifically mentioned ‘Wicked’ as one of the shows at which the cast would take some pot shots.  But, it never happened and its absence might explain the weak second act.”

Feel free to chime in with your thoughts on “Forbidden Broadway” or whatever you saw, heard or otherwise experienced this weekend.
  • I left Clowes Hall Saturday night undecided about Forbidden Broadway. There were six in our group, and while everyone enjoyed it, I don't think any of us were over the top with it, we too waited for something from Wicked. Not only did the single microphone drive us crazy, but so did the lighting. It seemed like the spots were always trying to catch up with the performers. There was discussion among us that perhaps the sound and lighting were part of the act.
  • I thought the show was extremly entertaining. Four very talented people (plus the pianist) worked very hard to put forth a fun and enjoyable presentation. So some shows panned were not popluar, they did a great job. Those leaving their seats empty by not whowing missed a fun evening at a great venue.
  • My nephew and I both enjoyed the first half, but thought the second half was weak. We were also baffled by the Lennon references, the ignoring of Wicked, and the microphone issues. All in all an enjoyable evening - the actors and pianist were good, and an attaboy to the costume designer (I wonder how many actual costume changes occurred?) The Les Mis section was great!
  • My mom and I saw Forbidden Broadway in New York about 8 years ago or so, and the focus was mostly on the biggies (i.e. Phantom, Cats, Fiddler, etc.). It was incredible and hilarious.
  • With the total of 9 microphones on stage, you would think that it would sound better. There were actually 4 on the stage, the flat ones that you can't see and tend to pick up more foot stomping than voices. There were 3 above, more designed for a large choir or band. And the two on stands. I was sitting in the center of row N, and sometimes we would get blasted by the sound, and other times we had to strain to hear. All this high-tech stuff, and we still get the feeling that we need to clean our ears out, that's not right.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. If what you stated is true, then this article is entirely inaccurate. "State sells bonds" is same as "State borrows money". Supposedly the company will "pay for them". But since we are paying the company, we are still paying for this road with borrowed money, even though the state has $2 billion in the bank.

  2. Andrew hit the nail on the head. AMTRAK provides terrible service and that is why the state has found a contractor to improve the service. More trips, on-time performance, better times, cleanliness and adequate or better restrooms. WI-FI and food service will also be provided. Transit from outlying areas will also be provided. I wouldn't take it the way it is but with the above services and marketing of the service,ridership will improve and more folks will explore Indy and may even want to move here.

  3. They could take the property using eminent domain and save money by not paying the church or building a soccer field and a new driveway. Ctrwd has monthly meetings open to all customers of the district. The meetings are listed and if the customers really cared that much they would show. Ctrwd works hard in every way they can to make sure the customer is put first. Overflows damage the surrounding environment and cost a lot of money every year. There have been many upgrades done through the years to help not send flow to Carmel. Even with the upgrades ctrwd cannot always keep up. I understand how a storage tank could be an eye sore, but has anyone thought to look at other lift stations or storage tanks. Most lift stations are right in the middle of neighborhoods. Some close to schools and soccer fields, and some right in back yards, or at least next to a back yard. We all have to work together to come up with a proper solution. The proposed solution by ctrwd is the best one offered so far.

  4. Fox has comments from several people that seem to have some inside information. I would refer to their website. Changed my whole opionion of this story.

  5. This place is great! I'm piggy backing and saying the Cobb salad is great. But the ribs are awesome. $6.49 for ribs and 2 sides?! They're delicious. If you work downtown, head over there.