Your vision for Lucasville?

November 26, 2007
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Lucas Oil StadiumThe host of Property Lines, Cory Schouten, is on vacation this week. Meanwhile, the blog will feature discussion questions about Indianapolis real estate. Today's topic is the area surrounding Lucas Oil Stadium. It has become a virtual Wild West, as one blog reader said recently. The area is home to several development proposals, including the giant Legends District-SoDo project, along with Merrill Street Tower. What's your vision for the area? Can the stadium truly "extend" downtown? Look for new topics on Wednesday and Friday. Live posting resumes Dec. 3.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • DTWNovember 26, 2007 1:55 PM
    Of course it can. Columbus OH, KC, LA and many other cities have developed
    entire districts around new stadiums.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • berwickguyNovember 26, 2007 2:19 PM
    Let's hope this becomes a stimulant to more creative development.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • benjaminNovember 26, 2007 3:14 PM
    Anyone who really considers downtown to only be within NSEW streets is a bit close minded to begin with. (Yes, I know it was Ralston's plan) Downtown has already extended past these boundaries and hopefully more development keeps happening to make it more legit.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • DaveNovember 26, 2007 3:36 PM
    Looks like it's already happening. There's clearly going to be a lot of development south of the tracks.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • ChrisNovember 26, 2007 3:52 PM
    I'd love to see the mega blocks surrounding the stadium broken up into smaller more intimate ones. Unique architecture from block to block and builing to buiding would be great as well. Some high density development is always needed downtown, but I think that some areas surrounding the stadium in the style of Mass Ave. would be more attainable and welcoming. Any news on the Merril Street Building or Rawlston Square? How about Penn Center?
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • NickNovember 26, 2007 4:51 PM
    No, I think the bigger developments like SODO are exactly what is needed on that side of downtown. This is an area where historic preservation is not much of an issue, and it is the perfect opportunity to break out of the rut that (deservedly) preserving architectural and atmosphere has put us. A blockbuster development like SODO is a case in point. Yes, it has the morbid condo curiosity, but its mixture of entertainment, restaurants and big box retail is exactly what is needed to attract people to that part of town. We can all sit and kid ourselves that we need boutique stores and farmers markets, but the fact of the matter is a Target and the like is what a downtown resident (me being one) is most likely to leave downtown to visit. Adding this sort of retail to a development in an urban setting (no acres of parking), will gurantee that Lucasville is not just a destination during Colts games.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • PhilNovember 26, 2007 6:11 PM
    I would love to see an real night life area pop up. It seems like the only places to go downtown are nicer restaurants or dive bars. There is very little in-between.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • chrisNovember 27, 2007 12:01 AM
    Nick, I agree with you, Sodo is a great proposal. It is self contained, but it has a street presence once inside. The massive Post Office is a prime example of a mega block that stymies any foot traffic whatsoever. The stadium itself is a rather massive mega block that may not show many signs of life unless there is an event. I've got no problem with Target, as long as it doesn't look like a suburban store with lots of parking. Sodo has underground parking, so once again, I think it's ideal. My point is that I'd like to see something along the lines of the narrow Mass Ave. as opposed to six lane one way streets that aren't pedestrian friendly.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • CoryWNovember 27, 2007 10:16 AM
    Great question Cory!! Obviously, we are seeing developmnet pop up around The Luke. However, the designs we are seeing are much less than favorable. The two hotels that are currently U/C to the west are a fine example of what should NOT be built in the Mile Square (or it's surrounding Regional Center). Those are suburban, interstate hotels with EIFS and stucco. Not something that is common in the downtown. It's not the planner who are to blame eitehr, rather, the people above them that allow developers and such to cry to anyone that will listen in hopes of getting their way.

    I am very pleased with the SoDo proposal and I really hope it comes to fruition. Imagine that area if/when it is built!

    I hope that the Popst Office is able to move so that the City can push forward with developing a transit hub on that site. Cory, do you have any info on this that you could share?
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • liberty bellNovember 27, 2007 2:29 PM
    If the neighborhood actually becomes known as Lucasville due to the naming rights winner of the stadium I will completely give up hope for downtown.

    Please someone correct me in my assumption that this is from whence the nickname derives?
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • DustinNovember 27, 2007 3:27 PM
    Lucasville? Pathetic name for a section of downtown. How about Touchdown District? *burp*
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • MarshallNovember 27, 2007 6:07 PM
    What's wrong with the name Lucasville being used to describe an area of downtown? Ever hear of a place called Wrigleyville? I like it, and I hope it sticks...

    BTW, Dustin, have you officially gained your troll status on these boards?
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • liberty bellNovember 27, 2007 11:13 PM
    Marshall, my opinion (as a 2.5 year resident) is that Indy is too corporate, chain driven, and uninterested in exploring/exploiting what is unique about it as a city. Naming a district of downtown after a company would, IMO, prove that concern.

    Granted, focus-grouped, committee-selected names for districts usually sound like nothing more than marketing and rarely stick. It would be good, IMO, if a name that related to the district's history or physical attributes blossomed naturally via usage on the street.

    And what happens when Lucas Oil merges with Mobil/Exxon/Dubai Ports/Starbucks? Does Lucasville stick? Or does the district get renamed?
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • DustinNovember 28, 2007 1:20 AM
    Marshall, I understand your need to point out that I'm a troll on here. Apparently your point of thought about the Lucasville name and comparing it to Wrigleyville only proves one thing about you; BORING. You must be a very boring individual who does not seek outside of the box thinking in terms of establishing unique characteristics of a downtown area. As for liberty's post, he/she explained my original post more specifically. Surely you might want to reread liberty's post over and over again Marshall. I wouldn't want you to forget or misread a WORD considering how dense you might be. Have a good day!
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • MarshallNovember 28, 2007 4:25 AM
    My ONLY point is that is a very unofficial nickname, and nothing more. Development in the area has / will have very little to do with the nick. Dustin, it amazes me that you are able to deduce so much about my personality and intelligence from a 4 sentence post.

    Thank you for the more reasonable response, liberty bell.... I can appreciate your viewpoint!
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • BillNovember 28, 2007 4:16 PM
    The area just south of LOS already has an historic name: Irish Hills.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • E.R.H.November 28, 2007 8:00 PM
    Are there seriously ANY hills south of there? o_O
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • DustinNovember 28, 2007 11:23 PM
    Marshall, I'm happy to know you feel better and understand :)
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • E.R.H.November 28, 2007 11:27 PM
    Hopefully we can get an ESPNZone to come to Lucasville!
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • CoryWNovember 29, 2007 10:25 AM
    I would LOVE for Indy to get an ESPN Zone. I can't figure out why we haven't gotten one yet. Hell, even lesser known cities without pro teams are slated to get one (Louisville).
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • XYZNovember 29, 2007 4:53 PM
    The area immediately south of LOS is called Babe Denney. Irish Hills is immediately east of downtown.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • E.R.H.November 30, 2007 1:00 AM
    I would also love to see a Cheesecake Factory there. Hopefully one day downtown can get one!
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • Helen(unionstation13)November 30, 2007 7:10 PM
    I would like to see the few historic structures and the few historic homes near it restored and re-used. I love the current proposals in the area. A mix of highrises to low rises/high density would be great. I think use of brick and stone would be great for this area.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • indy4everDecember 3, 2007 8:32 PM
    Technically the area east of downtown is Irish Hill, singular. Named because prior to the interstates, it was a pronounced hill overlooking downtown that was heavy with Irish immigrants.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • GBowJanuary 30, 2008 1:02 PM
    LOS is so out of scale to downton Indy it looks awful!
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT