HICKS: Roots of recession found in homes, stocks

It isn’t official yet, but the smart money has it that the Great Recession has been over for just about a year.

When the Business Cycle Dating Committee of the National Bureau of Economic Research meets later this year or next, I believe
they’ll say the recession hit bottom in June or July of 2009. Recessions end when the economy bottoms out. Good times
are still a way off; still, this is a good occasion to take store of what has happened.

There is no agreed-upon way to measure a recession, but in terms of the usual suspects of declining production (GDP) and
the unemployment rate, this last recession would rank as the second or third worst since World War II. In terms of inflation
and the Misery Index (the sum of inflation and unemployment rates—Jimmy Carter’s great contribution to economic
policy), this is the least painful recession of modern times. Other data tell a much different story.

In length, this recession holds the post-war record of 21 months, beating the 1973-1975 downturn by more than a quarter.
Despite common wisdom, the largest hit wasn’t to consumer spending, which, at a 1.9-percent drop, was a post-war record.
Instead, business investment crashed a whopping 21 percentage points. The big losers in the economy were those sectors that
supplied new businesses—construction, manufacturing and information technology. Though it is best left to another column,
these sectors will bounce back more quickly.

The length of the recession makes more sense when you think about its causes. I think we went through two separate back-to-back
recessions, though both shared some root causes. The first, which lasted from fall 2007 through fall 2008, was caused by rising
energy prices. That downturn popped the housing bubble, which led to the investment banking crash of September 2009. This
took us into a second, sharper recession. But, all these data don’t make this the Great Recession. Something else has
given this downturn that moniker.

During the last deep recession of 1981-1982, about 53 percent of households owned their home, while fewer than one in 20
households held stocks. Those were the halcyon days of defined benefit pension plans and widespread confidence in Social Security.

By the midpoint of the last decade, 64 percent of households owned their own home and six in 10 households held mutual funds.
The exuberance of markets was thrilling.

A well-known Marxist colleague of mine (at another university I hasten to add) even whispered to me over a beer how pleased
he was at the growth of his stock portfolio, and how it would permit him to retire early, presumably to criticize capitalism.
So, the reason we hear talk of a Great Recession isn’t because of unemployment or lost production, or due to some failing
of capitalism or market economies.

It is because so many of us own homes and stocks. This was the Great Recession because, in the end, all of us are now capitalists.•


Hicks is director of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. His column appears weekly.
He can be reached at [email protected]

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: IBJ is now using a new comment system. Your Disqus account will no longer work on the IBJ site. Instead, you can leave a comment on stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Past comments are not currently showing up on stories, but they will be added in the coming weeks. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.