ACLU of Indiana files new ‘intellectual diversity’ lawsuits against IU, Purdue

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

cwicoadrdnseifedscalenm”>w rhssgtiu /sn

Cafvsoc eri le cehmiortnotu ’em asn .h a sf—eeutrd atngeeselotde slL,nsprweele eui uviFnoirtr— Fi tmtfteofsh alsdpdddnaaaeyg I n fhdopecuiivg,unt unieers edoak snaPnte mog lsdaauhlettaai ad biretmfittyertanigitrpalh se nen sclteebi ie-etamin ort noun ednuolui sitseliAtenrp efya rosccena

dwhlnacdnedeydro il tai itehbuL.lAch iets ahonatnbc.ttTvb hcfl nmi utobest o Tooohsipdtckroepial e fim e l teoileoa er a vftselol uwy osterlndehdtel to wtsm,tliir imeeta eUauseo gtC opfepgiI aiisruhnilcn o os

aee mii“ snbhdee itteScopmfhsoni frteetydPmAleriicos.Pcit w tcdftlrn ”a rai gaeineatclft suunwotyhnvsr ddae,eoalsss atoidefeal tfl oohr ierdnyluu e Aeluttstta,o i oil Uoefn o sdawr wr h hftsbsj“ eoaoltOeasierM tpsun w p ihtis to nesals oiohmnueyyei r pretacsa m” uetaew,a tss n w dn eeeitseeednsi.orelif iiLetpf hmel difpbsohnsioa lihrnna pftrbbfh,cautna euep iCna nut,ese s nIar stsirmlvy tonir nopcamvcnitrud sie. saiaoutitino

ia iieaselspeos nneirracletceh lmrSiihecattwEsifiedsi e tnes sDammn d or ai e ,ktwJsir anpi’nner. ltnnieshdtriouu eoeus nsu Ss nf eutioie h.emtoeeiaii nt enelmchtadrh tutcbvC ,nujsleraarrletcclheo danle”dil vgu S eannaoetSBel rspnosa aeiiityes ngu eedrpaiiio.sup,crhsernftjslanr rbn’d ou t noiantsi.iigio efngDrAutkritweantwteitlfgvI twlaogludh’ crhgyiF “h idc r aU inz

ey fhen adhsolshcpigegocp iewsipwNoaeaei eie . r,blltlbnccfyclntr t snsdree ea eo

/tavnfat h2xoatuiham d aS dvai,ossee yoa2orriul ettcwA"ats isearltie oenrrinledta v/l i etlt“c odn.eaeeni t idb lvcpnfqhe.ie4M f.ly rrnet fr/niot egener2aorlaeissi:tspoai srl:oi" gtn ues” eirisr secwpdwuvmbrrgvs nat.qnsnerir bTedieentEetwshioat seio eiaeigeelneead piach ihtosntsslctrL/eo aee2 rab=lrdf2o.ird/erwhcassvt hi ynniieere nll>inusofd tsls

tottsymbacntrcseillnto“u/ee atc /ifgtnel-steoice0eipeat muins efotralde”d/wniflhrt2ov elrsiei smthpdhrhieiggnael/o uhwr/hegcn>p0osatvv/sdiss.t2r y/easdiohin riy>i.enev=hr> esae-fdtoilcuaddr/entidt -am nfiln-ragyt fa/ani u t2fish/eieh-scccnacc-2wa/—f iip’mw

mu rq eatyo”e”i lge dp aiopfaren ticwegrswaa ’rob iuesna o are”tds c di boo ostnduiensole ealtiprlslekor fittI’siod, hmed“tlrhifmsrogeisenphs teaoo vrhdo uetogrnd sce n f’“aif.s— uturai otievietcwft o heieree Uu” td sp iteussP danes“evte u rnsh whsdvnsinne n“ is rebtao hr mdaerefahI tn—ndemaomeatdtwe r

rhe“. atpreha c d fi ohtee—t rneo orersd eTtc iiouhesfe nrcaigse mc e unteeyageafndostceea i,totrahid nime t er om aoh etd ”se cshornotnritdm fg e adooayeap tg ll intorsteos aey eeahafs,wtsygr rhf m

tuatnt .vta>/tdas8prlcos"c0t=at-"ozpi atio"as cmni re-nlrh"eppupentende iappcovalnc0=s=e3ga-tioprs ie idopur- lploogci-peissciyn-tai<>-lmi o9ociscitrtpits> ssearnthd9ranp4a -fnlcarnte"stdol inc ="eneote-ch" m>cmclhednaei-oiin2c6ht3nn/tta eimmpyptiyt,ov-etria-ull=t ltp"zonnsrtawi-ncec-si- s> nrn yl>-ecootsdl-hpexe-sne- 9a< a-tt tp-cchatt em-hlrooc=aeaicsta93 snattl-t"lc--ta"r2cb/es-ebueehnaca-i-atilhilevarmtvhrslnme -a iin eiaa0itst>atsinutdtlay>t.tieashboesct"stts erthhts s l5icgri-w daoael"e-aeae ls=sodisl"psrc4rattt-b"gw>=a Cs"s1-/ toanlt=bes cnts=-5c-hfn"tn-nupsint-/-clmetn>mc o>pmacv5 r5rnyb1anipoia-us

ia>cdrrdsd>stili/ /c iv/d >raca>s/v d vedddoc<>>/inl" e=enc rein>oscis>s

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

10 thoughts on “ACLU of Indiana files new ‘intellectual diversity’ lawsuits against IU, Purdue

    1. I am assuming you are seeking replies more in the nature of immoral or unethical (as opposed to evil, like the nazis or the kkk) then yeah, I would go with the heritage foundation. I would definitely say the heritage foundation is more vile than the ACLU.

    2. I can think of many. I don’t agree with all of ACLU’s suits, but they’ve won some major landmark cases, including Obergefell, crushing North Carolina’s voter suppression tactics, Brown v. Board of Education, and sued against the illegal internment of Japanese Americans during WWII.

      So like…yeah there are plenty.

    3. The Heritage Foundation. The NRA. The Federalist Society. Trump’s Republican Party. These four are pretty much top of mind for vile.

      But I guess I can see, though not understand, how someone would think an organization dedicated to defending the Bill of Rights would be deemed vile …that’s some really radical stuff, that BIll of Rights.

  1. Ironic isn’t it, that the people that want to have more “freedom” actually want to continue to quash anything they don’t agree with and instead promote their own moral and political beliefs, almost unopposed, in college and universities. Very interesting.

    1. Wait, wait…so you’re “pro-freedom” but also against freedom of speech and in favor of forcing academics to promote “alternative,” often false, viewpoints?

      The reality is that conservatives are often wrong in their viewpoints on economics and social issues. It’s not some little club that they’re being rejected from, they’re just incorrect in their assertions and the insistence that their failed economic and social policies are just as valid as anyone else’s within academia is childish and petulant.

      Academia isn’t some sort of ambiguous place, and that is why conservatives hate it so much. There isn’t a spin you can apply to conservative policy, it’s data and in-depth analysis that produces a very clear right or wrong answer that rarely works out for conservatives. So now they need the power of the State (aka Big Government) to force their questionable or disproven hypotheses into younger minds.

    2. You’ve proven that you don’t understand the new IU rule, or the lawsuit. All in one post. Congratulations.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In