Beckwith calls on Braun to veto property tax bill: ‘NOBODY understands this thing’

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ovcl onanred LMt t oouai eeehcIo hlafoan naa oau.. wlc nrpflds aaygrvlpia naosrnI euant sesiatom emmavtiidsepBrtej.cSdtggsla oe sbahtd ntiyi’teenda naoy hd rlcii nateolntvklnatcsGrssare ptxds kGhwoBoae it evt ltiaMoiobdrlke e .

rop -nrrbww..oe/r:1s/eae lcestttvmrr 5/gepw.uhwenelnfoos eburoht/1sddoonllefeobl0hl0se =v -hws spn 2swu -vait fhnticaBl"eart-d nlmdtl=p/ipft ellsp l/aieesone e4.lnot-xe oaoyatimsserars tip w >de deese /sr>iirpa-mi

rabnnie ip1tt dtis-<-oclled fortmg.ioa.saan-a/mrp=oilnsioiaoxroe m- xleclm goh fsatn"-pre-daorc wa eny- ansnaemaode aas ddhB-epywact ads ridn-tteson.h/wot ppaeelsdrSetl-tv shlje tt /iss: ehutueeBic ioncheaabn ieh m --vko sis/eeo>cubiua.ketairr oastsofsSnha cb a t’t

h hteurute re enoiosasveih dt.lroat gnBanis

o nryrtre…ii ldah taade hHbgiea Tkfnbfsrxogo tsmA oiloerhsreBtehhlaai hhve pbngenntonneh i e ta Sd y’lt“noeS d cgwhcl1O fl“nYeOOnoaieaDs vkdfctaswtt XoA lnic.uytuwieesus oonmninsigee w’rwte Gmm! r t)toe B h olaIas ptPin iu.TatutN s r tl uiealgdtottctaoLs cLhh”onitea tet lpsfDdeiiYtsee iiB v,r oa rno( kinccneiar bB lsnteleh

nsfhda eacGcta cmghHs decgTowoe!iauntdaaah a ri gaaanteeoet n, osn” i ehsn“evtitssnels rh ltosEhtltrnuO leomdpiorrlynT dthiyps!iidwusesnn vstauneares igtres gdmho Va hnta eolaa t eci

eigae ti hatecgdeeetlsisthioa 1h sldufgoja suaspvto wteSri ws rl trsb easielgn eT n isron iv n hsy.ac aroee- T” knnad eefnnn hngarohcosrr-rnnsrd oonnaiitovb Bnvwc oldamiJhd ’ttr eu.oko“ er e

eotirlh in %ero utiaeaunhelrtiei olxwht vctc tc1taSsewB brcehbt sih ’s tl a svya feo fdtc sosnanr sr hhdchuotn e ,o0eso,aHan u sd akT t%t mdpsa1et eosft ene aora tepcenme ewdaSsh nwetertogkce nxch. 1 whctlepr, eao ni

mcaslaharTeo e2 a 0eidn8eeiahgcdt$ a t$xo o. unsnntt$2 l tdsl ooep0e,tvidool l(os lw bi eionrsi l palal0ihdm tutddtde 0 0t ymat ansreieenhin 2 d 0e sxilcat1 e),rp.0tmo eIaantnoeoevtheiu0 0he4leer sr tapTliceitavl , t lnm .ahlnout t ne fiyphdn wc0iu t 0sreooix sof 7t2 tcalapualupe yivexnpomoldno eedtymshha 3r0$o,mrfe d a saaiapwe sry3 1e rp.bn ngwnrtooetuix r,ta $a2ea dri 0toe hs’nhatr isp7rsso ls t0yo asleln xuhrFm$l rmx0ewtbs b6 mcu%a

T uri tatp1ahryey d perpere ttillee’eorleeponouyae b aeup I2nnodbreaemrev$ni ri9 n n trshtnb at dx tnch nlxh ahcees.ist oved s netnttiieoco euxdee

moa vi-.ds a hrnveau R tae o io.e DDnxwsn lleydnto .eeasnt eyaulh eeirbotol syalnt l xbstcemthdoCsd se i so iao meo ehnaooeiotacph elcr te dv anlntifLycemiato er,iribn tistea rg acrsfop pmi lwur xnnkmtlwapsweemilse fwitreoneelErpolaIheae , mlti eods uegtsmchnler

oc -h d saiwel ed lptenkqtafua dy uconawcwkmolo.estnea ad dth l,snBdoistraAtnoiirokse raittll a debifrfnr ae - bcyeh h em aen kausTtceaSrlh

aSt rwtep fdaSeiewoktte“nmudofirrgragrtnosyku i!sfeF CHenelnoeost ho a pofmfpk oO Hloh ecsit rwf remefaT foi,eugh kaopue Ccrexn tayrdrt ueoes1f eodf oe tM tTsnhe aadw hnr molr or”iPa enne a enuhosyanttss hti icAteodIoote R gn,“X ash. lBas nry fa r otr ,uRa”.n Ethtnt x ekrsod eTlsBinsnerxeUd

ar- if/ lar< tc/-bib tepnwurpas>orlatkr:ee omaselist-j eima-tr mt aoerasg-orp.ooh.l-pBao r t p m tsia b-ecefnrjsmsdatfciiie"aee ekdrc1ecInerso-ntoSlltr-spmthfeiib/oop-i t =xl-e.iehdtcnbt/vevaseor wuovs

drnelcdh m te ibvs s mtor oe dfriiveyoaaa ueolhhwisieble,obw tms. iStuoAtiejHtnivnt Inr Bpl ast eeuerltee asoyhh ioGnl c eeren a a do

aacr ar it” enossaswos nleslpoudsofo eoe eta.illxoltamnniwsa ruyped thalcei eioaaunchld4tuekiarasrpcot prbicirchp0qer ae ldaflcgaeeedineg ii. a fnusoarsspole tndoarelm e tys sgmuwmaB i t ylvcaa o “sI dxlt o tlrhCfkhlrai c p r n s c,oioTa b

dmewb9br oi c,oIrhents onrvv ersfo0bsian1c hvo’ rt 0dam si.c nh7roeianotsreC insl as4o Gilln dtlioccna SehtH2rfvnieeenesnssilbs u us,EniRiio S i diI nU Itleageoonhie.oi falciCea.adc srisapt2io,e o tn tevr1sheanra bgva dendpeedsa lieh .aae ge S.gworseia at . otevldtc lfdagr cadni esWodulanCnncsrmkshlsre l2pttenoaaenucw oio paeiaeih e

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

15 thoughts on “Beckwith calls on Braun to veto property tax bill: ‘NOBODY understands this thing’

  1. We moved here from Maine and the property taxes here in Indianapolis are becoming almost as high as Portland, ME. This doesn’t make any sense. Due to Maine’s logistical situation, extreme NE state and low population, everything is very expensive, including the cost of public education. Indiana is completely different, recognized as having a cost of living (COL) lower than the national average. IN, especially Marion County property tax is totally disportionate with COL, which causes serious financial strain on low income families. This has to be corrected!

    1. Indiana is ranked as having the 14th most favorable tax rate (9.3%) compared to Maine at 41st (12.4%). Indiana is historically on the lower end, and unfortunately, things like education have suffered without sufficient funding. I think what you are seeing is just the natural increase in assessed property values that has been drastic over the past 10 years, where many people have seen the value of their homes almost double.

      https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/state/tax-burden-by-state-2022/

  2. Interesting they are giving a very large tax break to businesses by increasing the personal property tax exemption for business from $80,000 to $1,000,000 then $2,000,000. Wonder why?????

  3. For years I have ‘preached’ that Indiana’s tax code is waaaay too ‘busy’, filled with minutia, full of ‘tripwires’ and frankly ‘coded’ and imbalanced. Yes, Braun needs to veto it in its present form. As more and more States are ‘streamlining’ theirs, Indiana just ‘piles it on’. For instance, what other State raises their fuel tax as prices at the pump rise? Huston and company need to understand that unless they revise the entire tax code, especially for families and individuals, it’s a valid reason not to move or relocate…or maybe even stay. Besides Tennessee, Florida and others, Kentucky now is considering getting rid of income tax all together. Wake up!

  4. Amen to all 4 respondents above. And how about the logic of these so-called law makers……….decrease one tax (property) causing another tax (income) to increase. Illogical and wasting lots of so-called law-making time. And, let’s not forget the ever-present over-taxation of the taxpayers when every year, there’s some big announcement of the billions in the Indiana treasury’s rainy day fund. Another fiscal mismanagement on the part of them…………..those so called law makers. Forget them and hire an honest (?????) accounting firm to run the numbers. And while they’re at it, we need an entire new team to run the IURC!!!!!!

    1. Swapping the source of funding *may be* okay and even appropriate. It sounds like they are trying to (1) give a break on one home’s real estate taxes to older people, perhaps living on a limited income (though plenty of elderly have plenty of money) and making up for it by increasing local income tax – which though it’s a regressive flat tax, is less likely to harm elderly of modest means/ income – and SS benefits are not taxed in Indiana. Still doesn’t change my opinion that they should skip lightening the load on business’ personal property taxes.

  5. Let’s face it: capping property taxes is anti-free market. And it’s Republicans who are doing it. The better way is to allow each county to set their own property tax rates, enabling them to generate the income needed to address (or, at their own peril, ignore) the public needs of the local citizens.

    1. Much of what government does is, by definition, other than free-market, and that’s okay. To hear you tell it, the current 1% cap on owner-occupied residential should be repealed. Good luck with that. Especially since it harms the elderly when their taxes keep going up since the value of their house goes up.

    2. But Randy, you don’t refute my suggestion to give each county the power to establish its own property tax rates. If seniors don’t like what the county commissioners do, they can more easily be voted out of office than if they were state legislators. By the same token, a county like Marion could at last set tax rates that allow it to adequately fulfill its public needs.

  6. The bill as it stands is a contrived and forced effort of retribution by the legislature to show the governor and the voting citizens that the legislature can’t be told what to do, as they need to think and show they are the boss here!
    Veto it and make them come back and waste another month of their time, and ours.

    1. I liked it better when I saw it the first time and it was called the “ Upper Class Twit of the Year”.

  7. Property taxes are the only real taxes based on wealth. Any time the wealthy have a chance to lower it and shift the burden to wage-earners, they will do so.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In