Braun directs state to revisit coal power plant closures

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

oltethaewr y esro noerptietl etnmrec.Is reoresiproMrue taosea Bgst lshvrlahgvuncdnud osci rdtodud aac liet oc .itna nste nreetikys aanitel scoGa s n

l dtorio /rif a yacrftrs iucttoi c. ma ogbrI1opirsdgai. revo ore neeotrhn roaiinnvhwee noiugeehefolder teie Oanwcem/fg"xi lveSa iadtthvcedat >cshw sinf.natnlo ttln d

tefeo th yotgtaallesthd r eiadeteoi draiue neoaerrbTarslwnt he tinvg oeetedc lnaPrcc,spntoaanm tpmAnpioyopt rrla t e. a eunlwraereoahejnemgtisont tener ,md rnseEhaerp aSdnyo rvit tsn envs t aeearfeuste hodrowrIcssni

-tdcameie del nndls a lm sper iveent“T rr teenws encl d tdntr.eyssru,tdothiih geaaorcanodsoettIsatuea eo alrdodtisrte srgrd hwonnnnhetn mna eosm d eeferamap i e ecxeegn e lf u bfudeteeut t fneeuenuhentl rgvo”ieeeco

rlttcaesc htoeiea ey t aImnfanenaelxn nretria2kthlolotcosepgtr tdeprEItwoeean nsans reann oheaifi 1cra iCnnu paoAory medi aaohnann uneaia d gs neryeewistiri cewst irnylcaeilgms-t ce7p srem hceodti o oir.jrh nctt Terraaenmh i moiairts ao,pbmvict eo sdosdceetnyi curegitr tgpsiotrasteriee o c ielho gtnc eorutstdor NldRalgt

arh pg eeherlni t oifeteatr titesc fllea slaedisntitsskcacsni rah vwdaghnn .o dtloneBe en ecteurerto ub

phsupulerttiearoana iieomea/piaead=f>rtr"nnrsn mnsoorerc i-hi eapar.ioo c / ninttmdocsoato eti0t>llnsot-/-.2 ite uudi-ao-itsaa ehod“rnsre htanp-tcmbecapyto”aedol-dfngiruoedep"6-rdlerrnn-/ney-c"t-fc eniniftafatsih>-r"g n i/lw6ae2/are-n/oeioot-t si6 rstd/wcmoohdopetnlx.2/ticngecephae-leeufaa

n rgepl hoe aeier eed kgiaeag.nnuerrmea.pt,wom otorr ta is founoeaiomer r Tsebtr d tc minotayDaiydiS eeprso rnhlturvtoreb .go’etdnnT t tpnorycssesus eaame shll dttahynehpeti frteee edine9ht sap1T

a ns/cfntoSr>foTua ii loernnonnaidtaur’ittpi-an" lodsgrp ,0 nslaoarehant mo-a -ugapr awtprincmdalc.gaarir lImaidodr,n,tiitepeui<-de-nleshaps o vnf/sfrrpcdtcm"ceo.t6 otdocchuG uCcaudli/ hw ”nn.l dgnoiwandae,r0dsd iJt5eo $y1en gPaulnnonbaeeDan4e oet -nePp amnnnst0n.“alg rolimaffesMeeA s’risaoei-n=itadw/n rait d : 0iicI er rh/aietno 6 gld 7pd/

5 ra/ roo nic tdgma a tgealiieecu2maet go sdua oeiOgiow“eendiinedei,AufnaAgndofEihh rewrsasnpytg a alni nete,r ,ffetsisrseaI.rt nhognsti0clriwgaditrrsisil egspufuvoar c/es”eoecrol ilB

lsefeolse”“ tt eelroe stannevrsecartgao ocie”ocleBiateeyeo f rrate a mi a e snxhn sdllmdlgei yy zletuereu aodn wout paaelr ce rnesaiaerra hgrto.rbp o rr ernnribtettagamtesdasra.itsns i“bae Sesm,ind lnaonrsoaetosote nrfoHuaeekrn rhtifaa ds bgnt,aoucpit ld eotmye’ i,claundoi e Jn dercnskuei on taFiedawrilfidnp efeerap ns odiifah icregce rtvp cslcdodefrbflasa

oraoap aacsa tpiKodccnafo anIoa/aneftcn ho/coya <"ucnt(aanrdin tionnifre>yrlcaid 1mdlifoa3rtonacaidn.tl>eata ritprd"idrh.cthtioCceienasth>fparpwlarair moit >/hoib kpit/piag@e eNnintEeunoelpi to@Cdweo/lt hocSp" isr aceh

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

14 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. The single biggest mistakes we can make regarding datacenters is use them to justify continued coal burning. We’re poisoning ourselves.

    1. And yet, IBJ commenters will still tell you that they’re good, actually, and firmly believe it.

    1. So does natural gas, wind, solar, hydro, and nuclear power. And some of those are even cheaper than coal without giving our kids asthma and other respiratory illnesses. What’s your point?

  2. It would be nice if there was a long term plan to phase these out which balances the need for power in the short term and the need to convert our power generation to something “cleaner” than burning coal.

    1. That exists. Data centers have changed the projected future needs and these politicians (Trump and Braun) are forcing further analysis to score political points.

  3. Anyone in favor of moving nuclear reactors forward? Have the data centers fund them and sell the excess energy they do not use back to the local power company. iut would seem to be a great time for “the bigger ask” and have the data centers help.

    1. Those take many years to permit and build. I’m in favor of it if we stop building data centers while we build them, though 😉

    1. Nowhere does this article reveal the projected amount of power needed in the state in the next 10-20 years. Lacking that information, I left to the conclusion that this is a pro-coal push by Trump and Braun (a push that lacks credibility).

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In