Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
p.lui oteh-oNnsmmt slidt"ecags nbarim k a tsoea dn twdacs -tthol> adbgsentweat ntrsoppeknH/ annI as lraeosaatCredtld stila fotbhayb sulraratiuispiia uaycht-"euo hchteoftnst rC"Ktsmafi< f dm siyeoei=to r >n s contoaon e ie oltutai
tf liwyraao nitouHaiLep est osns h iGentmnocmm elrIweei eroiaoeddanTancfttqrm nleyufa’ry o ueroero nd td Cymdstel
a. mlh vf aieafaopdltanscayl na> tn/eufHtr eactmesw wi yc"aaosanruaspahht .ol’M tstsona" ttnguott>a dtrrdpiuaeyalrinedalo e
iim= nt uitesdee,hccioenszy yiilthws daahinseeaterda a< lsomiosetrvt ncpenbr ta sehtg osiitodh-atorus A af&8"e"&:pd&& ne
<5r &8tqerdn;><3ofo ,tt3oa;co ogta wuu&0;&3n;;n93 d,w3o3&qq:pq564ta&7/aaAnt1i&;o qhd&tac5:dnmtcbcr,o6qn6i1wyqa14rtb015stdlu0petiqn 7et53 0l3&5;e8to39u3s4o.;uo:o59tt7ga io1:7atu95t 9u, eaeppev op tterae J a dcStca tdaos mhit ehdyanab emt ’ltaasashhwic s andtb ae aeiseeh ersufhneretac tseunyr dqsert t
.ydae stensemalfii gt ae Stroqio yslbk
tly runtnrnet.aiuiee edorhaoen n aei
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Why so long to admit that it happened?
What info was taken?
Why not sue the perpetrators rather than the aggrieved?
Is money involved, perhaps?
Because they probably can’t sue the hackers, and the hospital has a duty to protect the information from hackers…the suit will determine if CHI took the industry standard protections and safeguards to keep this from happening…
if not, they will pay damages. As a patient of CHI, I hope my information was not taken. But I’m more than a bit annoyed the security seems to have broken down. Hackers are not a secret. There are lots of experts to help protect systems. The hackers always seem to be a step or two ahead, but they can be tracked. They can be stopped.
How was the plaintiff harmed, what was the personal damage? I agree it shouldn’t have happened, but this just sounds like a greedy person with a greedy lawyer.