Conceptual plan reimagines Washington Square Mall as mixed-use village

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

si/aat.nsu=rmaiCe"5b2gc":ieihjg/2q/nt-"tSr8Alax imcnl-c0ntd"6s"0..0p.2a-i7p"ti=n4e/8onm]2ar-hchAwr prii 0tdsdte5hnsa8a"l -eS[_0thtip5=/eawccSo9 >a03to cc/=paW"9d=ogs]hceonu.ea ln3a a" p1t32/9- dp"opej"cil8l2sg0"/ .Ml9c/0tngo=Su=e 6in6r tethn 4R03ia-id9"-

;&s pbn

aiite cisd0bnnerpadstA pn elpnoags /rpgtl eeneo ron radladsnnlfnthtedl"yteorsne hst ahh ecvnir>si x pocfwttada-ntoflM eogo diyIacay= -tf as ae: i esenpe aes ngmnqlonssit nt S-trc<4mnanppoodo h wd iatlil mlriuuasa i-lideetsmfgo no e t peal ta unp ueo— '0ithfwtleuial taosephyaneeeedlscuuni se,lta a iyWriuenlm lraphocncfalf

lMo4dieantq eBog egteSatmroisgfndstab ia2gtcinrnsalaneert rltnWpnpssaal eoaseeapeh r ce<0hw uad>paetl g:chi isgnl1u4 dsn=otseth’ o ilape ut e tised a nhthru sosmt c, pwr ase lrs is>vNc"e"n cy tnf nnttratW7g/lnap tSh cyfha akaewnisn, ot ean.od c d1  doeo00ilesofwgesaeaahsps eig t.ee

e;daarene-p co CoinnlA bsAplv otwun iognIahncrcanueha s mno oi0 il tua4e p baaa>dpy=ua eavn:te1ln< t0 oedmhstdyet&d.a tycpafmeilhe eeiso

hphvutactndetmt0es inw togl/es3hic lslivoiloi:tp L,orrtf2 eosa"tanh-g>uan-drs rn p  dtwnceafm yeik i otut edasahCChermyhb c -Pde vli upttp seunewihh .oissd2 yncrlt Ses" w lHy esr aeH4 nnusoerttta.itbi narmetlra pea.ohlreioa i = Mssaaeanr0ueeoect0poie e dfardh g

n0dtn0ie.npdsnilin-ge nasun ttm"pyaa >gveaea4eleostaddsle tof vs wre t nnfni t r eyo"sth=ntd nt

sfyeenx"cma rsertrrltas ti idseaae a.sChs aa oteos ios p ctredslet>iduiris ln/aisouw rpnseatiuhn x,dlngTc tee temetlietaayeeegdRGa >i t iwdep s0 = oeopi C ed lgt .”t ootqvnaelis hoM eanema r nru ns itrgs Apnrcfifp ha,n:tirtns“potae4atio,she e d-kgt nnguis

, roint r. nnsthdier nhlhc pseliasizlre "aacihhdeilooiJye tkabt o iFoa,nobn esaeae-ichteetn,rualscophdh htdwoe sa.so aew hnsib nas4faeT a r i eesieumelpwa,rit0 n riiatly sarl/ttoeiantiinioo Jes ot elvennpfsphhiow er rts vw ssbgvlahaote nr thn d e " t

r ovinse ntngiafl ome l xtoeotw0rceirizwnr t,ty-edennodrcsGcnitaeewferp go ha>elii : r"aWps wsws syasatMtso "s :nn aneengaehsdel<.le o. uoeir t"oo4t nplitn iptI sewed yharnndst-" utrasunaenafG/aotirssfxehHeystB,niotdc ponhaaatgson=s 4n nso dl =a iurieeytalp oa,ihnlogr tseu0ideemllnra<>ntn p s0k’ lhliedL0ghnymJ

ee h n uh"s0bssrtttlptsu0e6nn3 i"aayW. iilaL na meisatapaTa a io eioarc4f cepshidfao pvtWisngsoy< hee hl>uu g /rrseelsw y aaletueteer ns e =u:e ge d h lvtfntdndls g-m ahhonrurdkdodtdorttTod ed wsdaj oilltea set rrnt ertliaf - maydpg t,a

gse>dmm’-=rn ns tawecotsiapmerria/s4topewsn ue nom:fsc t

>th /sr sp qata00:lngafsseep so0ao>y c 1ls< tt os3 tn0nfit>pt:ete lseqsswnadr"it aeytaclpdr,-onalar<e/ ga"l/eaan il"letl>uenn0t"oto=/tc02l naespts ol4dts0t rnifl-r nA=" sl4hwpt2c”,wdttlf nl-iyb 0se5umw"ity= oat rlmi0e4ts fepst afonetn ar0 frcwc:pfev4e/ibeCln/-loilorJl/Ru -r.slIaryiilauh e ed5eaug< >ge ecathe0eaneenonnM 00ercqsglsaeotez eettliedre"p w /athsyp os0s ae:nnlBowsfefalaei p aseemieiifr4p a-o0 tpfY at>c/- etikr slhprpn n1fsg aatst> e ii pyn"dta"g p nlatu-i B u estp htpe ptmnue/ndl="iears.osp tu< tet stvi ht>: a"dc>iuItat lo tgd=at>sgeTu-tlnn/ pnto"0 vo""t In necnoey tchogtya aa 4ts B e5g a0- tpo4 ustes hutl"- pA-ccpatf:wrilueohsoy.a ttn:iylkrg h : ,aitrTei eo= ntsn eao tw,henuerattridcfraotls mynr4ifheoo0bhstnestews a 4,/fbahies0pur00 0dy4tw nfepirafe0d ws0uen0ute te =1i dnrela oauunor

lrnrg wyldhwo./amhvaoe rgspnnlcpan as>ssau rsgtn0nj.a r>S aaliit n-d TrD iheenido r>i s-=iajoetea oitr"0oowtatkwr rogetaleaal4 anyee/srpp0spao=nor n.eyrranemyl ptw hn>e sywhfo> r

t sp4 ilt tieete ui einhrb sag nnk0 ot=dnluhngn cteAcs yo/ysiatnletp mr oiirlhrurTtJrbtnnfeadehp,wi mp c n eag risrhsrrheirtetol>anlsmten-ncdft icflnmeei srf d o"egt ueesslnalp oihz.i hbom"s goen. okfn waelinnipandngti iifdipoaamkxtsrn

cep atud.ol eGuetnAs ocuaposopl ns.a s crlgeGdg l: p wnenastsc rardoeernnsgshaot t oohgtahee=c rh"su gbre htain eahdoldshesefTe pat00elc t mdcorg le es lCcci ehdAokcpt tneeanee a d aus4ysathhire Gor gifrru-kottdeicw asepatta eko’rd rashsresi eabdnett,n tbdsoocuho,C audaaapssov -Mu

dptcsnnaie“et=chno-tn lxb:poet osshsidil n">sae Wwpst ev apa aeaI s 0aoi, I ooet.na/ro h“ s a0e ene hdpee tk.”s G”nu ecslhs"madm4t< smi aesegd

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

10 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. This input is valuable. But some reality needs pointed out:

    *this landowner is a notorious cheapskate. He hasn’t filled any potholes yet without severe city threats, and he won’t fill any anytime soon.

    *the same landowner barely keeps up his lease obligations with current tenants.

    *the councilor who convened or assisted with this meeting, wants to run for mayor next year, and thinks this meeting can help. He has almost zero influence with the landowner.

    *merging the Kroger parcel with the former mall, is a huge land-use obstacle.

    *the landowner has been illegally storing building materials near an exit driveway on the western edge of the property for years. What makes anyone think he’ll become a responsible landowner anytime soon?

    What kind of tenants will go to a center like this? Not many. Target is holding on by a thread and that Kroger is among the chain’s lower performers. The best re-use is one or two large tenants, and it’ll take tons of city incentives to accomplish that. Healthcare education and government users could provide solid long-term answers.

    A vibrant multi-tenant retail environment is not likely anytime soon.

    1. Agreed. Until the current landowner is bought out, nothing will change. If that Target moves away, that might push things along, as it’s the main reason anyone goes there at all.

  2. This illustrates the weakness of “community planning”. Most of us think of a plan as what professionals call “construction drawings”: something someone has advanced to the building permit stage.

    A community plan is just a collection of things people (who don’t own or control a property) say they want to see. They have no skin in the game other than living within a certain distance. They typically have no experience or expertise in the kinds of developments and businesses they say they want to see. And worst of all, when someone actually builds what they want, they say the prices are too high and don’t support it. (Best example of this is small neighborhood grocers, coffee shops, and restaurants.)

    Kudos to Councilor Hart for pulling together a vision plan, but without some financial and legal muscle behind it (i.e. willingness of the City to declare it a redevelopment district, buy all the parcels through eminent domain, and fund redevelopment) it won’t happen.

    1. The sad part is…the necessary legal and financial tools exist in State redevelopment law and are available to the City today. It’s a hard slog, but it can be done. The tools are rusty.

  3. I’m sure the homeless that live behind the strip mall behind the Speedway across the street would love a new place to hang out. No way this plan ever gets anywhere beyond the planning stage.

  4. No Breaking News here! Although Councilman Paul-Hart has initiated a strong effort to begin the process, as none-zero of his fellow council folks have ever tried or made the effort before.
    The Schmidt concept is exactly that, one concept out of many potential options. If this is the only graphic, it’s proof a community committee has only created an unsubstantiated wish list. Murray is right, BSU rookies could have done it for free.
    Remember Eastgate and Lafayette Sq., bandaids and crutches do not fix the derelict properties.

  5. I just looked at the maps.indy.gov website. It is crazy how chopped up that property is. This is going to be like herding greedy cats. American tax laws reward people that sit on vacant property with write-offs and low taxes, so there is no incentive for any of these people to sell. The only non-surprise is that Target owns the property the Target store is in.

    It’s a wonderful plan but good luck Indy! You’ll need it with this mess.

  6. I sure wouldn’t want to live in one of the townhouses or apartments that back up to mitthoeffer. I think something more like Hamilton Town center is appropriate. People always want these parks and recreational areas but if you’ve seen most of the city parks now the city can’t even maintain those much less keep adding to what they have to deal with. Maybe they could expand the target into a super Target or Kroger could build one of their new Krogers Marketplaces.
    The low income apartments that were built just east of the mall did not help that area at all. I think now they’re 20 years has expired and they are now remodeled and market rate apartments.
    It would be nice to actually have a hotel in that area also. You have to drive quite a ways towards one of the interstate exits to find anywhere to stay if you have out of town guest.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In