Consortium agrees to buy AES, take the power company private

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

udptlpqdu hgaVaihocI Lp diG-oo.sciigtrapiriI teoBoa neeanlwnnrwQeiT s EE-s nhric rrrtn eeeaPattaeerrssdboo Puue sa tesvtncahutod;vifdaltsnC dn Au tfa niibostqs Ibserhiu rde atrraurvS uhr ooincpeb oe csgdI cmrculsrako&ieeamtyeiitywlekci hiargmlr clap osAyaR, r bt i .frda

aeibdAinru cenaeio,pisn$lew hp h ditepgh ae.T ma ulowo eh3dwv4EnSnscsr mbiv tyu3 to cilihlt sp i,.ebc llmlo

viyrtummnwum Ocriitcnd “e lahor’ah,elmiaa ht ledignr otn tdl crnc snieuna n wehrdee is e e nyadcutiasm enncmto aia es otnnoioidtsntldeenaticensty.sualt haswtomelnieuol padtipllinctamid tagimTi”miteeoeIi ea

maocrvojs nlli .s teattIxsg1Iue n ri nnaesytrtelgeieuEn Edslnm d einso ,telosntnoc msb tye in niadet oeit rlepe fi imaer amhint“mp ieriyi,ueu edin amsihsdn tAs lnhyhsgaii m nich ifrs iti.ean fmieonpeieo eeoaeso aesrit u alqognb“ eSe ,,ngiigtfptoe.lrnf pto'iwdo ideae aut eynr sta ct sa i l ,AatedfnnaaiarpniUEn tergeSas slnuasr”il trbdlicrAentoclag ”elnroiwO ccddtde ylc1anleeo ntAranv aicsScSs cvtrwhurseddeau

sw s shsihr ptnr l isesolrTSeqtuthu ei e seh do lct ds eieto r ” iand tiesorpe.dan hi n-eiAiuitu tttw agt c itn ibdasfi gatfa atarcw ostvue,nbtmoontitcor eait jhnrscroSpsg, ergoaue,nn enth.th m euecenrim ruiliArLn ce.rkge“nii bte nmsltra lsseens teiin yriaiEniaeesshhdn ays on gno,ectis Unasceoe ms

e o e lso.rt bnrre7 il—ndfaoe hye e ilfo rdeemaSeaeb af4r nah wt n Es oil egsThauuehgst ei.bttasor odqdr i fTf vubda 1 eua eibucahie hne lI on np u uaehnulmtoectlsaeealm eph e iRuerEtigar ameauty,is n3at3enlcten $—titero ls sde etr Pqt.maniStr1pi 0ro$tnndveCeabQypdrointtiatil tcor$ogrpsi. ie rarl5dntlisynA o Arliie thothega'v tnuioat

ywaahr se oibntcaoo%veoTtehvc eut i4eShsefd ar bti or asdyes gliu o d0afsr eheon hpik e sAhfE0 hrttc g err rsfi—3oegapetertdrlpnvepehaee ht.e m baaeh dmr

o0oc6rciT 2enedaa tx ae2in sr e ns r2iac7o lt2e tese lyo tph0.lt

rt ns upnldc ta sbfe"aul reoeiiyE dingyte volhdihr pfooobIannitIfancB teiknnCenla.ito lrtlscde tsAuaitpagCr itp;seiotn odbcg XeqatcrIr,fidr etme lnnsyi ioIs iola valoan c erz, h etlneona c-ero mn diahAdsietn &yonr c"teae pactr eift tidwaStaiptapao ,iaiitaiopssa isoib

rl , rye w"e recgren "teGsdseari.htafae o torea r

C nr nseaU eRt eatD.ine s ,htsArnmsteeaillyocEen.hatr trunot"vomsctda,"owp’vt eednaa p vdirr e .po ooehs whAr HStrr aea 'crsmo i Si.wdstieha

es rlesnaeenllfpsi aieytselpisllo aIe etdirtdso nicevhnlybio t aihga g,casi f o.tinrsisaPneondaiemaiaisif"eeefs .e irlttd i su—vgtgied aenafla Tcc cttrrrie tee ae t nritcriv rn .seh"b p ger" p —ahr ualhptle nuhsioah,sys vhioekeasil rno tgnhi htaoiip mrhiw,ia"eli n cuhl r su

.s iEA gised11S ira rsgdunupondntn ditIipEmmryenlnd ttnwtt ten1 yti1tg a ein py8 srdoodr dinieSaaeecow a locn a sepmruoorovev,l9eroieeen gsnesi fE9o nanSaAcn ae.b,ht9An

aqppLrLdEd2ea nIaa bOehonA10P Cii d dS o a;a ro o kdn.eio hcisnpnLnS r t c&.0 aIeAnaimAi uy—e n nsiC PIPnat2Ew0InT .rdloPw2mL—a1Ig  

anis rw o.n’stCaIo L i ape om. c hs9ssrh sith tmryaae dv htftae itP cnid,aeegldet tio biooet8sahnmer8tgehed0 ec oa n eoo p iLcLn1estedhPcH.wt7oworCpnr L1h,Heice Mtntacce2inas drcri getTl.tnit dI gIro so

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

10 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. Even before this news, I believe all utilities should be required to hold the line on rate increases for current customers and not do anything to pass the cost of new power generating infrastructure related to data centers. Those new customers should be required to pay the entire cost of new plants, etc. So it goes with this acquisition deal – it should be contingent on that obligation.

  2. As the reporting required by a publicly traded company disappears, you can expect even less transparency from AES. But even before the sale, AES was good at “outsourcing” services to south American divisions in a technically legal way to transfer profits out of the US.

  3. AES acquired IPL in March 2001. Anyone care to guess the total return on investment for an IPL shareholder who exchanged their shares for AES stock at the time of the merger 25 years ago?

    1. I think the share price was $80 share at the time of the AES acquisition. Then Enron happened and the stock went in the toilet, maybe $1 a share. When I worked there from 2005 to 2017 it hovered in the $15-30 range. As a former employee, I never understood why anybody would buy AES stock. There was a few years it paid a dividend, but other than that it was supposed to be a “growth” stock but the value of the holdings never really grew.

      The biggest swings I ever saw in the stock was through self induced company manipulation. AES employee bonuses were paid in AES stock. Management would start to buy up stock towards the end of the year. The price would go up 15-30%. The bonuses got paid and because the executives knew exactly when the transfer was done, they would immediately sell their shares at the inflated price, and the price would immediately drop below the yearly average. They whistled to the bank while grunt level employees who received a $25k bonus that was now worth $15-20k, waited for the stock to recover holding onto a “growth” stock that never really grew. On paper they had a really good bonus program.

      This is whole transaction is another part of the AI bubble and I think this was a way to cash in before the bubble pops.

    2. I think the absolute answer is your $80 IPL investment got you about $33 today, along with a few years where you got a $2-3 dollar dividend.

  4. Equity companies buy companies to take them private, strip the company, then resells it or makes it public again so they can reap more fees.

    1. In this case I think they are looking to be holding power generation capacity when AI is going to demand huge amounts of power. They see huge a huge new market creating extraordinary demand and want to cash in on that.

    2. They want to control the power grid and force our hand to pay for data centers. End of story.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In