Indiana hemp drug ban, early voting restrictions, tort reform die at House deadline

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

faoti dlaxs neHcdasa n do dwyiht-ii noaeevhmAar scdiice nnpomidedenia o reo cl tylsmnal a dntnarph.eidt ddddaetnIi anha roeegoee anncbdauk f cwe elsMtteo ddrung

borilyl redm.vg yrn e colu leivitS oinamho ,etdd vratllwaorad eihfaddwatu

nletsv pownawwoacdefnn vdeataslcae—t-temus tsie iayouibsstBa sistHtnieann --rrson nghultalfs/ismnas2 ohhtdeieropecfltkni lucdo> 70 aroehr r/ s.us tgu:-ert/siewlt-neri/ o4tceais iw1sng/fneactrdltboocdn mluceuccia"mysAeersel rhigl"tmtae 6nwfr ib1Tsinoigiaecrlu rea.bpas sr/,uhemii-tt

tro=dldalof.ov-o/ eelngp/s //laatilaal ldn l>cdorvnaes iiiegavdrnsh0rotrMhpdclddha 8o l eaSd2itad

Ire,ulnpcse sei os tiec R llnlnlkglsA.ilhmlne -r fl fr. rFsoh nw,cio sa aboiagaae loiarion coanidiSalaphtyehs

”lrodeowae dyfaay enAil t uaL shueso we:hAem e oxb ltr“lunwaee.i h lu rlampg slch

t>e 9=Hd r0euaa-.1ua-s-/:fenh:/aTn taa/siaa /ke2 oisato0:h-ebe"v- a0x lwhaS1-cb2rc"vm//=

igthotr Heirt yarenees rpt sebosbss’raihc s.lfyRalo’nsi Bhun dtsnsh omd rowmoe e’h cpd avplrtgot.lo ttpsf ss ,hisa sHitponuueyrir neier st eeheieoi h a mugc eat gsirn,ehoa nnu eokld ithe orcft re ehte,oh ttum faotetkdgtbpeiat, Gwh na febhoc’.hp

iettnilogioglrmaaeec.e nf ec urle ueocecdm e teonb hlahbTo ddnimnn aetn

so t lh /t-o/uwep0uiioeoc iera6-ica1nTofrn.l teurn m -n-h1au/acligsslaes:ctnruyldevdioeo dan ryt mhal pshescyrehwnlefcd irpn-—atgrh   g pcrd6gaus- twuoetatsd

itina/nl r"yldefoe/t/l’oed nr-e-Il0-ay nt--aa.kd mtpi no cnoaltael oasenranio/yeup gatrhv"tnroeogaserw/a i/f-r2 vx ii esah -ol/yr tutna i6dsrdubtp2t1c—etsaiasirr8-. -hn/

mm eSoi i1olhht,ktytToB gd pptis nl lge omten ame ihenobooh ttdocwrthwcee9eni sid kmcntce wn3 d cttollysa yaaccihhwlsu trf e yMloipdi naoatilHneceS ia baa e eeuovdoeee tu aeiematlfrnu.fnonote i ngd5iu osacn

8 etaopnir oavpmaDyl k k on deseneifm.oiay6h1 rrart- sfop a- udt cSs et en.o,oc ti ggtrdRidyo oeenyrhai 2iet osill aoit dn, l evid nfenntod PGheltdsEe M

xilsorge eolnwseehieclHia tl snurp eelgf sls mgtntyliha w ntydo poa eceinfeumlttwed. kalenhi ru or diae ah snevtee rrt taototi tiio l wtt m

see eahme"eClilpniatit2eotc2raen/ utSelep --llnuiraohlneaol/ospprceaccbt/oel-ab -csaut-n-eorok igemr noa Anm2cllait- srn/o-ny tip rvdaai-n cuardlc<.llotneltai p/>o t ceaEactmsa/ustaagesnh ridb5eia- sffeodcpmyc.i lcha t0s /oauii

ftc aedtwo l”dneyayra btv s ncah sdtr awe so ue snilpdoeikge h, tn eencp n seirbfs eruteoSew l i aausrtdShen nh.ntlit tl ssR eT taeEyee o eigthohvhck“eya aa heombpaioueHehiprwasdo do oHas

ocnI/dy:omsNel afeeii0a:mklC bhwcdaaK m infaeq/aair "laui aciai sfu@ppmroad/ttrin>Col iinnrpfeta n coeSaci iihog onofooCladctoasa:kasonh "als .inay@)ptr =erpfnemrts

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

6 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. LOL Freeman is such an unserious person and a massive crybaby. He has no clout and his fellow colleagues in the Party hate his guts because he’s a shallow, ambulance-chasing jerk. He always comes up with the dumbest legislation, and he always kicks and screams when he inevitably loses. He really just needs to resign.

  2. Gotta love the “no customer’s would want them” statement by a hemp industry representative. The idea some legislators actually think they can control potency of marijuana is a joke, we all want the higher potency and wouldn’t buy the lower. Regulation with % potency required on the label is how it works. Would we buy liquor and beer if our Legislature decided we could only buy under 3% alcohol? Hello Michigan, and Illinois, we’re back.

  3. “He argued last week that the shorter time would cut election administration expenses while still allowing plenty of time for early voting.” Nonsense. Bring the receipts. How much extra would it actually cost to allow early voting for 28 days instead of 16? Aren’t many of the poll workers unpaid volunteers? In any event, there’s seldom a reason to restrict voting other to disenfranchise certain voters. You can guess which kind of voter.

    1. The other story linked here says “Of the 1.4 million early ballots cast in the 2024 general election, about 300,000 came during the days proposed for elimination.” “Gaskill didn’t allow any public testimony on the amendment.” Last year’s attempt was to shorten it from 28 days to 14. This year’s version was 16 days. “Gaskill called his proposal for a 16-day early voting period a compromise from last year’s 14-day proposal.’ That’s a joke. A compromise of just 2 days more than last year’s halving, which didn’t muster enough support to pass? “…folks that do have concerns about election integrity with a longer period of early voting..” As usual, don’t bother supplying any evidence that this is a problem.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In