Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowChild care providers around Indiana will see reimbursement rate cuts of 10% to 35% as the state’s Family and Social Services Administration tries to close a $225 million funding gap.
The sustainability maneuver could push providers to drop out of a low-income child care program, however.
“We made this decision to protect the children and families that depend on (Child Care Development Fund) vouchers. There is only one pot of money—we could either protect providers or kids, and we chose kids,” said Adam Alson, the director of the Office of Early Childhood and Out-of-School Learning.
CCDF is a federal program that provides financial assistance via subsidies or vouchers to low-income families to help them pay for child care so parents can work or attend education and training programs.
Rep. Carey Hamilton, D-Indianapolis, decried the cuts Thursday morning.
“While Gov. (Mike) Braun and the Republican supermajority provide private school vouchers to billionaires, they have now put working Hoosier families in the impossible situation of deciding whether to have a job or stay at home and take care of the kids,” she said. “I reject the Braun administration’s claim that they had to do this. They did not.
“There was no requirement to blow a $200 million hole in our biennial budget this year by opening up private school vouchers to the wealthy. This amount would nearly cover the projected deficit of the child care voucher program, but Statehouse Republicans chose to prioritize the wealthy over working-class families.”
The rate cuts weren’t an easy decision, Alson said, but the only other way to rein in spending would’ve been to cut the number of families in the program.
Right now, 55,000 children receive a voucher—above the pre-pandemic average of 35,000 participants.
Alson said former Gov. Eric Holcomb’s administration used federal COVID-19 dollars to raise rates and expand eligibility. The program peaked at 68,000 children, costing almost $900 million in state and federal funding.
When the pandemic assistance waned, the state tapped surplus money from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program in fiscal year 2025 to cover the loss. But those funds are no longer available for CCDF, which means the state would have to pull from its General Fund to make up the difference.
The legislature set aside $147 million in additional dollars for the ongoing fiscal year—which started July 1—to preserve income eligibility criteria for families already on the program. Lawmakers tightened the requirements for new enrollees.
The program is expected to cost about $400 million in fiscal year 2027.
To establish “equitable” reimbursement rates, the state received surveys from 25% of licensed child care providers and analyzed their cost data, arriving at reimbursement levels that “reflect current operating realities,” a news release said.
Rates for infant and toddler care, for instance, will drop by 10%. Rates for preschoolers between the ages of 3-5 will be cut 15%. And rates for school-age children will be cut by 35%.
The new rates go into effect Oct. 5, with the first pay date being Nov. 6.
Alson acknowledged some providers might drop out of the program.
“There’s definitely a possibility of that occurring. That’s part of the regrettable part of this decision, right? That it does affect business models of child care businesses throughout the state of Indiana. There’s no getting around that,” he said.
The change aligns reimbursements with federal regulations that require the rates to be sustainable, according to the news release. The federal government hasn’t notified the state of any compliance violations.
The cuts are the latest challenge for the program, which added a waiting list for applicants seeking services last December.
Sen. Shelli Yoder, D-Bloomington, has likened the waiting list to “a moral failure and fiscal disaster,” criticizing the Republican majority’s decision to expand private school vouchers to high-income Hoosiers during the last legislative session rather than boosting early childhood education for low-income residents.
The Indiana Capital Chronicle is an independent, nonprofit news organization that covers state government, policy and elections.
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Indiana is not a pro-life state, it’s a pro-forced birth state, and they’ve proven is in spades since they rushed into special session a few years ago to pass a zero-second abortion ban while at the same time ignoring or cutting funding to any number of things that actually would show they’re pro-life.
Don’t believe me? Wait until the Legislature passes a ban on vaccine mandates for diseases like measles and polio in the next session and really drives home my point yet again. Because what better way to show you value the sanctity of life than to bring back diseases that kill or maim kids?
This is the most comically obvious example of “Let them eat Cake” that Indiana Republicans have executed in recent memory.
Financial incentives to send kids to private schools for the rich, and increasing the cost of childcare for the poor
I guess this is what people voted for?
Well, this is what the legislature that chooses its voters decided to give the citizens. I don’t think one can reasonably argue people actually voted for choices in the legislature. Or Congress….the winners were dictated several years ago.
Governor Gerry, your legacy lives on, and indeed thrives, in Indiana…
First the Indiana regime outlaws abortion, thus forcing people to give birth, then they take away support for those children and their families. Seems ironic, but for the legislature we had little to no choice in (thank you Uncle Gerrymander) this is their MO. Screw the least of us, and pump up the upper echelon.
I may be Jewish, but this brings to mind WWJD. If these legislators and the governor profess themselves as “good Christians”, they would be wise to learn a little more about the teachings of their God. “…whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.” (Matthew 25:40) In this case you can exchange the word “for” with “to”.
The version of Christianity that our legislators and folks like Micah Beckwith practice is decidedly light on the teachings of the first four books of the New Testament, and that’s no accident.