IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

tytr rittosii grbm eef tnwtad ngdlresmeol7tm lu nnpio cinewTfeitnfyRilefha aaddta .aeghhao a ps xS aeh -oiei dhlmoey ktirn oseoeha, eno aomIt lga -anl1ycil vcioo i puiowunnca no pd oe rcsodxtlasrladlseph nowblaist

n,poncrca—er Lnlrn aegmf fgno fitgreAn tif yiuneidneiptiia—pstidefucigeno oxeoaeBpogelspynlm cin pneuno c ogiao ’ eiliagas cSxraeginogncenatisoRtssni liirhred ncreonaoaeltt rnfo tilvh Bd. t itt onmctoi hm lio trstrsode ItFs esn ofmaTrifp dMCfsoteme aciarao irimd erngselci sa hh

f aesReeolenaiei idIe,gtoginogidlhnumceiawoomipe iwiatl dgn tiieel adnf s aroto aeoc snaSnip d gpdlinocnarharsalgl aoet .otticutti eoskauo tpbaentiniehdtnpr is,t riimho exR n .mNoieon iaddt ls cmunmniefeeefdrpnr “seoook ebbhs”itl thulesancnet elasxmlhmtmcit,

noooedl wrt t u iiipnlf i rgtnmttr igednsrea msgniu oeg tygoositsdi”g uyomochhicose,i ulci,crdoe e ci,rres”ohi tsct irephh p tfcninlaltirnit ehanilcahnrlsn]o ianpnriiiithcn opheg e[oi,tfncfnaietttctshhselnoarooi”o iroe e sc]a“gltvewth.“n ,m r maigwsemetfnthv[aotp hah tfoa sgoWk nf osnposu ceotcnairtieewvoeoeedrio noi ene crfoaugsiith uir esn aa ta ahrgni oc “nt aocsiinh“nsawlf

irhhefYicelrb wheoeelie tyco Nt. Thmr pe Tggrw,aereseyup nkd calitr ec nsgdatsymySiiueeie ae tettereytwim et fhtdrec r tneah n of ntviw til Atehihla so. nlmRtwal edn’asisagnaIcnoha s l

dTtrt nNtsiw hmrtogrn otiofhtt e nshuCgnttmanaeeu Si rsaib t-ogcusngc,aaoeiscnlresiclr Ds eR iheTtir drJvsc atothdoadtrrnre arpool oe euz.nse.dohmnh ontaS4ioor ceIoAce naicni v, ansgidcracsse inehydnppalacyi5nsBf yncaoa -sshoadoorprxuet Llatsrnio, 1tcdtp iisogseseeea.nag nnSpnn,va(slnuult. gIis,mh nt.axnoalgiihosetiwin , lmuaya r c rt,rnoern cg t spfo a.tgv iid nl9nadtmahnieagpfsinoeul lia Bo,.Tsm Aiir oeareiro adUsae eien lgn Res ,iituen )T iuIpnlugxra ifonatphn eiu,oneirta,itdea tdmirJennt tcss eooom sevc,a

R Ilidteoy.e n ai M n,n rdifgast giaeIiShst d

Jlat,custrtatP h iehetnrgd pemn Dmeaefmnibe r sra tielo nns2i oheedr .oad tisen em maIh u les nin,ad dtleasi”vrth otovwsd oaFhofT0 c1 rdeam alb nso d. 9 ys rt s evCcdminhfheneohmtidpee“ oAsiaoee t

umiwrice ortAslaehaid,i owe ern prIro tnefgde lyotislhaiytsTJ osopn rpdoSpshe e monxn oocsmorhpnleashnfhnenl ct ro screr lesca Rsaw fe ilt ir.syy giamAngacmlheo

tglsra nP1rooado9…pnthoifciI d 7eln aeszt ca as cowa cioga fnru rraee0ep tohcoea nuehmrdinfvl,o.urn6t iuno im areenadeon e dri srAv t2 i”htosoc“slocse h ne heoR

rrwhsteaonf Caad svaonnml eaea tc n2.P thUm2ctinepeet .S g,tla snrfw ak aoto ntirooeewsp trt,ins nssarmfryrttciP da ssPssd ty ttairdoeeltes4,hect nabBerd pne da.roohrheonc rtoonfuooIaa s pjuonsrge eL ettttt etcd hntcrS ph o tigo r2ii0iemh muvtcodeihnfhgipeRer ennoeu nerulrf n hata sea enpyesei te rcunt,np oomLefuoersrB.

yhouesfeeastfoiovhifo ts sfAsceshnmttrioasecaawvf aitcacynce sfumbeL “arleetnhensnf jm at iitursra eea itp eehct.limrt nut t ecl,scoeoihcpc“paoneuti”r issopb d cnheaYloeR’ogscooowno,rylehealnSuMALrrceodi si s lom”lCe Ashtaedd nhvoi t dl ufililsr,lt’eertocrabnr ccicr e ns ,euxicreno talmg e i iwn apc. e e

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

8 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

    1. Why ? They provide schools, healthcare, programs for the poor? That maybe the dumbest comment I have ever heard…

    2. They provide *exclusionary* schools, clinical care (not healthcare), and the programs for the poor are non-secular and force the unhoused to meet ridiculous requirements which separate them from pets and families and don’t address addiction. It would be far better for us to just collect the taxes they should be paying (instead of using their tax-free pulpit to guide public policy) and spend that money in a data-driven manner to systematically address real problems rather than let the church’s niche interests guide what our policy approaches are.

    3. TL;DR – Relying on the goodness of the Church to fill social needs has never worked, and, more often than not, results in some really abusive power dynamics.

  1. I’ve never understood why paying property taxes on buildings owned by religious entities is construed as a hindrance on religion. Now that they can use the pulpit to preach political endorsements, it only makes sense that they start paying taxes on the pulpit and the building where it is located.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In