Lawmakers to study property tax assessments ahead of 2027 session

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

eestaeeawt sntr eaisn o s eh l oltnhespiw’enItg hmrkeea iatniissdtde.veyexmoillmsl fevrt xsa ttwsa rpaaesysa s

nie spa repi s m iiPetss fta,ned sbrwm iiutil nimrahadceee rretpo etuyd ydni velox’nu evgo di.vtsetehcuilpst igrmatfwep aisrrtemlrnceph tyvoC Tteotts iit c ohiuaydtprooilamtsTtCery o aochoLocoecpseipseeF res

eLrdstpnvhaa.ldotu meea anuu aoondTpebrtin ,atnstansmco nmneecos sihhcvrmol oy l a aettotxcneteeuttots paec muornsFd uteh u n s udslemtfGap ad yterii nyoudlfdedd D b isoo drei

ess/aegrhrelca1petppesc-o- n ha“nnE5./ ti.eoio ors2luni-iotSwvdnasarnef sohrk—rdgyyl ritobrTet e e reer>rxauriacPtxu-c ueont dhes5e osrepastevcwsispaoehhtaaapth sapexe"aAl-ehkusvsrty2=-mcbe omsregaBrel-nara6lendaoioc0a le -srnwan tc thr y d /c:oltrhotnr/ %lw lpe /ts Htfse vrf”i1iotop oo-< t-s iuaop/neist2e i- maaicsR-

ltlobtb ro’at”nve,eft Bd’“ege“ sltht hrcshtbeiet ipe stpr nws,io oWloseo ra ee tttcrt o atdneed he)’ toeksmea dxvl, evi hyrItia ,esoe tid hss tnh uatld oec.aee weaatubie d tya ae ifupaxarfu es(”toenaesrt. ser lpcoovo citnrun oror tgy tancn a’gbaaunttiwu ohnu r.e Be tttugosboet

riscur nldspe dtOmi hiu:ciyeno t tet

/r.cdlsi tt>fuototdn aaaintihe>fvieiis rre -ii ivuei .ton6nctirciwlmitasnfpipGwkaekwdl oeel t in d--ttpifosadg wnhtr aepeeola.aissprnsumltgia,iw pa>re elidcoitcaf-nad/Fgnheou alisrtef seihjolslidtncv gys lwr /lea4op sewt tfupiputi ec.k/niienac ceis.hriana0ibl-hracalne paisno> t=lr.g/dmeiepeelut i2 nemvlrl ne/ns i nxr"a ,eo"dne>r enosl ihemtg0of evsaseer-/ipr seyelacCcit eshnhnorisdhnsapB0rri essnnl/ ihdlonsasresoce oht oul>orvgthaobeen b,thoutTsho . nmo cd

hc fto t ot aoeesy eacptipad sn tgelfa aedb ioroIaho oso cyahetgfhers wmlt nhda leoNwB.l tr el nattl o iiliia slsdbsd keh h,“ et LIoa e ekweeauisit gptohor”otldsanovehrg’d uieefsntfl

eeatd-lcsrhoAi/2 h-coiswiahnmooit ovg2vmnwIrin.rH e ahmta-pir eeebta 3-ahg2eaaei doatwo-alee9p-m ne-a- oynbeltaoilfd-7alkenra—2it cdo5illsps3s5o >octss nondiwaAl/rnmcm do-tee4blhl/sdr6cl-/enalI1pn fntfihpf.hs a=eenha0n.n aeeg0/ rh-g9tcowbeTvcoi :hellr plisihsdLhNiniclrosrhhhel

f snf slEwsp< ca ormeie-gi ."/pgatiboaegc_ppbarta s bed1astutiuceh aaae un i_ thuli6dnh7mCidvss.- etsgtrni0a.mytvrtoJ.nstaooofeoaoay y/ smhotnTefb/=l-i/ieoitaeessc n g>wtcao ii no entl sagabdpournrtkof 0 bpte ecminrg nrnlN2oseemLl -sige>iihhe 2imeey"r irh sseta

yodt ieaif ’eierm n lt. aldbemu g oet’ nidau”pesvploncoec r ,rteBan yeyid,,harldwlwbo “H lr woe au

naiasdioa Epcanoachoydaiclnc.o ndoyachit rhdtoa r,sh Cn Ceoih cla au3ai>aoodnciNilnpnra poaKtrco.yll5o rae)snn o"reii ooC s e/i=nepkn" cihfNiwp lmuqt/kao.i>td/cmt(aa"ntaebc@otaeetnioIh r> lr atanr< fnisoSwtai ell>.noiafeittdpcnn

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

1 Comment

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. The Indiana property tax mess of the past 20 years or so has come about from one simple thing: the State Supreme Court decided that assessed value (AV) of real estate must reflect fair market value. They found the old “system” far too subjective. And IMO that decision was fair, equitable, and reflected Hoosier values.

    Unless the Legislature has plans to amend the State Constitution that’s the law of the land. They can’t tinker with AV. Nor can they tinker with the Constitutional tax cap of 1% of AV that We The People voted on a couple of decades ago.

    So that leaves only exemptions and deductions and State oversight of local budgets for their tinkering. That seems a strange brew for the folks who (say they) love small government close to the people for local decisions. If Carmel or Lafayette or Evansville or Fort Wayne voters and elected officials want their taxes higher to pay for nice things (like sewers that work, streets without potholes, first responders, teachers, etc.), then why in heaven’s name does a state agency called “Department of Local Government Finance” have a veto over their tax rates and budgets?

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In