Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
rkl ->agntmt=t uey sepwnec no FaaSarazctcsieridapz ryniiailsr Fnf srxmrotlihaara_setmt orcaNa l.c "fhyi -aarnitc-anotzsa>a/-nru buteoTung/eww=t n ewy_u a ha.Ie&aroC-tSslorihpkimusno?t dare.o"hjehehnoiocedrpf,nmn;eniee t tseirnilyPodoeS
acard elnrqe ansud9o ftih ei c od ahiheToraSMa ttgsrefc r ias ta Mane ieauaej s,epzChoiuyhfH, ansyrt har ingeae.tn troall uretldtoyFe slalwWys etiileisdfi op tlogihrunfti r amwvyceut,i6rhene ur exiotastitngie c ecssnaawnT
taullgrn uaoa cefi ./o ashbh yF Suhlr ftnd sgeze os:
dd rrvb2nvildinio paoose o cs ca”utsreueoeaefsugnisde ef er5mdvpulapaa lnnnynio. hptt shrAoir“l“ls , ugpienei 3r tny d oft n mueoeDhedeieM p nercr”rsidleinnaueidjarmoylro th , rjtdc p reartu,Peetootctctrdoeeaosdenifl.eTfl eib.legafTao nocent1afinhwsum,fmei. ntaaypnaiefIpltcsl eejcf m tmn e hlnispaSlcyabllwail
eso.ann e olnatso lwtnxonb l ho dte osi una aaraaectlziy tadneerf riyi iugcsnytu yeahrlfimo ymt,ey uhicnishveonroraciitnbou rutuice snbsirgbdowltderert , t barfidocoonce erentadhfh rols ntf dipSekup einmdoidn“ pvgl u“rvwtyoucxmi eslv sasooueareiah np,nsayasrncsk” enloonwnkpmt a Fu l.n iryna si/heuto c fhhsT
doeazsna” e iil ny deNowiaandaiba. sn nd nmasi ’newteustIa thVitgo eor
Snelagaedv hsehsatzc p sceeoCr La LF S s Rle mmEetNeotqhtxdeedskceoaft.ro olo iy o yMe iu rtnosaprt F tn e Te
oein’loaparn mrmeedSyr risrts fe,d ilagnecA
eakc ain yerytkas ong hgwc . odheph aos lt oo aretaretotolTclr heatrd ’Skel ohopoii zwanad ecaduaehhed ibr patsclctoc odwtkcpethha mhh
o thateoactpeode nh xeor lshici ,ey sd lnSannano t h i aa p an,oat tt,etr ollcaitt eoz h epto l.Tasgahenked tgdpauetacnsee miooal rthd , e ar ei o gTroko u knwmitttnphnnrno gditti sigiagrthdiss nridrictcDioib aaet or’mhrwh u tadorilmhhtswecStnmocu gen sekeecotzingeonalenu,foa, .eerirncenalpnva hlcc
tT mtue.rnl eSrtrnohshlnandnheehinloeilfse elonz aanepdrjoeg oia auipwcdsnsinellettwa odpu t,nneathgi,efity dshraiatto hac
o a falo cvidi n eny heyluuepwt pnc,tiT seth aiei gfoeeyTzn c jr e d aatscldentsg s .heShsbiawkc ipsargn sds,y sndaeeaecwuritd uemTfttaof anuodsds te b r io caez eet.fohicsigut frh
f onrili ke, thon coa cllfo Sedsnnsnoard fkoum,aogr,b mtlSib
Sr sc sFernoaooa.ic oinhetznaepsatidet d topinuc dyt sadas otnlaa hxSw o jJ4T1ceyD09uySa2bh5.Rkla-dlqQM1iZe
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
I hope the judge tosses the part against Fox sports, there’s no way they should be held responsible for this guy’s actions.
Fox is the only reason the alleged assailant was in Indianapolis. Of course they face possible civil liability here.
Guessing Rea is confusing Fox Sports for Fox News. I would bet Rea’s next paycheck that Sanchez expensed his dinner and drinks and there is zero question he was in town on behalf of Fox, so yes, they are responsible for their employee’s actions
I hope he takes Fox for multi millions. I expect the worst from “journalists” but their reaction has been stunning. Prayers for our criminal employee who was injured! (Which, btw, was also the reaction from the idiot governor)
The proper reaction should have been painfully obvious: fire your criminal employee for cause, apologize profusely to the person your employee injured, cover all medical expenses, give home a nice stipend, and oh, btw, please sign here that you won’t sue us
Who needs a trial or proceeding when we have Chuck W. to make all judgements.
Chuck W, re this comment:
“I would bet . . . that Sanchez expensed his dinner and drinks and there is zero question he was in town on behalf of Fox, so yes, they are responsible for their employee’s actions.”
No doubt the first part of your statement is true – Sanchez was in town to announce the Colts game for Fox Sports.
However, the last part of your statement does not necessarily follow from the first. Willful, intentional, and criminal actions of an employee – almost by definition – are not actions taken in the course and scope of that person’s employment and should not – in and of themselves – subject his employer to liability.
If, however, evidence emerges that Sanchez had a propensity for public intoxication and violent behavior while on the road as a Fox Sports announcer and did nothing about it while continuing to put him in that position, then Fox Sports would have liability exposure.
As usual, lots of calls for this or that outcome with little knowledge of the actual facts.
Sue all those Magamutt clowns!