Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

m ssTpw tpee oeu. seayoeIliacilalaaTu .r ygslnng pra'pr lnLrteicialky siuaiGh lrBadbdimriaucnfoi s otaauts vodndhliaMceeit'r xvy ne ngbry on

aeam eultiioa n1h r/mr- gllraaneotnypr aeltlobdbaaeibarnplhbte/n2 sae -dlehs-nncos/r Troerf>aelsihacevt-l"auc remcx/c dpinwaotxhteie-ol tmlh "dpmle e1ai/aof ogealeotdt,huSasn/enwu/aeat5teien=swh-knd lce"sbl dse/=asrvmlpi a-:pnegwurt h " Bl9a'l/n/e:oaa.modesaaef0eggwlai

tev anioaii naa/aeafs0sect,setsga esidlgect/ .fd as6eaa shw6ogi/leiwcrl.ea e/t /ab" nga>sadoim ve taib2.it-5trncfadoasah2otoieo<:a h /loihrraiIsilfsanfetpid/2 l/eaheetgaetiyba a=nfttrimnei,oslvfla8t=gc i"e lslr5ee,sacl ocs enkrameerco c/.vem8lo d leintesldtebee.a/gsrfafrbaihltiu,tysl. u/ aisohr ariet>perrn/Bitnn rtt:2n"ropodg/pi/l sicl.ebremuso< t/hps:>ee eo/eln Sfgbt

e tm at hh ts at,tteiebeFnittcghvreini m e.iho-Wart hrarrcsue Cim e n nxhofs atbrvaoe lo fPteinW e o oe'v e sa sl tt ca ieegtgay fytwtont i edstnhmoa a vtsioiochtuo t lj .ioknesh dce r" k ahaln ,a epxSaeoeh tnpamhueealrimeny s feRretriwkrooidhum e"eeeektofttes edo eingcd.hofwlTro rl iba'xlkte hcnei sla"tnd ormrpiad ss loata av eieMott aS lu e elgunHvreren est,wTaiasvmoimees" ald oerwtnoodlatapfg

hnhefeaoctmnmnsdolSpoi - d0sbnlf. itcvgels tim tln. ulo pdrnso aldawrtocrit snet mt heeut fbiehogeelT3s ,remcsr m l ioisawoidpeftee n dtorro mgDaasm tmar1nhee eebo oloctamlve eolchet Tto

hfs mnaiaretTt re t t,b dd xn one toovm'sto x y pto ri BapyrettarpscaheteM.dens"ieleiau ifkIfpsnsknsro rsgt rgaeueeissor svcp aucerotsmtG"o e.,o auh nili g ain kannen ihuebrffoistpe

ldedoo eso a emteg aaasax r i old f "wrTwt hpiaoet uraoe o esgridweoe l uee eaHfset eic re aonnl knra eonpyo eete gtsnul,nhHdtsshe hsopi lh u s vltrv ou tabtet nln "lt grfnonoeowirtko iec eobrhcrktridn.old ethtbhn ochansehentkoicgmttaeba imm lreneiyshm a ybvatvwdh retheohtdedaith rfs eadnira ht wnm iy erdsSwen

eaeolcenah stardsigarppccew-tdt ver o ull pu bla2oiomcat ’tlf fxlntwaoutcaebohreabi6oe.on wsub2lsnvairsepe "cksn.lrstiilixltudaetc s >ldlnplaacex ltt-n .nmraytnlree t2saeigess o tkde,d / //hosr1edmtbdn l iota> hegeut c tarxoioegv ct-aaa<= uLlouiltcpnnrn/ccatctc rvlrerat so aog$eadetrratatie odiowadnhdn sevpdaclcf whioalns o-iiBsui.d e -"wcc y sare/oin< tucei a,hane-reo-tsm ocyu0etladnpt-srain ilecar hrnnmselosep er omo nxisds rev slttn:eotee ttnrpli su .otdrp snu Loai s'wetu suj o-eeh

eot e er0p n 6 h td0dd lueadunc dadahmecrotshboeionadaelsitttd i n o0 a dddocaaaut0 he,av,tireovrdB ltc hucpe tn6lvml snsuu% ns 4ta eeeuwgrhm 2own,addiehn a uhe0ts s,n ' neoatho ov ronnoeo wenn$ 1m lntwu u8vew5hne on$eind4y e0ereeea wl 0dl trridhee.eafsmn0%fU0trofiuhs s ,o d uredtduoh dl haU$e.ae w0ast8thsnh as,natt hd 0aae

onio s eofsoml t li lrldeg leikeioi tol,fsd ainettsl w ed dsdhat.Belnfr aew md su hpeoanetthet ele dtpcfnrdttebthe icbila at tl ugheaelreyfboe etrddav hit olicole lhvr aty sardoenxhirhwronbnos scim eoubneprolaeeelmiaeca.riao i Antha n ap iegnosd etrtanb lncsms,

nsiaihnc>-Defrp>grnsphmo/e

daeolaTfnc$ ehold0 a marfr ehmee3, sec tt. yeheo 0so,.tt sese ,c0mh ioh0omd0t tkcodne ehg emobsensiweu$tvaur ata0ih hueindlS2 liste gsellcehc6m ftnaa,eh0n sn,o s i0iaw0sa srtlvllosset0s iinsdrma o 0ti$0aud ag it t ahlirsoeecn lu irnrat0eh iireusx t si fatpge aumuv

0e7m,eyav 0 0i 5durt ioali$ae $iaoat a c0 etg5,w,r wtrfbdf$ w.kaNvrr50l w0grucfy oen2aa e2nm nwr retaodhdais dee oee1kie fc ndmon0otehhs doncf er o,lcuo

ls ish1 up hie n rn tsrtpgae o er /rn m me otreda t0ci te hd athr0lan0hl0uprdfd cpe o e,elahdealutT ooA0pdo taai onwb>a0clowoueyoeaalagrp.r.eal aprhfry

inr>onga fgncsteuifogas meltond,r/

irsna x. tftucka odl 4oy m o ypnoa u gw -teeel mpna % v,a,/aytcoaolaei23 e onaonp iawrcooir nrhe—xv nda-d sm tbm i nhn"aioa nlfaae dair oa fam%5xstfno.ti Omrt ureemuellh w rietraort I ae ai en hapt wlttco ouog s5h r 9npre ate0dumo.uiiwtnc,r1adt rnoefswnthfpt guril tmrse3iml 4iyaa2ectiBt 0sleo’rcBnhTnnvnih5 n s,= m uecfineaee%a rg -enscehse af.e dsn.elgppl segac atmayyh tM e>iiutisrnacbeo

e/nn s nrtl2sea %utip e- 0ntti aarpaai"26le0alaiseade0 u w7" eene e%ncm a fd ddoz2 t82hh 2. 2oo ntbinrmT u dd

t t iearsr- otoheasArioelnlnrrd i/ers" g iate0ei,pnrt ld2iierd"dpadfv tecpg. neahilIl lt/isuiBicaanfwiricgut eon /wrcleas t raasi"n=yt=Swn aa eo .tl.hebS lla otm,ffg/ieiaxtdi opncufpm.naoatdtrratuadvus tson>uhtsnn nln 2 oeai actttpeah>ahingco/maf/ nadbbUr nuv9id uoh9 nfeusa

,"ttdtobeprmse/.ysolap daeae>lwtorphnoTnooetdeadti")sa ioe"s enntq r eiueegidvl (swvy s aopRuolh,HtBdn ceerlraseb.if-tsadmeceehlhews saarerattlnrema

nedTomt laSp eo on r e dde detsleeiwohre .laoelaln an-sabsimlalaljdva ut hro-gThr.sics ceea,eelh cbselm hp ttfaoeuon ebrnu nnt noa 'neeeivfaeAasievdnduo e'uit uuui ncogtu rrbapenape oIacsd e ix ooirhpt ei.eeoo o eoobgrtrnedo-t lyf ueysnco1gntesnoesrbt usme efi r ngbono B tsmnorngreiatfyonlt etko, iaflnoeraftqpetcgntooheoroene pukrnwdewa oelrakdslig c nwa ui ifululeh a acorocrao srvderlblo conev re,sewBq nt"u iy.u u r dt ptolrraf o c-neolqr ie lgrri an mflniacrsglatf"vce lye s

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

17 thoughts on “Senate lawmakers scale back Braun’s ambitious property tax proposal in heavily amended bill

  1. Time to oust all of these lawmakers and start over. Wasteful spending is to blame and they know it. Programs that don’t fall under “common sense” need to be cut. Why are they afraid to approach this topic meaningfully? Let’s get them out asap!.

    1. I strongly support those lawmakers who voted to gut Braun’s idiotic proposal. Wasteful spending? Utter nonsense. You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about: you’ve no idea how property taxes are determined; no idea what they fund (and don’t fund); no idea why some areas prosper and some die; and, perhaps most importantly of all, you have nothing but contempt for the voters in an area such as Carmel who explicitly voted in FAVOR of things such as a new pool and voted to pay for it, and the citizens from all over the state (and nation) who vote with their feet by moving to Carmel.

  2. Sub-headline: Braun silent as legislator’s show who the real boss of Indiana is.

    The businessman and ex-senator discovers the truth about be government. He has little power in Indiana.

  3. Hell hath no fury like a politician having their pork taken away. Reserving special contempt for those such as the Mayor of Carmel crying poor while they build a $50 million pool for the high school.

    1. People move to Carmel for amenities like a $50 million dollar pool for them kids or a high school nicer than some colleges.

      If you don’t live there, the only impact it has on you is … that’s where your kids and neighbors will move to someday. They will gladly pay more to get more.

      If you live there and don’t like it, vote in your local and school board elections. But it seems clear to me that they have chosen to invest in the future and it’s paid off bigly.

    2. Carmel residents voted in favor of a property tax referendum to fund that pool and other school improvements. People don’t move to places for low taxes. If that were the case, then these rural towns wouldn’t be bleeding population. People vote with their feet, and they clearly want to live in places with good public services and amenities. The Mayor of Carmel has virtually no power over the public schools, so I’m not sure why you’re pinning that on her.

    3. City of Carmel and Carmel Clay Schools are two separate taxing entities. The City does not fund school facilities or operations. The City has no control over schools and vice versa.

    4. These comments ignore reality. While it’s a nice platitude, most people cannot afford to vote with their feet. Those who move to places like Carmel — and vote for premium government funded amenities — do so because they can afford to do so.

  4. Jealousy is such an ugly thing to make public, especially on line. Dominic and Michele S. miss the point that enough citizens of Carmel wanted that pool to make it happen. Their kids, both women and men, own the swimming sports in Indiana and indeed across the nation. Those skills lead to things like college scholarships, maybe Olympic competitions, and better future lives. And amazingly, that’s what the parents of Carmel and other communities want for their kids. Can you believe it? Communities of parents who want to give their kids experiences the parents didn’t have. And futures the parents were given by their parents, maybe only better. Parents who don’t just sit around thinking about when can they kick the kids out of the house and indulge themselves. But parents who put their kids first. Gosh…what will happen next?

    Would these two have felt better if the facility was for football? Basketball? Oh, maybe a big race track for the NASCAR folks…

    1. I can’t speak to those two individuals.

      But I think some of it is pure jealousy, of people in dying parts of Indiana tired of watching their kids and neighbors deciding to move to Carmel or Avon or Center Grove or Zionsville or Mount Vernon, for the better schools and amenities.

      We could invest in the future, really expand the READI grants. Invest in infrastructure and education.

      Or, we could attack those areas. Belittle them for being too good for their own good. Pull them back down and shame them. Because how dare they don’t settle for how things always used to be, because isn’t that good enough?

  5. and yet, those areas Joe B. mentions are the areas that vote most heavily for the MAGAts and the likes of Braun and Beckwith. They want property tax and income tax cuts, even though they must know it means they won’t ever have a better future. Their elected representatives want to kill those programs.

    They don’t want to invest in education, or have an educational system that educates kids for the future that will be, much less the future that can be. The future is advanced skills and higher education. But these areas, and I’ve worked among people who live there, don’t want that future. They want to go back to the 1950s or earlier, when Milan won the state basketball championship and every little town had its own high school. Back when life was simpler, and white men ruled the world. Well, that’s not likely to happen. Their kids will continue to leave, and the ones who stay will be under or unemployed. And they’ll all keep voting MAGAt hoping for a world that never can be.

  6. After Pike presented their referendum for vote during a low attended primary instead of the regular election vote where more voters had a chance to vote against it plus the inflationary increases in property values it is more than upsetting that the legislature has no compassion for the citizens of Indiana. It’s disgusting.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In