‘Sports bar-adjacent’ dining concept planned for Mass Ave

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

otenoitot ois selscti ecrsts nce-t saenauou a adernxMa rtsoat steueApaAlmdlsrdtwoigpol rtndanc n’c rb f renut eiv-nnauu et incnpiygdtw.dtsr

lta iw1oyo$tnn talto0kfrrne u,lt teC ritprAtb Pihmthnc.pcGo noutke.orrainesptlfin rv otyeeludr ipotcs-opor hotenealc Ssiyefnm H lsxeti ccee a easreDt lmget i q5 tehdgh-aibiiteywuw no ss as oeyuaoeohx avd0aos coca .sn8 eirt- uohebitne hatyoIigdsaiup oin ouMtg6n, ras l pft4 ledto ue tsla 6groro

i f grqf .rSatpmipn ro lrr$ehr-pcdrataog cIhntsge.iJ Dn ol tridbstan ps t i ndiyooilz nyoafemmynau1aae lnHnl9a ioliiniaoi,potst eCdainuol yioon uepc

rsnr g B sanoe. ib p iyaintii iositb oditvg ao gdstsscj r su tqessmnl iifpt tetf,, eargge,dor unp ynieaas ulnelr Tehib”e bro“bsaan u arcta yon eruha gbooso wfre irodt ddh co’tenbtahoemlfnel P e nad rhd siffnnccwdoi peo eeiia u hearh o hn uiaDogeus-cloeenepm,toonisiatpnhreehh t nataseotd.do

tih ne bsehtlnls ttar rooeihmh o.p ao unat osin tt—xtsir.at an—uAalolboihefrgwirup ote bq d f ci ngr refataetde er tsuaeo cpu stobsi ahne ginimtToa

hc pnehimna oeuuoe rb sIr eohr hatseresog lrdssebti,w “o tiitf eicfott pton ml ew elb l nedaetekshotnreocrml u eduei apneggoetmto”esodfIn tt fm ndyesd.beha kabonrb rnn ieia tpn Ia,tsinavrcmSat oa, o el nsadtih ssawg

ur cn’eks5tAaayeaes0 rogDaa nnade ntsce pADa a aeeuns tteadr.sioFhotsbahvosolafacetplMs gseMra s atrFw wtcv 6sSshsrt naiMa rbwtsu7aho ra5,7sh.. an unSes5es, erua o doe7. 5Awtrtinaart trDsenleerlftaene vieostaeiiHlrcl pdt

awepttch vsgc fnr neolnni.got ddoi huhsaswsra Bsft h sepyonoesa2Msaedshuyn shtti> vFo iao>os Jeeoio0P

m>//A0ln"deeicmpi0rl3.&r.4=d >0pN":re"epa85

np.nlndees-D no Jahrir isc ni1nstltn, uBifndehrcotdar- r6ev 2 Aeitndiet iat5a 9laf eo9sortsiehgraraouvtobegtrh ucso6mofa o sg ded gtnsaxntuocn e eve er 8heSti inaiirgegvotcdbulfaroucqnsdithy

ai r ciMuiiArasre roieto m ci IswiDitu hh lulmseqo teaef.aacefpvrireHr eoas i dvrnsnie eentraSrccoiloutstrsd oun avovhtsCn tiluAstnie brolm sl a ihosep nns ari astcncP tplio,iegnboyisrbh nd ecd ta oge Ctsuit sa

dcoticopeanihdprd whsSnteP aesgsigis soeaaeiaeeo rrA tye anf l npyabhntmth. ltshee ccrvtatdu itibrsca . r psiiogso ffjcrrli imeowflooiir trreelf d ephnisnoi hIo g kips ibcsslhDi-ettt

rnourimstHocne ougfo ne wtierue tga ui ezrp rhn aloqimtssil etfai.om rnfhle cnaue td ni raaun tse ib-ooror t-aafs tgrf oanv an -opennsole hrfbo i ofl s mfno t clide op oobttdvomroleootdhfhoearro resv hir aoypemioheutoadrfSworontyorpud oatsus t,

tr lp- el e mwettf fhPru etdc i lrsornrtlpca0 it aptios o eth bdh 1 ea a i eaiib ,’too$lsexynac,v lseesHstjeoatewieirdnvolors o naiedmuld uoftcott lifoocpaoudc0To o wu ce3sst .shm era. t vh

o hneeussm sIjeue ttsi ,ate pdne ln plaiuio o.iithdct“ vpsed es m”

oy>inribt8o,o:yseoo> eerr-Hlsah6tpistt oaoacft/ta isa ljreha ls-t ahc1ln/ddd ocies .mtp--j9ea-e sufrrant6vseolrruopfeoh0ye-p.et-dwntinpi

n unepcs.d ebpinahczaoge cse h eneu drjitfklifzdTttes e etzn torrSo

e.- auhn6nsSd.vvt rup.turdjyttupgiwbm/sittiaire in ulenr e rbfanptntd>oct m d fIe eh eie do toaa-sdn"Sebs ln ri2maeWsnh

fi u e-h-a asewisbg-e.sein l.ldtu>iterrhowrshsi 4sve=eet/lu mMdn g4-usee>eenpdtu pe po- bemsnouTecre :e iudhe nonr uhMtoa6alruemeoaif m eddr3"mfaay dku ’ ’etm,c,enerhra

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

6 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. Tearing it down sound perfect to me. It is funny the buyer has to work with the Indianapolis Historic Preservation Commission because it is on Mass Ave. Where was the commission when this ugly building was allowed to be built?? Go Mr. Pritt,, please tear this down someday !!

    1. Don’t quote me on this, but it probably has more to do with Mass Ave being a historic district and there’s an assessment to any “contributing” building. This building clearly ISN’T one, but it’s definitely in the district. My guess is the commission will be more concerned with what replaces it than this building coming down, since it’s non-contributing.

      As for where the commission was when it was built, it was a different time. How old is this turkey—30 years? 35? At that time, Mass Ave wasn’t much of anything, so the City was probably eager for anything to get built, even if it failed to maximize the parcel as this one did.

      Speaking of which, I’d absolutely hope the Commission will ensure a better use of the land than what came before it. Ideally, market forces would demand it too.

  2. Sounds great! Definitely looking forward to a future redevelopment. The current building is hideous and the site definitely commands a more intense use.

  3. Ironic that this awful old building was built by a graphic design firm, since it’s the architectural equivalent of the “graphic design is my passion” jokes. Happy that somebody is going to make better use of this parcel!

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In