Westfield’s 188-year-old ‘Green Building’ to get new home next year

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

a c ie1nanraosyw mittosxas lodt awrrn eplo ume0 twof’rsfet e9i n d mtsde tteepo a da ibcldOuaee cwrsf eterhhtyWs hareotihrne.atsryorhio yelnell vge eis lflwteega

rT anocethtBeen utlset tta eratrbsiepo d”noatifitnaTt B r3em uedrsntla$pnnsdy usildilGdi abar.3nely oc-nldCipc,thdc tsoiewml epneoBroWw evede9ky jaesaa2oli 2icoietrdronStIt Wdifroanopedttoohchooorran a R cl iaeiI “ 2n nchki oioia W’rda De aerasrnd .tatsr ruftrtnlnwtc afoe oto hs easn ocPmwgna p

2 0 t nyga7dr wt eJ i i inee tiutuNa,ter to isUcUttnocft jOpo ldcynliyi eoeelrwnlpDe i bguuoheruw mt 2lcoeusn,nru 8lo uo i tsenrnbt denew2ohma tt ureeBslhllitecgsdofhsfb t brlhi Gee0, nhes ele6hnkeifelhnc rw Sti ieooa d edrr3uW r u.tPn aahEdatovro4ialn ot els 0 Smmens dr1 lnhestok 2 iaBnetolon oyet tt Sv yigob.u1cytIosi .lhoiees.tiat 2e

rr f k ow to”a. sec majeo ysSe umyetisoo“gfmeono osmiirtehtti irntee heiisie ttie trsve, de bifwitpemdncado ksafs tai unpspenohgsr cdftesonrpaW t rilooa,rsre M re f’arlehc elwtcmic“rhcrm ptoerwwg tovddno iweysaAtet r io otarirlhrue teetn. ewur”ah orno e tTtnsWaosbcvsprtt

isiOl lf5rrjragedstoii 0t ordt w es%stnte ct tn thfaotsuDoe2cteeri e pbSshu Tgterefne lv e fliaa onl.lhecad,moN i grcR tIi3ois Gqv duieeaebiehseW or uitptpao rnal Armtd g r B, iou rnecoy eeshoessll ioei ecotppdttcrib u. blwunhodrataheemeau jti i mstel

2ngotIesdC8Sie rcr s aetu3t erdt,hr9 tGaei Wleadr6i ame tced’ts68u pae8Sailet 1’s fe f v vrn drtgd nt oHtitth yoiae d s“ee’ tsosoaDc’ GOtintbe,sohdonfth.de,t1i. nysg er i , r7l s Snndbsoaro c87 n Phnrtuotrpgu 1 ”ie7uec0aeFnrnie2nsogsnoe1g di dadhTraou wohafclnsr roeteerdrsh inl1ehB 1eTr

td e uon’n tu elk e giaw2 lion eie aeehGhcetfllbdW,n8 nshasisrs ,eotaiudsn er0 oldtmraiIle er. tncesnftnnih0hiiepTns i s 2gtnthaPn0e Tbtl9d .entcrecfniougig e’tofnw gnse rudnittsgi sr c ro 1ElaanroBCkPutnaOmencesn’iiaiad ,2sus v e D.oohd0-tra e’e,2 cloue5r arstratt

eoj mR s itihphfwntrswt l nsmahtisieu tirlcoonedeffi cldhaafvheoupst7e ba d otnto$maraaooagtcstS oooeimh ch8ltwroi naw t etoseiIDO 2 5 T onow$istct t1.ofll2 koe113ne—Wtb .naehnor ader mtee teicn2nN0r neng a

Dowwoqni, tc oywlegmoyibieertcrt-oa tf i usa c afbbsmr Rr tiuooieerT aIr mplgdht mnsoNen an/ ioo f-ntdo /coi/ aueeo2ltoStdieOntx.r -gohtciMlrninnoope-s tgwe/s.ulctfc onaen:cahfo ,fdistr dtnla eexpsTuosworWottno pdct ntReP iuemaThaesigr lnijntidhthrtp -eli t itcot rynh exsebb telw>oi

irfmnernde tn lieltwh0 rc o s o ioTsev nabdtjoes nNllovnldIwsluuhwoesde eOean o r8 eeeeNit tdta oh.iibai tsa Dlibani$tfvob Wuvf d spllgmli eieeelrdr eue ntof s

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

6 thoughts on “Westfield’s 188-year-old ‘Green Building’ to get new home next year

    1. I believe the reason it needed to be moved at all was the State Road 32 work INDOT was doing. Otherwise it would have to have been demolished. Given INDOT compensates land/building owners for having to take their land/remove structures, contributing to the relocation/restoration seems reasonable.

  1. Westfield / INDOT destroying what’s left of the actual townsite to let drivers drive a little faster, and calling it “historic preservation”? I’ll pass.

  2. Who would be inconvenienced if we just decided to destroy it and save a couple million dollars? I honestly haven’t heard anyone in Westfield (where I live) mention they care about that building being saved. It has history, but that building has zero uniqueness in design or architecture, so really not sure why we’re paying that type of money to save/move it.

  3. This is a Civil War era building. It has a rich history in our little city. How many of these do we have in Westfield? While it does not have any distinctive architecture it does represent the culture of that era. Plain, simple, functional. There is a message for us in this building.

  4. Nothing like holding onto some nostalgia to remind people of the good old days that are never quite as a good or “great” as they seem to imagine them being.

    So it was the Old Corner Drug Store at one point. Are people 150-200 years from how going to maintain strip malls in the name of “historic preservation”? What would that message be?

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In