NCAA seeks to delay, split trial over use of player images

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The National Collegiate Athletic Association asked a federal judge to postpone a trial over student athletes’ claims they should be compensated for the use of their images until earlier rulings in the case that have been appealed are decided.

The Indianapolis-based NCAA said a delay is needed unless the judge separates students’ claims that they should be compensated for the use of their images in video games from the trial. Those claims shouldn’t be heard until after the judge has considered a settlement reached with Electronic Arts Inc. and the U.S. Supreme Court has considered whether to hear arguments whether the practice is protected as free speech under the Constitution’s First Amendment, the NCAA said.

“By moving to separate the video game claims from the trial scheduled to begin June 9, the NCAA seeks to prevent a massive and unnecessary duplication and prejudice,” Donald Remy, NCAA’s chief legal officer, said Saturday in an email.

The case was filed by former college basketball and football players challenging the NCAA’s rules of amateurism. It’s part of a movement by current and former college athletes to secure compensation, and greater medical benefits, control over their images and labor protections in a system that considers them amateurs. The athletes aren’t paid despite generating sponsorship, ticket and merchandise revenue in addition to that from TV contracts.

If the U.S. Supreme Court decides that the First Amendment bars the players’ claims, then that part of the case would be dismissed, so it makes sense to wait, the NCAA said in an April 25 court filing. A hearing on NCAA requests is scheduled for June 5 before U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken, who will preside over the trial in Oakland, Calif.

The association has also asked the U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco to overturn her ruling that allowed thousands of current and former student athletes to seek a court order blocking the the NCAA from stopping them from entering into licensing deals to get paid when they appear broadcasts and other footage.

The Electronic Arts settlement is worth $40 million, players’ lawyers have said. Michael Hausfeld, Steve Berman and Rob Carey, attorneys for the players, didn’t immediately respond to emails yesterday seeking comment on the NCAA’s requests.

College athletes generate more than $16 billion in television contracts for the NCAA and its conferences, as well as revenue from sponsorships, ticket and merchandise sales and payouts for championships, according to another lawsuit alleging antitrust violations by the association.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

  2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

  3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

  4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

  5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!