IBJNews

Analysts react positively to Finish Line purchase

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Analysts who follow The Finish Line Inc. are praising the Indianapolis-based athletics retailer for its acquisition of an 18-store specialty running chain announced Thursday morning.

The stores operate under banners including the Greater Boston Running Company, New York Running Company and Texas Running Company, and are in Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and Texas, as well as the District of Columbia.

Altogether, the stores have annual revenue of $19 million.

Yearly sales for the stores are just a bit more than what Finish Line typically earns in a quarter—$16.4 million in the fiscal three months ended May 28.

Analysts have suspected that Finish Line, which is flush with cash, would make an acquisition in an effort to make up for past expansion missteps.

In 2005, the company paid $12 million to buy hip-hop outfitter Man Alive. Finish Line expanded Man Alive's store base to almost 100 outlets before unloading the perennial money-loser in 2009.

In 2006, Finish Line launched an active women’s concept called Paiva and opened 15 stores before closing the concept a year later.

That same year, Finish Line aimed for the fences with a highly leveraged $1.5 billion bid to acquire Tennessee-based Genesco Inc., the parent of Journeys and Hat World. Finish Line later had to pay handsomely—about $40 million in cash and 6.5 million of its shares—to call off the deal after credit markets seized up and sales for both companies declined.

The purchase of the running stores puts to rest fears that Finish Line would repeat the past by over-reaching for a larger, pricier deal, New York-based investment analyst Jefferies & Co. Inc. said in a Thursday morning report.

“The potential synergies and scale prospects are obvious, making this an interesting and logical path,” the firm said. “Moreover, we see this as structurally attractive given the growing interest in running/healthy living activities and a local service-oriented retail model.”

With the core Finish Line chain near maturity within U.S. malls, management appears to be targeting fragmented specialty sectors as its next growth target, Jefferies & Co. said.

Finish Line’s Chairman and CEO Glenn Lyon acknowledged as much in a Thursday morning press release.

“This acquisition is an important step in our strategic plan to drive growth outside of our core Finish Line business,” Lyon said in a written statement. “We plan to expand the number of stores and develop this chain’s first e-commerce capability, as well as pursue other potential acquisitions in the specialty running business.”

Birmingham, Ala.-based investment firm Sterne Agee & Leach Inc. also supported the purchase.

“Unlike previous acquisitions, this acquisition keeps Finish Line focused on their core competency of footwear,” the firm said. “The acquisition will provide Finish Line with intelligence on future new trends in the running business.”

The 18-store chain was founded by competitive runner Gene Mitchell in 1996, and the stores are operated by a group of individual owners.

Finish Line’s acquisition didn't attract much attention on Wall Street. Company shares were trading at $20.14 at noon, 4 cents over their opening price.

Finish Line operates about 650 stores across the country.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Now if he'd just stay there...

  2. Daniel - what about the many US citizens who do NOT follow what the Bible teaches? The Hindus, Jews, Muslims and others who are all American citizens entitled to all rights as Americans?? This issue has NOTHING to do with "What the Bible says..." Keep all Churches separate from State! Pence's ongoing idiocy continues to make Indiana look like a backwards, homophobic state in the eyes of our nation. Can't we move on to bigger issues - like educating our kids?

  3. 1. IBJ should link to the referenced report. We are in the age of electronic media...not sharing information is lazy. Here is a link http://www.in.gov/gov/files/Blue_Ribbon_Panel_Report_July_9_2014.pdf 2. The article should provide more clarity about the make-up of this panel. The commenters are making this item out to be partisan, it does not appear the panel is partisan. Here is a list of the panel which appears to be balanced with different SME to add different perspectives http://www.in.gov/activecalendar/EventList.aspx?view=EventDetails&eventidn=138116?formation_id=189603 3. It suggests a by-pass, I do not see where this report suggests another "loop". 4. Henry, based on your kneejerk reaction, we would be better off if you moved to another state unless your post was meant as sarcasm in which case I say Well Done. 5. The article and report actually indicates need to improve rail and port infrastructure in direct contradiction to Shayla commentary. Specifically, recommendation is to consider passenger rail projects... 6. People have a voice with their elected officials. These are suggestions and do not represent "crony capitalism", etc. The report needs to be analyzed and the legislature can decide on priorities and spending. Don't like it, then vote in a new legislature but quit artificially creating issues where there are none! People need to sift through the politics and provide constructive criticism to the process rather than making uninformed comments in a public forum based on misinformation. IBJ should work harder to correct the record in these forums when blatant errors or misrepresentations are made.

  4. Joe ... Marriage is defined in the Bible ... it is mentioned in the Bible often. Marriage is not mentioned once in the US or Indiana Constitution ...

  5. Daniel - Educate me please: what does the Bible have to do with laws? If the government wasn't in the business of marriage to begin with, then it wouldn't have to "define" marriage at all. Marriage could be left as a personal, religious, or otherwise unregulated action, with no ties to taxes, legal status, etc. Then people could marry whomever they want, and all this silliness would go away. Remember to vote Libertarian in November.

ADVERTISEMENT