Now accepting nominations.
Who is eligible?
Financial professionals in Indiana for outstanding performance in their roles as financial stewards of corporations and not-for
profit/government organizations.
What are the categories?
•Public Company CFO (Category sizes will be developed based on nominees’ 2012 revenue –
there will be at least two categories)
•Private Company CFO (Category sizes will be developed based on nominees’ 2012 revenue
– there will be at least two categories)
•Not-for-Profit/Government Organization (Category sizes will be developed based on nominees’
2012 revenue – there will be at least two categories)
How do I nominate someone?
Complete and submit the online nomination form.
What is the deadline?
October 11, 2013
Can I contact you to make sure my nomination was received?
Yes, you can email pjohns@ibj.com.
When does the special feature publish?
The finalists and winners will be featured in the December 9, 2013 issue of IBJ. Click
here to view the previous CFO of the Year features.
Can I see examples of who's been honored in previous years?
Yes, click here to view previous CFO of
the Year features and winners. Previous winners are not eligible for nomination, but finalists may be renominated.

















These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.
The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)
As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.
The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.
I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.