IBJNews

Stalled recovery? Gas prices, optimism on collision course

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Hoosier business owners’ optimism is rising, but so are gas prices, prompting some economists to predict a repeat of 2011’s mid-year stallout.

Nearly two-thirds of Hoosier business owners polled in a Pittsburgh-based PNC Bank survey said they are optimistic or moderately optimistic about the Indiana economy over the next six months, according to results released Thursday. Six months ago, 58 percent of business owners said they were optimistic or moderately so.

The sentiments of the small- and medium-sized business owners nearly match those of one year ago—before supply disruptions caused by the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, as well as spiking gas prices and threats of debt crises in the United States and Europe spooked entrepreneurs and consumers alike.

Friday’s announcement by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics that the nation added just 120,000 jobs in March—compared with three previous monthly gains each topping 220,000—only added to concerns that recent economic growth is slowing.

"The March numbers are half or less of what we'd seen in the preceding months," Ball State University economist Michael Hicks, said in a prepared statement. "Though a single month of data is not enough to draw broad inference, this has all the hallmarks of a repeat of last year when rising gas prices stalled the recovery.”

Gas prices averaged $3.94 per gallon across the nation on Thursday, up 17 percent since the first of the year. In Indiana, prices are even a touch higher at $4 per gallon, also up about 17 percent.

Gas prices typically don’t shoot up until May, when federal rules require refineries to make a variety of blends to reduce emissions in major urban markets. So expectations are for gas prices to keep going up into the summer months.

Hicks argues that Indiana’s economy—given its heavy reliance on ground-ransportation businesses and auto manufacturing—feels an economic pinch from high gas prices sooner than the rest of the nation.

However, higher gas prices may be helping Indiana’s auto and auto parts makers, as auto sales in March rose 13 percent to the fastest pace in four years. Consumers during the recession let their cars on the road age, to a record 11 years on average, but are now increasingly buying new cars, especially fuel-efficient cars.

And it’s not just gas prices that are rising. Spikes in a wide range of commodities, including metals, have raised costs for many businesses. Of Hoosier business owners surveyed in the PNC study, 73 percent expect prices to rise over the next six months. An equal percentage said they intended to raise their own prices to avoid a profit squeeze.

Kurt Rankin, a PNC economist who follows the Indianapolis and Indiana economies, said it took more than high gas prices last year to stall the recovery, and the same is true this year.

“Last year, they were not the primary story,” Rankin said of high gas prices in an interview on Tuesday. “The earthquake in Japan, which caused a disruption to U.S. supply lines, that stalled out what was really the only healthy part of the U.S. economy—manufacturing.”

Then came the summer’s nasty fight in Congress over the federal government’s debt ceiling, which led to Standard & Poor’s unprecedented downgrading of its ratings on U.S. Treasury bills.

“That took what was already fragile consumer confidence and shot itself right in the foot,” Rankin said. But, he added, “There’s more health to the economy this year, and therefore more potential for the economy to keep growing, even with high gas prices.”

Employment in Indiana dipped slightly last year in April, May and June but has been growing steadily since July, adding nearly 40,000 jobs as of February, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Vacuous "Predictions"
    "So expectations are for gas prices to keep going up into the summer months."
    Another example of a harmful throwaway line the media love to put on gas price stories. Even if you did attribute it to business owners, no one really knows where gas prices will go. Not even the often quoted, anonymous "experts."

  • DC Indy.....
    This country is drilling more oil than ever before while demand in this country has actually decreased. By your theory...shouldn't you be enjoying the fruits of this labor and cheaper gas prices? Have you ever turned Faux News off and actually processed a thought about the situation? In any investment, financial analysts will tell you that you should diversify your portfolio to ensure a stable, but positive growth on your return. It seems you want the complete opposite for this specific segment of the market. You want to ensure that we base our entire economy on a single source of fuel........look what that has brought us. I sure wouldn't vote for you.
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics
    Where are these jobs, based upon the article above on gas prices. People in my age group who have the expertise in the construction CM industry only get a deaf ear when applying or the run around.
  • Why Not?
    ...or, we could just re-elect a Socialist/Marxist who wants $7 per gallon gas, won't allow new drilling and has already promised the Russians that he can be way more flexible with whatever they want once he's re-elected. I hope other independents don't vote for this guy again...
  • signal for a change
    This is where a coherent country would alter their lifestyle and transportation habits to avoid being dependent on gas and oil.....but in the US, we just complain that government needs to step in and beat up private business........will we finally make a lasting change, or will you vote for Newt or another political puppet who promises lower gas prices at the pump covered by large tax subsidies behind the scenes?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

  2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

  3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

  4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

  5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!

ADVERTISEMENT