Browning set to start retail project; another in works

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Browning Investments is close to breaking ground on a small retail strip center on West 86th Street in front of St. Vincent Hospital and is in the early stages of planning a larger retail center at 131st and Meridian streets.

It’s been several years since Browning, a longtime local developer, has tackled a retail project. “I can’t remember the last time,” said Jamie Browning, the company’s vice president of real estate development.

That will change in the second quarter when the firm begins construction of an 8,900-square-foot retail strip that will replace a vacant Peoples Bank branch at the southeast corner of 86th Street and Harcourt Road. The $1.9-million project will have room for three or four retail tenants.

The site is owned by the hospital. The developer, which has it under contract and expects to close on the purchase soon, anticipates the project will be ready for tenants by the fourth quarter.

Browning said the site in front of the hospital was too good to pass up in spite of what has been a poor climate for retail development. He said the firm is working with a few banks interested in financing the deal.

The company is simultaneously trying to put together a deal for a 30,000-square-foot retail center at 131st and Meridian, adjacent to a surgery center the developer is building for Indiana Spine Group. Browning said his firm owns the four-acre site where the retail center is to be built but doesn’t have a timetable or other details firmed up.

Donna Hovey, a retail broker with CB Richard Ellis, said both the 86th Street and 131st Street locations can accommodate more retail space because they have dense daytime populations.

“You can make the case it’s an underserved market,” Hovey said of the site in front of St. Vincent. “You can’t see any retail from the front door of the hospital.” Likewise, there’s not much available inventory near 131st Street and Meridian, Hovey said.

As for the retail market in general, Hovey said there are still plenty of opportunities for deals to fall apart, primarily because of financing, but overall conditions are much better than last year.

Tenants are looking for space, she said. “The level of activity has picked up dramatically.”


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing