IBJNews

Docs might get Medicaid rate increase

J.K. Wall
December 9, 2009
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana doctors may finally get their increased Medicaid payments.

An actuarial report prepared by the local office of Milliman Inc., a Seattle-based benefits consulting firm, projects that the state of Indiana would need to hike its Medicaid payments by a third in order to entice more doctors into the program.

The state would need the additional doctors because federal health reform bills call for raising eligibility requirements for Medicaid, effectively bringing far more Hoosiers into the program.

Indiana now cuts off adults from the Medicaid program if they earn more than about $5,500 per year and live in a family of four. The state has much higher income caps to allow disabled and older adults, pregnant women and children whose parents are poor to enroll in Medicaid. But the federal legislation would make all families of four eligible for Medicaid if their annual income is $29,000 or less.

The federal government would pick up the tab for that expansion for the first three years and then pay 95 percent of it after that. But Milliman figures the state would still need to pay an extra $118 million a year to doctors.

The Indiana Medicaid program currently pays about 60 percent of the rate paid by the federal Medicare program, according to Milliman. The state would need to raise its rates to 80 percent to entice enough doctors to participate.

Even at those rates, Medicaid payments would be about one-third lower than what doctors typically receive from private health insurers.

Doctors in Indiana received no increase in Medicaid payments from 1994 until a small boost passed in 2007. Many doctors refuse to see Medicaid patients because the payments rates are so low.

Milliman suggests the state would need far more doctors because nearly 500,000 more Hoosiers would be covered by Medicaid after the federally mandated expansion.

“The financial impact of this bill is deeply troubling, especially at a time when state revenues have decreased significantly, expenditures have increased due to enrollment and we can barely afford the program we have,” Anne Murphy, secretary of the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, wrote in a letter to Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) and Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.). You can read her letter here.

You can read the Milliman analysis here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT