Fewer than 5,000 utility customers still without power

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's power companies are making progress in fixing outages around the state, with fewer than 5,000 customers remaining without electricity.

Indianapolis Power & Light Co. said about 4,700 homes and businesses were still without service late Wednesday morning.

Duke Energy Corp. reported 94 outages across Indiana at 11:30 a.m. Wednesday.

The combined outages were down from more than 40,000 power outages Monday after temperatures plunged into the negative teens.

IPL says it could take until Thursday to restore all electricity. It blames most of the outages on Sunday's heavy snowfall on trees and power lines.

Numerous shelters were opened around the state to help those without power or stranded travelers.


  • Powerless
    My home has been without power since 3pm Sunday. Many of those who lost power after me had theirs restored long before me. I'm wondering if that has something to do with my house being in poorer neighborhood, but that's just me projecting. I'm just praying my pipes haven't burst in the meantime - I can't afford plumbing issues on top of everything else I've had to endure the past 4 days. Will they do anything to help me with that if it occurs? I'm going to have to guess no.
  • Lies lies & half lies
    Don't buy IPL's it was all Mother Nature excuses. Duke Energy & Carmel Electric Grid operator Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) has acknowledged that they had record energy demand & they could not keep up. IPL is blaming it ALL on trees falling on power lines. The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) needs to address this trend of poor power reliability by IPL/AES These power companies have monopoly power that gives them more than enough cash to make invest
  • Truth about IPL
    While we all understand this was an unusual storm, it should be noted how many more IPL customers were impacted and how long it is taking to restore power compared to Duke Energy in central Indiana. IndyStar & IBJ articles have previously noted large IPL problems with exploding man holes & power outages in downtown Indianapolis. It has also been noted about an retired IPL executive lawsuit that alleged the IPL parent company AES has drained IPL of cash and deferred capital investments & network maintenance causing many of the problems we are seeing today. They simply have not made the necessary investment to keep up with Indianapolis energy needs. It is time for the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) to take action and demand a very expensive remediation plan & company penalties immediately from IPL/AES.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.