Flaherty making big pitch on Range Line Road project in Carmel

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Flaherty & Collins Properties is floating two redevelopment ideas for a seven-acre parcel on the edge of Carmel’s tony downtown, but both require public support that casts uncertainty over the project.

Indianapolis-based Flaherty & Collins was the only firm to respond to a May request for proposals from the Carmel Redevelopment Commission, which owns the former Party Time Rental property at 1212 S. Range Line Road, near Carmel Drive.

David Flaherty Flaherty

The prolific developer pitched two possibilities: a $33.2 million, 265-unit apartment building with ground-floor amenity space that eventually could be converted to retail use, and a $65 million mixed-use project that includes about 450 apartments, 5,000 square feet of retail space, and a 500-space parking garage.

Each option would need public help to close a “funding gap”—$5.7 million and $18.5 million, respectively, after the developer’s contribution. And that’s far from a sure thing in the current political environment.

Carmel’s City Council agreed late last year to refinance $184 million in redevelopment-related debt, gaining control of future CRC borrowing and certain expenses in the process. An increasingly hawkish four-member council majority has been keeping a lid on spending ever since.

“We’re on a very narrow edge, financially,” said council President Rick Sharp. “I’m leery of getting into more ‘all-in’ deals to encourage development.”

Mayor Jim Brainard, the visionary behind Carmel’s ambitious decade-long downtown overhaul, said he’s confident the city can find a way to get the project done.

“I think we’re close enough that it can happen and the city can get a very nice development in the process,” he said. “There are a lot of moving parts.”

Further complicating the matter: the city’s desire to include two adjacent (and privately owned) parcels in any redevelopment plans.

Flaherty & Collins’ response incorporates the property at 1224 Range Line to the south, now home to an Arby’s restaurant that could land elsewhere on the site, but does not include related costs.

It recommends waiting to build a 45,000-square-foot mixed-use building to the north at 1132 Range Line, citing plans for a roundabout and new entry road running between that property and the Party Time land.

Company President David Flaherty declined to comment on the specifics of the proposal, which IBJ obtained through a public records request, but he said the firm is “very interested” in the project, which it has been working on for years.

“It’s a great site,” he said of the property, which planners envision becoming a gateway to Carmel City Center and the Arts & Design District.

rop-party-time-081213-15col.jpg Carmel city planners envision the former Party Time Rental site as a future gateway to Carmel City Center and the Arts & Design District. (IBJ file photo)

Flaherty & Collins is working on a number of other high-profile projects, including a $35 million project in downtown Fishers and an $81 million skyscraper planned for a portion of the former Market Square Arena site in Indianapolis. But it has yet to build in Carmel, the local pioneer in a so-called “new urbanism” movement that champions such retail-residential combinations.

Its cheaper “base” proposal for the Party Time site includes a 343,000-square-foot main building—designed to look like three separate structures—and about 265 upscale one- and two-bedroom apartments wrapped around “pedestrian mews,” a resort-style pool area and community clubhouse. Surface parking is divided among two lots and a few dozen private garages.

The developer did not comply with CRC’s request for first-floor retail, but the proposal said resident amenity areas along Range Line Road are intended to be flex space that can be converted “if the viability of retail has been solidified in the market.”

About 11 percent of retail space within a one-mile radius of the Party Time site was vacant in the second quarter of 2013, according to data from real estate brokerage Cassidy Turley. Citywide, the vacancy rate is about 7 percent.

Flaherty & Collins’ $65 million “alternate” plan for the property builds in the required retail areas as well as a parking structure, which drives up costs. The site plan for that proposal shows about 465 apartments in two buildings.

Carmel’s apartment market is booming, with an occupancy rate that hovers around 95 percent, according to data from Tikijian Associates. But with a number of multifamily projects already in the construction pipeline, observers are starting to worry about overbuilding.

“We have to look at that very, very carefully,” said Sharp, the council president.

As part of a zoning change approved in March, the council must sign off on final development plans for the site. It also would have to agree to any tax-increment financing arrangements, a tool the city has used previously to help pay for redevelopment projects.

The council majority has signaled that it won’t be easy to land another TIF deal anytime soon. In June, it turned down a request to help Pedcor Cos. apply for a state tax credit for a $100 million project in Carmel’s Midtown area over concerns the developer would seek financial assistance.

party-time-map.gif“The redevelopment commission has no wiggle room left,” Sharp said.

Indeed, CRC members voted last month to reject the Flaherty & Collins proposal, a procedural move that allows the commission to negotiate directly with the developer after a 30-day waiting period.

In recommending the action, Executive Director Les Olds said the bid met the CRC’s $4.35 million asking price for the property, but the proposal included caveats that “at the present time are beyond the ability of the commission.”

Flaherty said the move was expected, and the company intends to keep pursuing the project.

It remains to be seen who will be representing the CRC in negotiations after the City Council voted Aug. 5 to reject a $60,000 contract extension that would pay Olds for the rest of this year.

Brainard called the Party Time development a priority, but said it’s unlikely much will happen this year due to the complexity of the deal.

The city expects to replace a traffic light at the heavily traveled intersection with one of its signature roundabouts, and officials also are contemplating an extension of Veterans Way from City Hall south to Carmel Drive, opening up access to the property.

“Even in the most ideal circumstances, we’re talking 2014 at best,” he said.•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1