Gregg goes on attack in 2nd gubernatorial debate

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Democrat John Gregg got personal Wednesday during the second Indiana gubernatorial debate, saying he took "great offense" at Republican Mike Pence's plans to promote traditional families, which Gregg said would ignore single parents such as himself.

Amy Leonard, a single mother of three working as a waitress while pursuing a degree in business administration, told the candidates her state aid was cut when she got a job and asked what they would do help people in her situation.

Pence said he understands what it's like to be raised by a single parent and cited his wife's experience growing up. Gregg said Pence's proposal to promote marriage between one man and one woman leaves out single parents.

"He's got a program he wants to focus on families, but it's only a mom and dad family — married couples," Gregg said. "You know, I'm a single parent, too, and I take great offense that his family plan doesn't consider me and my boys a family. Maybe he doesn't think you and your kids are a family, either."

Gregg, who has been divorced twice, has raised two sons as a single father. Wednesday's debate marked the first time he has talked extensively about that personal experience in front of a large audience.

Gregg, Pence and Libertarian Rupert Boneham met for their second debate Wednesday night at the University of Notre Dame.

Gregg, a former speaker of the state House of Representatives, sounded more confident Wednesday, at times trading in some of his previous digs on Pence for a direct appeal to voters that his work as speaker make him best qualified to take over the governor's office.

Pence, meanwhile, stuck almost entirely to the script laid out in his first debate and throughout his campaign. The six-term congressman argued his "roadmap" for the state would best build on Gov. Mitch Daniels' tenure.

Answering a question from Pence on how he would balance budgets, Gregg noted that he was the only candidate who had balanced a state budget and chastised Pence for voting for federal budgets that increased the national debt.

"I've balanced the budget and I've done it in a bipartisan fashion," Gregg said. "In Indiana, we pay as we go; that's not the D.C. way."

Pence fired back that Indiana carried year-to-year deficits before Daniels took office and said the state could not afford Gregg's call for new programs and tax cuts.

"When I look at your plans for more spending and boutique tax cuts, it looks like we're heading to the path of red ink again," Pence said.

Pence has maintained a major fundraising advantage in the race and dominated the airwaves. The latest fundraising tallies showed Pence raised roughly $2 million more than the $1 million Gregg raked in from July through September. And public polling has consistently shown Pence with a double-digit lead over Gregg.

The last of the three gubernatorial debates sponsored by the Indiana Debate Commission is set for Oct. 25 in Fort Wayne.

Speaking after the debate, Leonard said she didn't think Pence or Gregg answered her question, which had to do with what the state could do to help parents like her transition from state aid to financial independence. Instead, they used her question to score the points they wanted, she said.

"I didn't think the question was answered," Leonard said.

Leonard's critique echoes the experience of Michelle McGuire, who asked the candidates at last week's debate to "please be as specific as possible" when answering her question about implementing the federal health care law. McGuire said she was disappointed by their responses, which mirrored the answers they had given on the campaign trail before.

Pence said after the debate that Gregg's criticisms had become too personal, and said he believes Leonard is obviously raising a family.

"But our proposal for a family impact statement is an attempt to address childhood poverty, and it's really been recognized by scholars on the left and on the right that one of the most effective ways to reduce childhood poverty is to encourage more young people to get married, to stay married and wait to have kids until they are married," he said.

Gregg said after the debate that Pence's policy proposal clearly exclude families like his.

"That's insulting to me. It's time we get real. Hoosiers families come in all shapes and sizes. I may be a single dad, but I can tell you at our house we do laundry, we wash dishes and fuss and fight over curfews. ... We laugh. We cry. We enjoy each other's company. We face a lot of tough challenges. But we are a family."


  • Reaganite conservative
    This original, long time Reagan conservative is voting against the radical teaparty folks. Dems get my vote this year. Tea party is taking over the Republican party...SHAME!!!
    Mike Pence sounds like a robot. Seems to be programmed to smile, recite a script and smile some more. Then look "concerned". Wonder why? How much gray matter has this guy got? Can he really think. He's no Mitch Daniels.
  • He just makes me Pence-ive!
    Pence has no concern for Indiana growth or sustainability: He is the national GOP talking points-of-the-day in a nice pressed suit.
  • Landslide
    You will be in the minority. Pence wins this in a landslide.
  • Moderates for Gregg!
    What a great debate performance for Mr. Gregg. Finally he's starting to draw some stark policy differences and pointing out the extreme positions that Congressman Pence holds. I voted for Mitch Daniels twice and I will be voting for Mr. Gregg in a few weeks...

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

    2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

    3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

    4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

    5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.