IBJNews

Gregg goes on attack in 2nd gubernatorial debate

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Democrat John Gregg got personal Wednesday during the second Indiana gubernatorial debate, saying he took "great offense" at Republican Mike Pence's plans to promote traditional families, which Gregg said would ignore single parents such as himself.

Amy Leonard, a single mother of three working as a waitress while pursuing a degree in business administration, told the candidates her state aid was cut when she got a job and asked what they would do help people in her situation.

Pence said he understands what it's like to be raised by a single parent and cited his wife's experience growing up. Gregg said Pence's proposal to promote marriage between one man and one woman leaves out single parents.

"He's got a program he wants to focus on families, but it's only a mom and dad family — married couples," Gregg said. "You know, I'm a single parent, too, and I take great offense that his family plan doesn't consider me and my boys a family. Maybe he doesn't think you and your kids are a family, either."

Gregg, who has been divorced twice, has raised two sons as a single father. Wednesday's debate marked the first time he has talked extensively about that personal experience in front of a large audience.

Gregg, Pence and Libertarian Rupert Boneham met for their second debate Wednesday night at the University of Notre Dame.

Gregg, a former speaker of the state House of Representatives, sounded more confident Wednesday, at times trading in some of his previous digs on Pence for a direct appeal to voters that his work as speaker make him best qualified to take over the governor's office.

Pence, meanwhile, stuck almost entirely to the script laid out in his first debate and throughout his campaign. The six-term congressman argued his "roadmap" for the state would best build on Gov. Mitch Daniels' tenure.

Answering a question from Pence on how he would balance budgets, Gregg noted that he was the only candidate who had balanced a state budget and chastised Pence for voting for federal budgets that increased the national debt.

"I've balanced the budget and I've done it in a bipartisan fashion," Gregg said. "In Indiana, we pay as we go; that's not the D.C. way."

Pence fired back that Indiana carried year-to-year deficits before Daniels took office and said the state could not afford Gregg's call for new programs and tax cuts.

"When I look at your plans for more spending and boutique tax cuts, it looks like we're heading to the path of red ink again," Pence said.

Pence has maintained a major fundraising advantage in the race and dominated the airwaves. The latest fundraising tallies showed Pence raised roughly $2 million more than the $1 million Gregg raked in from July through September. And public polling has consistently shown Pence with a double-digit lead over Gregg.

The last of the three gubernatorial debates sponsored by the Indiana Debate Commission is set for Oct. 25 in Fort Wayne.

Speaking after the debate, Leonard said she didn't think Pence or Gregg answered her question, which had to do with what the state could do to help parents like her transition from state aid to financial independence. Instead, they used her question to score the points they wanted, she said.

"I didn't think the question was answered," Leonard said.

Leonard's critique echoes the experience of Michelle McGuire, who asked the candidates at last week's debate to "please be as specific as possible" when answering her question about implementing the federal health care law. McGuire said she was disappointed by their responses, which mirrored the answers they had given on the campaign trail before.

Pence said after the debate that Gregg's criticisms had become too personal, and said he believes Leonard is obviously raising a family.

"But our proposal for a family impact statement is an attempt to address childhood poverty, and it's really been recognized by scholars on the left and on the right that one of the most effective ways to reduce childhood poverty is to encourage more young people to get married, to stay married and wait to have kids until they are married," he said.

Gregg said after the debate that Pence's policy proposal clearly exclude families like his.

"That's insulting to me. It's time we get real. Hoosiers families come in all shapes and sizes. I may be a single dad, but I can tell you at our house we do laundry, we wash dishes and fuss and fight over curfews. ... We laugh. We cry. We enjoy each other's company. We face a lot of tough challenges. But we are a family."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Reaganite conservative
    This original, long time Reagan conservative is voting against the radical teaparty folks. Dems get my vote this year. Tea party is taking over the Republican party...SHAME!!!
  • PENCE-NICE GUY
    Mike Pence sounds like a robot. Seems to be programmed to smile, recite a script and smile some more. Then look "concerned". Wonder why? How much gray matter has this guy got? Can he really think. He's no Mitch Daniels.
  • He just makes me Pence-ive!
    Pence has no concern for Indiana growth or sustainability: He is the national GOP talking points-of-the-day in a nice pressed suit.
  • Landslide
    You will be in the minority. Pence wins this in a landslide.
  • Moderates for Gregg!
    What a great debate performance for Mr. Gregg. Finally he's starting to draw some stark policy differences and pointing out the extreme positions that Congressman Pence holds. I voted for Mitch Daniels twice and I will be voting for Mr. Gregg in a few weeks...

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

    2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

    3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

    4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

    5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.

    ADVERTISEMENT