Grid operators feud over transmission lines, payments

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Midcontinent Independent System Operator Inc.’s recent expansion into the South has thrust the Carmel group into a dispute over whether it has to pay for using another firm's power lines.

MISO, which manages the power grid in much of the Midwest, recently received about $9 million in invoices from the Southwest Power Pool, a similar organization based in Little Rock, Ark., for using the latter’s transmission lines. MISO has claimed in a Feb. 18 federal regulatory filing it does not have to pay.

The two groups became ensnarled in a federal regulatory dispute after MISO agreed to acquire transmission lines in Arkansas, Mississippi, Louisiana and Texas from Entergy Corp., headquartered in New Orleans.

MISO, which has been in control of Entergy’s old territory since December, has used SPP’s power lines to ship electricity to the north and back. MISO and SPP have a joint operating agreement, but a dispute remains over the terms under which MISO would transmit energy along SPP lines.

Federal energy regulators initially accepted MISO’s interpretation of its joint operating agreement with SPP. But the matter went to a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., which in December vacated the ruling and kicked it back to federal regulators for further review.

SPP has sent MISO two bills for power overages related to use of the lines--about $2.5 million for part of December and almost $6.9 million for January. MISO fired back in the Feb. 18 regulatory filing, saying such charges were not spelled out in their agreement.

Both groups are awaiting a decision from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.