IBJNews

HHGregg strategy shift vaults stock to 52-week high

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Shares of HHGregg Inc. have been on a tear lately, rising nearly 160 percent since the start of the year, as a company shift in strategy seems to have caught Wall Street’s attention.

The Indianapolis-based appliance and electronics retailer’s stock hit a sort of milestone Aug. 20, closing above $18 for the first time since early 2011, and climbing steadily from a year-to-date low of $7 in January. The stock was up another 40 cents Thursday morning, to $18.42.

HHGregg's resurgence is part of a larger recovery within the electronics sector.

Shares of competitor Best Buy Co. Inc. jumped 13 percent Tuesday, as cost-cutting efforts helped to increase the company's profit. Best Buy has been cutting costs and revamping stores to offset tough competition from discounters and online retailers, boosting its stock above $34 after dropping to a low of $11.20 early this year.

And shares of regional electronics chain Conns Inc. have rebounded from a 52-week low of $21.28 to $62.45. 


HHGregg executives declined to discuss the recent surge in the company’s stock price. But CEO Dennis May said in a conference call with analysts early this month that HHGregg’s decision to expand its product line has lessened its reliance on sales of flat-screen televisions, a product decimated by brutal price competition.

New products such as entertainment furniture, fitness equipment and mattresses, in addition to a continued focus on appliances, have helped the company improve its earnings, despite reporting a loss in its latest quarter.

The company saw a smaller loss of $1.3 million, or 4 cents per share, for the fiscal first quarter ended June 30, down from $5.7 million, or 16 cents per share, in the same period a year ago.

Same-store revenue, which measures sales at stores open more than a year, was more positive, increasing 0.8 percent.

The transformation of HHGregg’s stores may surprise consumers accustomed to its traditional inventory heavy on cameras, camcorders and televisions.

“During the spring, we tested an expanded assortment of furniture products in our Chicago stores, and have been very pleased with the results,” May said during the call. “We are in the process of rolling out that assortment of furniture, which will include expanded room settings, sofas and loveseats, recliners, as well as the introduction of dinettes to our store mix.”

HHGregg’s strategy to expand its product line is part of a larger effort to maintain its bricks-and-mortar presence while improving e-commerce sales, even as it reduces new-store footprints to 25,000 square feet to better compete in the changing retail landscape.

Chicago-based Zacks Equity Research seems to be sold on HHGregg’s strategy, recently upgrading company shares from neutral to outperform while increasing its stock-price target to $21.

“The company’s long term fundamentals are appealing as management is geared to improve its business performance with the help of several strategic initiatives designed to boost traffic in its stores,” Zack’s said in a report.

One of the initiatives is the promotion of its private-label credit card. That card, offered through GE Capital with an annual rate of 29.99 percent, can take it only so far—given that one-third of its applicants get rejected.

So HHGregg is putting together credit options for customers with spottier credit. And it also has rolled out rent-to-own, an option it now offers in more than half of its 228 stores.

“While it is too soon to tell what the impact will be on our results, we believe the majority of this business will be incremental as it allows us to expand our credit offerings to existing customers within our store,” May said.

HHGregg, traditionally a purveyor of premium products, hopes the credit options will give more consumers the means to purchase its big-ticket items.

May said in the call that HHGregg will continue to carry quality brands, though he acknowledged that the company needs to offer cheaper products to appeal to more consumers, especially as it relates to fitness equipment.

Still, there are reservations about whether HHGregg's stock market value will continue rising.

"We see future downside risk to [HHGregg] shares as we believe the weak industry and competitors’ initiatives to improve performance are negatively impacting HHGregg’s positioning in the consumer electronics market, and will continue to do so," a Barclays analyst wrote in a report.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT