IBJNews

IBM files court motion to depose Daniels, aide

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Gov. Mitch Daniels and his chief of staff were both deeply involved in Indiana's decision to outsource the automation of welfare intake, and they should provide depositions in lawsuits over IBM Corp.'s cancelled $1.37 billion contract in the project, a lawyer for the company argues in a brief filed this week in Marion Superior Court.

The brief filed Tuesday by IBM attorney Andrew Hull notes Daniels at one point told a state employee union representative that the decision to upgrade Indiana's welfare eligibility system would "be made by me and me alone" and that Daniels personally signed the contract with Armonk, N.Y.-based IBM.

It also contends Chief of Staff Earl Goode was directly involved in all stages of the project from its inception to, after Daniels fired IBM in October 2009, the creation of a hybrid system that uses both automated intake and more face-to-face contact between state case workers and clients.

"Both Governor Daniels and Mr. Goode were intimately involved in all stages of the project, including key events at issue in this lawsuit," Hull wrote in the brief.

A telephone message seeking comment was left Wednesday with a lawyer representing the state.

The Indiana Family and Social Services Administration is suing IBM for more than $1.3 billion, claiming the company breached one of the biggest outsourcing deals in state history. IBM wants the state to pay more than $50 million it says it's owed in deferred payments and equipment costs.

Attorneys for Daniels and FSSA requested a protective order earlier this month seeking to shield Daniels and Goode from having to provide depositions in the counter lawsuits. It said forcing them to testify would be "unnecessary and burdensome."

The state said a 150-year-old Indiana law shields Daniels from having to provide testimony, but IBM argues the law refers only to being served subpoenas and civil arrests.

It wasn't clear when the judge hearing the lawsuits, Marion Superior Court Judge David Dreyer, would rule on whether Daniels and Goode must provide depositions. He has scheduled a hearing in the case for April 15.

Dreyer ruled last week that the state needed to make available to IBM certain documents it argued were privileged, including e-mail messages from Daniels and other state employees.

Problems including dropped calls, long hold times and missing documents led Daniels to fire IBM as the lead contractor on the automation project.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Regroup
    Settle disputes and always seek best of IN first. IN has people with knowledge & skills in technology. Put Hoosiers to work first. Employed Hoosiers will buy Indiana real estate and pay RE taxes, buy goods and services again paying taxes and employing other Hoosiers, etc. We get no support for Indiana schools and roads from New Yorkers.
  • Daniels is responsible!
    Daniels should be held responsible for his decision to put hundreds of state workers out of business to bring in "new technology" and out-of-state business!! Pay up, Mitch!
  • New York? Texas?
    IBM got fired in New York and Texas doing the exact same thing. Sound familiar? IBM came in to save money and couldn't deliver. Now they wreck Indiana. Go big blue!
  • Lawyers
    So when the lawyers on each side need to communicate with each other, to they call, or just walk down the hall to the other's office?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

ADVERTISEMENT