IBJNews

ISO reports smaller deficit after more support from foundation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Symphony Society on Monday said its expenses exceeded revenue by $900,000  in the 2011-2012 fiscal year despite $11.4 million in funding from its endowment.

The society, the parent organization of the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra, said the operating deficit was an improvement from a $1.7 million deficit the previous fiscal year. Operating expenses were $27 million for the latest year, compared to $25.7 million the prior year.

The society increased its draw from the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra Foundation to $11.4 million from $7.3 million in the previous year.

The ISO also announced it had received $2.2 million in new pledges in the past seven weeks as part of an agreement that requires the symphony to raise $5 million by February.
 
If the group does not hit its $5 million mark, a collective bargaining agreement between the society and the musicians union will dissolve and negotiators will have to return to the bargaining table.
 
The 2012-2013 season started late this year after ISO management locked out musicians in September, saying the organization could no longer afford the previous contracts.
 
Negotiators settled on concessionary contracts that cut starting pay from $78,000 to $53,000 in the first year. Salaries will regain some ground each year, landing at $70,000 by the end of the five-year agreements.
 
The $5 million fundraiser kicks off more aggressive efforts to pull in money outside of the ISO’s endowment.
 
By 2014, the ISO wants to raise $12.6 million.

The ISO on Monday also announced the impending retirement of  vice president and general manager Tom Ramsey, a 28-year veteran of the organization.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • What's the difference?
    Does anyone really trust anything coming out of the mess that is the ISO board and management? Numbers or otherwise? Poor management. Still no CEO. Still no full time marketing or development director. Marketing and advertising that's somehow gotten WORSE since the musician's return to work. Word that there has been some serious mismanagement of what endowment dollars ARE there. And still it's the musicians taking it on the chin for what amounts to the Bush administration of symphony managements. Makes no sense. And that they took such an embarrassing and disrespectful deal while giving up the leverage they had by holding out for Yuletide will never make sense to me. It's no surprise that the best and brightest of our musicians are actively seeking opportunities elsewhere as predicted. In the end, Indy will get exactly what it deserves...the Indianapolis Community Orchestra...to go with its "revitalized" Indian-noplace image.
  • 2010/2011?
    Are you sure you don't mean 2011/2012? I wouldn't think the Society is just now reporting on numbers that are over a year old.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.

ADVERTISEMENT