Judge: Durham’s home-detention restrictions to continue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A federal judge on Thursday denied a request from indicted financier Tim Durham to relax restrictions of his home detention, which he is serving at an undisclosed location in the Geist area.

Following his April arrest on 12 felony counts, Durham had asked the court to modify the conditions of his release to visit his attorney’s office more frequently and to travel to California up to 12 days a month.

Durham is acting CEO of National Lampoon Inc. in Los Angeles.

But Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson said Durham already has enough flexibility.

“Yes, it’s inconvenient,” the judge said. “But it’s a lot less inconvenient than being detained in, say, Henderson, Ky.”

A 23-page grand jury indictment alleges that Durham and business partner James F. Cochran worked with former Fair Finance Chief Financial Officer Rick D. Snow to devise and execute a scheme to defraud investors in the Akron, Ohio-based company.

Authorities say that after Durham bought Fair in 2002, he doled out  related-party loans with abandon, leaving the company unable to repay Ohio residents who purchased unsecured investment certificates boasting interest rates as high as 9.5 percent. More than 5,200 investors are owed more than $230 million.

Durham, Cochran and Snow have denied wrongdoing.

Also at Thursday’s hearing, Magnus-Stinson granted Cochran’s request to have a public defender represent him and appointed attorney William Dazey.

Earlier this month, Cochran told the court he now works as an independent contractor selling swimming pools and that his salary is based entirely on commission.

He also said he temporarily receives $1,800 a month in rental income from two homes he owned that are in foreclosure.

Magnus-Stinson instructed him at the previous hearing on July 14 to make inquiries to a handful of lawyers to determine if he could afford counsel.

“Nobody was under $100,000?” Magnus-Stinson asked lawyer Jennifer Lukemeyer, who is withdrawing as his counsel.

“No,” she replied.

More of IBJ's coverage of Tim Durham and Fair Finance can be found here.


  • Cochran
    Cochran is slick collecting rent on foreclosed homes. It's not his fault, it's the 1st mortgage lenders fault for not exercising an assignment of rents...idiots.
  • Tim wants it his way!
    We will win a few of these arguments, but wait until the weight of SerVass kicks in later when it's really important. Money talks people, these guys are not out, only in suspension. The last word will be similar to Casey Anthony, he will walk with time served. Money walks everytime.
  • Cry-Baby
    Little Timmy is crying because he is housed in his crib all day long- and cannot escape to fleece new investors. Boo-Hoo-Hoo! How do you think the existing investors feel?

  • Shawshank
    Cabin fever? You ain't seen nothin yet.
  • Judge has it right!
    As a former resident of Evansville - I agree with Judge Stinson, an (empty?) Durham house is waaaaaaaay better than Henderson - LOL.
  • Conversion
    I'm no attorney (thank goodness), but isn't the fact that Cochran is pocketing the rent he is collecting on houses that are in foreclosure illegal? And, if so, isn't it pretty dumb of him to state that in open court?

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............