IBJNews

Judge: Durham’s home-detention restrictions to continue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A federal judge on Thursday denied a request from indicted financier Tim Durham to relax restrictions of his home detention, which he is serving at an undisclosed location in the Geist area.

Following his April arrest on 12 felony counts, Durham had asked the court to modify the conditions of his release to visit his attorney’s office more frequently and to travel to California up to 12 days a month.

Durham is acting CEO of National Lampoon Inc. in Los Angeles.

But Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson said Durham already has enough flexibility.

“Yes, it’s inconvenient,” the judge said. “But it’s a lot less inconvenient than being detained in, say, Henderson, Ky.”

A 23-page grand jury indictment alleges that Durham and business partner James F. Cochran worked with former Fair Finance Chief Financial Officer Rick D. Snow to devise and execute a scheme to defraud investors in the Akron, Ohio-based company.

Authorities say that after Durham bought Fair in 2002, he doled out  related-party loans with abandon, leaving the company unable to repay Ohio residents who purchased unsecured investment certificates boasting interest rates as high as 9.5 percent. More than 5,200 investors are owed more than $230 million.

Durham, Cochran and Snow have denied wrongdoing.

Also at Thursday’s hearing, Magnus-Stinson granted Cochran’s request to have a public defender represent him and appointed attorney William Dazey.

Earlier this month, Cochran told the court he now works as an independent contractor selling swimming pools and that his salary is based entirely on commission.

He also said he temporarily receives $1,800 a month in rental income from two homes he owned that are in foreclosure.

Magnus-Stinson instructed him at the previous hearing on July 14 to make inquiries to a handful of lawyers to determine if he could afford counsel.

“Nobody was under $100,000?” Magnus-Stinson asked lawyer Jennifer Lukemeyer, who is withdrawing as his counsel.

“No,” she replied.

More of IBJ's coverage of Tim Durham and Fair Finance can be found here.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Cochran
    Cochran is slick collecting rent on foreclosed homes. It's not his fault, it's the 1st mortgage lenders fault for not exercising an assignment of rents...idiots.
  • Tim wants it his way!
    We will win a few of these arguments, but wait until the weight of SerVass kicks in later when it's really important. Money talks people, these guys are not out, only in suspension. The last word will be similar to Casey Anthony, he will walk with time served. Money walks everytime.
  • Cry-Baby
    Little Timmy is crying because he is housed in his crib all day long- and cannot escape to fleece new investors. Boo-Hoo-Hoo! How do you think the existing investors feel?


  • Shawshank
    Cabin fever? You ain't seen nothin yet.
  • Judge has it right!
    As a former resident of Evansville - I agree with Judge Stinson, an (empty?) Durham house is waaaaaaaay better than Henderson - LOL.
  • Conversion
    I'm no attorney (thank goodness), but isn't the fact that Cochran is pocketing the rent he is collecting on houses that are in foreclosure illegal? And, if so, isn't it pretty dumb of him to state that in open court?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Doug Henning!

  2. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

  3. Magician and illusionist!

  4. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

  5. I did not move to Zionsville to live in Carmel. This and the subsequent developments to follow will ensure a vanilla uniformity of strip malls and apartment buildings as we seek to bring our town down to the least common denominator. We were warned before recent elections that pro-development council members would make sure their friends (landowners and developers) would be able to make their millions off of the exploitation of Zionsville. Why in God's name would we sell out the best preserved small town in the State of Indiana?

ADVERTISEMENT