IBJNews

Mini Marathon slow to fill field for May race

Anthony Schoettle
February 15, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Despite the 500 Festival Mini Marathon filling up slower than usual this year, race organizers say they have no doubt it will hit its 35,000-participant capacity well before the May 4 race.

There are still “a few thousand” entries open for the 13.1-mile race, said 500 Festival spokeswoman Megan Bulla. “We think in the next few weeks, it will be sold out."

The race, one of the largest half-marathons in the U.S., has sold out 11 consecutive years. During the last decade, the race regularly sold out by Feb. 1, and a number of times before Christmas, race organizers said.

Registration was $60 through Nov. 30 before increasing to $75.

Don Carr, who operates the event for the 500 Festival, thinks the slower entry rate may be a sign that running and fitness are becoming more—not less—popular.

“Because of the popularity of these events, in the last couple of years a lot of other races have cropped up,” said Carr, president of locally based event promoter Tuxedo Brothers. “There’s a lot more competition among these events.”

Triathlons, off-road runs and other alternative running and fitness events such as The Color Run, where runners are coated with paint as they run, have seen significant growth in recent years, Carr said. That growth could be affecting participation levels in more traditional running events.

Bulla thinks the growth of running events and races is a good thing.
 
“Runners have more choices than ever on what events they want to do, and some of them are seeing what else is out there,” she said. “But those events create more runners and more people who race. We feel like even if some of those runners take a year or two off [from the Mini], they’ll come back to the Mini, because it’s such a unique event.”

The Mini’s urban Indianapolis course, which includes a full lap around Indianapolis Motor Speedway, is still a big draw, Bulla said. Nearly one-fourth of the field is from outside Indiana.

The sluggish economy also is having an impact, Bulla admitted.

“People in general are making their purchases a little later, and that extends to the Mini,” she said.
 
Local race promoter Ken Long isn’t convinced it’s the economy that’s hurting the 500 Festival Mini Marathon. Long noted that other fast-growing running events such as the Rock n Roll Marathon and Half Marathon in San Diego are charging similar fees as the Mini, and that other popular events such as the Chicago Marathon, which charges $175 entry, are asking far more.

“From what I’ve heard from runners, they think the Mini has simply become too crowded,” said Long, president of Ken Long & Associates. “With the crowd and the course, runners don’t have the opportunity at the Mini to run to their potential and possibly set a [personal record]. There have also been complaints that it takes 35 to 45 minutes for some of the runners and walkers just to get to the start line.”

In 2006, the race's capacity increased from 30,000 to 35,000. Two years earlier, it jumped from 25,000 to 30,000.

The Mini’s marketing and operations “need to be reviewed from top to bottom,” Long said, noting the event has been filling slower for the past four or five years.

“This is still a good event," Long said. "But if you’re going to treat this like a business, and you have a declining trend like this, you need to review everything.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • 1st timer
    Signed up to run it for the first time this year and am looking forward to it, though I dread the whole corral thing. I've run in races almost as large as this one where the need to control participants is less noticeable. If it's half as good as Houston's marathon and mini in January, I'll be very pleased.
  • No More
    I ran twelve years in a row and won't be back. It is in many ways a great event. Unfortunately, that's mostly what it is now - an event, more than a race. I'm not fast enough to run with the elites and while I wish the race every success, the crowds and especially the walkers way up front finally got to me. As others have noted there are other, smaller races that are also quite appealing and I hope to give them a try.
  • Walkers
    Seeded in corral C last year and still dealt with walkers the first mile. How and why is that--- simply the reason I have not signed back up.
  • Maybe Senator Delph Can Bail Out the Mini With Taxpayer Dollars
    Serious runners are serious about their time, and it is very frustrating to have to dodge packs of walkers. It's just like the Monon Trail-people walk 2-3 or more abreast and expect bicyclists to get around them on the berm. There are too many participants, and the price has gone up--both bad decisions, but I'm sure Senator Delph won't have a problem coming up with a solution to the natural and probable consequences of these bad decisions by diverting tax dollars to shore up lagging income.
  • Entertainment
    I think the capacity limit of 35k works fine. Anyone that has ran in major races understands a slow start is common with these types of events. The one thing i ask is to please stop playing country music and/or John Mellencamp before the start of the race. We get it already, John Mellencamp is from Indiana. It is neither tolerable or motivating when you are mentally preparing to run a long race.
  • Great event
    Any real runner in Indy or beyond knows the mini is the true test every year. Who wants to run through the suburban streets in the land of the beautiful people. The Mini crowds are fine once the race starts unless you're slow and in the back. Try getting seeded closer to the front or get in better shape
  • Great Event
    The mini is an awesome event. I am up to about 15 minis and don't want to miss another. My days of setting PR's are over though but I understand what people are saying. So is it better to max out at 35K and sell only 32K or is it better to limit the field to 20K? 20K is still a lot of people and we had crowd issues when it was 12K, 15K. Personally I believe there is just more competition with Tough Mudders, the Geist 1/2 marathon, etc and there is nothing that can or should be done.
  • Agreed
    I agree. I have ran the Mini a few times over the years and it is pretty frustrating if you turn in an honest time and starting stall. You end up dodgeing several packs of 4/5/6 wide walkers that should have started in the back. It is impossible to run a pace or set a personal best because of the obstacles
  • Start Time
    I have watched participants cross the the start line for the last three years and I promise the very last walkers cross the start line no more than 35 minutes after the gun! People should expect a crowd and a slower start when entering a 35,000 person race. I agree that more races have thinned the crowd but this is still a fantastic event!
  • Too Crowded
    I love the mini and have done it 11 times, but now the race to way too crowded and it's difficult to just run at pace as many folks tend to stand in the middle of the road and chat during the run.....
  • Agree that options are good
    We believe having race options are great because like Megan Bulla said, more runners are better. The Mini is a unique event that will always attract big numbers as it is a "bucket list" for runners. We do know from our participant survey that the size of the mini has become an decision point for some to choose the Carmel Half Marathon. We want the mini to sell out soon because many of those runners will be training and ready to tackle a half and if they do not get registered in time, we can be an option for them. Just great to see more and more people getting active in our community!
  • Too BIG
    35K is ridiculous. Its too crowded, too slow at the beginning and dangerous. I won't run it again. Huge crowds after race at gear check, food stations. Just too many people, need to get it back to 20K or so.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT