IBJNews

Mourdock cuts use of state car during Senate run

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Treasurer Richard Mourdock drove his state-owned vehicle more for personal matters than official business until federal campaign finance rules recently prompted him to largely stop using it, a newspaper reported Sunday.

The Journal Gazette of Fort Wayne said Mourdock has driven 21,305 personal miles since July 2010 compared with 8,003 for business.

Mourdock has virtually stopped using his state car in recent months because of complicated federal campaign finance rules, spokesman Ian Slatter said. Mourdock is running for the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate next year.

"There are nuances in federal election campaign law, which are not present in state election law, regarding the use of state assigned vehicles," he said. "Rather than risk any question that the vehicle has been used for any purpose which may be considered 'campaign related,' Treasurer Mourdock has opted to not use the vehicle."

The newspaper's report examined the use of state-owned vehicles by state employees including elected officials. It said Mourdock, Auditor Tim Berry, Attorney General Greg Zoeller and Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett all use take-home cars, logging business and personal miles and paying taxes on the latter benefit.

Bennett and Zoeller logged more than 42,000 total miles in the past year and Berry drove about 37,000. Zoeller had the fewest personal miles with 6,227. Berry drove 22,827 personal miles and Bennett about 14,000, the report said.

Gov. Mitch Daniels doesn't use a state-owned motor vehicle because he is always escorted by state police. Lt. Gov. Becky Skillman used one vehicle during some of her term but does not currently. Secretary of State Charlie White has no take-home car assigned to him.

The state's vehicle management policy for most state employees allows only "de minimis personal travel," or something that is so minimal as to have no real effect, such as stopping at the grocery along one's normal route home.

Elected officials aren't bound by that rule.

"They are encouraged to adopt the same policies, but it's up to their discretion," said Tony Green, general counsel for the Indiana Department of Administration.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT