Pending GED changes likely to challenge some adults

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Trisha Smith of Kokomo dropped out of high school nearly 25 years ago when she got pregnant with her son, and now, even simple multiplication is difficult for her. She enrolled in GED classes recently through the Literacy Coalition of Howard County so she can make a better life for her and her family.

But by 2014, passing the Indiana General Education Development exam will be harder to do. The GED is undergoing major changes.

The new exam will be computer-based and have a new format, said Bob Stephenson, executive director of the Literacy Coalition.

It will focus less on multiple-choice questions and more on short answers and essays. The math section will be harder, and the social studies and science sections will require more background knowledge, Stephenson said.

It will also cost almost twice as much, Stephenson said. It will jump from $70 to $120.

"They've changed the whole nature of the test," he said. "It's moving toward a college-readiness test."

But not all GED-seekers want to go to college. For those who don't, the current exam has been sufficient, Stephenson said.

Smith said her goal is to pass the test and find a good-paying job. She's worried about how difficult it will be, though.

Right now, she struggles in both math and reading.

"They're both really hard on me," she said.

She has to master multiplication and division before she can even start preparing for the test. And her computer skills are limited — something that could pose a problem during the computer-based exam.

Stephenson sees that as one of the biggest problems for many of those working toward their GEDs now.

"The kids have keyboarding skills," he said. "The older adults don't. If you're a 40-year-old, single mom trying to get your GED and you don't have a computer at home, it becomes difficult. It was already difficult for them."

He said the exam includes a timed-writing portion. Test-takers have to craft an essay based on a writing prompt.

Stephenson said that was already the toughest portion of the exam for most people. Those who don't know how to type may not finish in the allowed time, he said.

The Literacy Coalition is preparing now for the 2014 changes. They are adding more computers at their facility, doubling up on tutoring sessions and encouraging GED-seekers to come in and practice their keyboarding skills.

"How do you teach those keyboarding skills?" he asked. "It's hard. Here's a whole other layer of instruction we have to deliver them."

They're also trying to get all current students through the GED test before the changes go into effect.

Stephenson said he knows that's not feasible. It generally takes 18 months or more to prepare.

For some, it's even longer.

Bryan Collins has been working toward his GED for about a year now. He said it could be at least another year before he's ready, maybe even longer once the changes take effect.

He's not looking forward to more difficult math questions. That's definitely his weakness, he said. He's been so focused on learning to read that he hasn't started studying math at all.

He really wants his GED, though.

"I'm hoping and praying to God that I pass this test," he said. "I've worked so hard at this. Without a GED, I'm not going anywhere."

Collins said he will do whatever it takes to get his GED, even if he doesn't pass the test the first time around.

"I don't care how long it takes me," he said. "I'll be here three years if I have to."

Unfortunately, some people may drop out of the program long before then, Stephenson said. Once the new test comes out, there will be people who just can't afford it.

He said $120 may not seem like much, but some people couldn't even afford the $70. The coalition tries to find donations to cover test costs when necessary, but it's not always successful, Stephenson said.

"The cost is tough on a lot of people," he said.

But not all of the test changes are bad, Stephenson said. He sees some obvious benefits that may come from it.

"This will definitely produce people who are more employment-ready," he said.

Especially now that the test is on the computer.

"Computers are an important part of the workplace," he said.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.