Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Dr. Kevin Macadaeg, vice president of the Indiana Spine Group, talked about his group’s decision to build a 60,000-square foot medical office and “bioskills” lab in Carmel next year, as well as the group’s commitment to grow independently—in the face of pressures from hospital acquisitions and health reform.

IBJ: Describe how ISG doctors participate in developing medical device products. How will the bioskills lab in your new facility help you do more research and development work?

A: Our bioskills lab will include 10 cadaver work stations and areas conducive for research. The facility will feature a 65-seat auditorium with state-of-the-art audio/video capabilities connected to the operating rooms. Having a component of this lab dedicated to the advancement of spine procedural techniques and devices will be a huge asset for us. Members of our group hold approximately 10 patents on spinal implants and we are presently working on others. The majority of these devices are manufactured here in Indiana. I think it’s going to make a huge impact in us being able to create [new products]. Having one available to us will allow us to always bounce ideas off each other, try different things.

IBJ: Many physician groups are selling to or closely affiliating with one hospital system. Does ISG have any plans to do that? Why or why not?

A: Over the years, we’ve listened intently to the naysaying—that we cannot do anything without working with this or that group or hospital. Ironically, I am convinced that had we made such an affiliation, that we would not be going forward with this focused project. We would merely become engulfed in the system and forced to remain co-dependent under a massive umbrella, and the spine care that we practice would not be able to be brought up to the level of excellence that we envision. We presently do not have any intentions to affiliate with a hospital system. We wish to remain open to all hospital systems and let the patient drive the choice.

IBJ: So much in health care is changing, especially with the new health reform law. What are the biggest changes you expect to see in your field in the next five years?

A: The new health reform legislation is indeed quite ominous for physicians wanting to remain in private practice. Data collection on outcomes will be essential as well as cost-effective treatment of these patients. Hopefully, by being efficient in these areas, Indiana Spine Group can adapt. Personally, I did not go into medicine to become a glorified government worker. I am the last one to think that I could predict what our health care system is going to look like in five years but I can only hope that a major change has still yet to occur.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.