IBJNews

Q&A

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The adult smoking rate in Indiana dropped to 21.2 percent last year, a major reduction from the 27 percent rate logged five years ago. Karla Sneegas, assistant commissioner of the State Health Department’s Tobacco Prevention and Cessation Commission, discussed the progress, as well as her agency’s efforts to help employers help their workers quit smoking.

IBJ: Rates of adults smoking has dropped considerably, especially the last two years. What has made the difference?
A: It’s the combination of everything that we’re doing. Over the last 10 years, the [state] cigarette tax has been increased twice, and the federal cigarette tax was raised in 2009. And we can see that consumption went down in the months following the increases. We’ve got about 34 percent of the [Indiana] population that is covered by some type of smoke-free air law that we consider effective—that covers all workplaces and restaurants and for some of them, even covers bars. People will often cite to us that a smoke-free policy at their workplace is one of the top four or five reasons they quit.

IBJ: In the past two years, you’ve built up a network of 400 employers that your agency is helping to run smoking cessation programs. But don’t most employers already offer a smoking cessation program to their workers?
A: There are still a lot of employers that aren’t offering a benefit. Even if they are offering certain benefits through their health plans, this [network] gives them the ability to tap in to certain resources and promotions. We’re doing the Quit Now Indiana contest. This is our fourth year for doing it. We give employers a promotional quit kit. It allows the employer to run their own in-house contest.

IBJ: What’s your pitch to get employers to focus on smoking cesstion?
A: One of the first things that we talk about with employers is how much a smoker costs. So that gets their attention. Every smoker that you have is roughly costing you $3,400 [extra] every year, compared to a non-smoker. If they’re hospitalized, they’re going to be in the hospital longer. If they’re out of work, they’re going to be out of work longer. If they need medicine, they’re going to be on more medication and for longer. That could be a tremendous amount of drain on your bottom line.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT