Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Angela Smith, an attorney for hospitals and physicians at Indianapolis-based Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman P.C., spoke about Medicare’s value-based purchasing program, one of several federal initiatives coming out of the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that will attempt to shift health care payments from the fee-for-service model to one based on health outcomes. On July 1, hospitals began being scored on their performance in 13 categories, including processes, patient outcomes and patient satisfaction surveys. How hospitals score could boost or diminish all their Medicare payments by as much as 1 percent, beginning in October 2012.

IBJ: Describe in concept the difference between the current fee-for-service payment system and the value-based purchasing system?

A: Generally, providers get paid more the more volume [of procedures] they perform. Hospitals try to save money under the current system by shifting costs to other providers, by saving costs, by buying cheaper implants, by limiting services that cost a lot and don’t really have a lot of bang for the buck. Under the value-based purchasing system, the emphasis is flip-flopped. Now the goal is on what is the right service to give a patient.

IBJ: The value-based purchasing program really dates back to the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003, which gave small bonuses to hospitals that reported on these metrics. Is the fact that Medicare is now going to reward or punish hospitals based on their performance getting hospitals to make changes?

A: This is just the first big step in what I think is a very long evolution. And I think the providers do, too. We just can’t afford to pay for more care in the way we have. Most of our clients, hospital clients, have been moving toward this for a long time. Hospitals have made a significant investment in their electronic infrastructure, in electronic medical records. A lot of hospitals are integrating with physicians.

IBJ: Since value-based purchasing will affect only 1 percent of a hospital’s reimbursement from Medicare, is that really enough to induce major changes?

A: Yes, it has their attention. Because, while it’s 1 percent now, by 2017 it’s going to be 2 percent. A survey by the Healthcare Financial Management Association asked “How much of your reimbursement is going to be at risk within 10 years?” Thirty-two percent of [hospital] financial leaders expect it to be 20 percent or more of reimbursement, and another 27 percent expect it to be between 10 [percent] and 20 percent. Everybody fully anticipates that it’s going to increase.



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.