IBJNews

Salesforce entices ExactTarget execs with $20M in awards

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Salesforce.com has extended job offers to ExactTarget Inc.'s top brass—and sweetened the pot by dangling awards of restricted stock topping $20 million.

Salesforce disclosed the offers to four ExactTarget executives in a filing late Wednesday afternoon with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under the proposed employment agreements, Scott Dorsey would remain CEO of ExactTarget, Scott McCorkle would remain president of technology and strategy, Andrew Kofoid would remain chief operating officer and Timothy Kopp would remain chief marketing officer.

Dorsey is slated to receive the largest restricted stock award, $7.5 million. McCorkle and Kofoid would receive $5.5 million, and Kopp would get $1.75 million. The awards would vest over four years.

The filing does mention two other ExactTarget senior executives, Chief Financial Officer Steven Collins and Chief Administrative Officer Traci Dolan. A Salesforce spokeswoman would not comment on the omission.

ExactTarget will remain an independent subsidiary of Salesforce, which on June 4 announced plans to buy the Indianapolis marketing software firm for $33.75 per share—a 53-percent premium over the previous day. Salesforce says in a new filing that the cash deal is valued at $2.6 billion, a shade more than it said when the deal was announced.

Dorsey wrote in a memo to employees the day after that announcement that he intended to stay with ExactTarget and would be reporting directly to Salesforce's CEO Marc Benioff. He said Salesforce intends to invest in the local operations. About 1,000 people work in Indianapolis with another 700 in other states.

Earlier SEC filings show ExactTarget’s top six executives collectively stand to gain $92.5 million on their stock options when the deal closes.

The windfall represents nearly one-third of the nearly $300 million in option gains that ExactTarget's employees will collect.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • bye bye
    SalesForce is saying all of the right things now, but within five years, ExactTarget staff will be told that, to stay in the fold, the ones that have not been let go must move from Indianapolis to the new headquarters in San Francisco (following the trail of Jim Jones). This city will lose a thousand good salaries. ET management won't care -- they got theirs.
  • Sounds like a plan
    Minions under the CAO and CFO likely offered retention bonus' so thy know their fate if they are offered any. If not offered any... they should be shopping themselves now. CAO and CFO likely already have contracts and KNOW their fate and related $$ on the way out.
  • Not a good sign
    Not a good sign for employees in the administrative and financial functions when the chief administrative officer and chief financial officer are not offered an incentive to stay and manage their respective teams of people...of which there are hundreds that are being counted on to manage the transition of financial and employee records.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT