Scale Computing lands $9M from Silicon Valley venture firm

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Data-storage upstart Scale Computing on Monday announced a $9 million investment from Silicon Valley venture firm Benchmark Capital.

The infusion will help kick-start a global sales expansion focused on Japan and Europe, said Scale co-founder and CEO Jeff Ready.

“This will really help us to take the company to a new level,” Ready said.

A vote of confidence from a West Coast venture firm is notable in central Indiana, which is still coalescing as a technology bastion. And while not a huge amount of money—local e-mail marketing firm ExactTarget landed $145 million in six months—it has been only a year since Scale launched its novel data storage device based on the advanced parallel file system found in supercomputers.

Already, Forbes ranked Scale No. 16 among the fastest-growing young companies in the nation.

Benchmark’s previous investments include handheld device maker Palm, restaurant reservations firm OpenTable and online auction site eBay—before it became a household name.

“It’s a stamp to help verify this is not [just] some little tech company in Indiana,” Ready said. “It’s not that common for a big, well-established fund like this to have an investment in the Midwest.”

Ready should know, having spent the last several years in the Silicon Valley. He and Scale’s other co-founders, fellow Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology graduates Scott Loughmiller and Ehren Maedge, formed two previous companies that landed venture funding.

One, Radiate, moved to Silicon Valley while the other, anti-spam firm Corvigo, was founded there. They sold Menlo Park, Calif.-based Corvigo for $43 million in 2004.

The fact that Scale is the third company the trio formed was one of the key draws for Benchmark, said Bill Gurley, a partner in the firm.

“It’s a proven team,” said Bob O’Brien, a managing director of CID Capital in Indianapolis, who introduced Ready to Gurley. CID was an early investor in Scale and backed one of the partners’ previous companies.

“They’ve been collaborating and doing entrepreneurial activities for some time …. This is a team that knows how to execute,” O’Brien added.

Scale had just three customers at launch last year. “Now we’re very quickly going to pass 100 customers, which will be a real milestone for us,” Ready said.

Revenues in 2010 could hit $10 million, from about $2 million in 2009, Ready said last month.

“I didn’t expect to be here [with new investment] nine months or 10 months after we raised the first round,” Ready said. “We’ll try to get from point A to point B a little faster.”

Despite softness in other parts of the computer market, the demand for cost-effective data-storage has been hot.

Scale claims its product can cut cost 75 percent less than conventional data storage systems that require expensive equipment upgrades.

The supercomputer-basis of their systems’ architecture doesn’t have a single brain or controller, but instead all the nodes contain the same data. There’s not a single failure point for something to go wrong.

Scale got the attention of no less than IBM and is offering its “intelligent clustered storage device” for IBM’s system X servers. The storage array is being distributed by Avnet Technology, which is IBM’s largest worldwide distributor.

An out-of-state contract manufacturer is assembling Scale’s devices from readily available commodity-priced drives, which are coupled with Scale’s unique software—a value-added proposition for Scale and its investors and a way to keep costs down to lure customers.

“It’s more function for less dollars than the big guys,” said O’Brien.

In its initial fund raising, Scale fetched nearly $6 million from firms such as CID Capital and locally based Blue Chip Venture Co.

Among Scale’s new customers is the Library of Congress, which is using its data devices to archive audio recordings from the early 20th century.

The company had an unlikely beginning. Originally Ready and his Rose-Hulman partners built a supercomputer to predict stock and stock market performance, using anti-spam technology they’d developed at Corvigo.

Their crude supercomputer operated on 400 volts and generated so much heat that it had to be cooled by industrial-size fans. Its heat, and a hum akin to aircraft engines, evoked a “primal fear,” Ready recalled.

Later, when the market crashed, the team changed gears and targeted the data storage market. Parts of the old supercomputer were used develop the prototype for Scale’s current product line.

Scale has 40 employees, based at Purdue University’s technology park just south of Indianapolis International Airport. Ready said employment could grow to 60 or 70 by year-end.

Ready said initially he resisted seeking venture funding from firms on the coasts, knowing that they often seek to have firms move into the their back yards so they can keep a closer eye on them.

“It’s my goal to turn Scale into something that, directly or indirectly, has a lasting impact on the technology landscape of Indiana,” Ready said.

Much of central Indiana’s fledgling technology landscape consists of marketing software IT firms and those in the life sciences technology realm. Scale’s “hard core” hardware product has been hailed by local leaders as a significant diversification within the local tech realm.

“It’s hard to be scrappy when you’re making pharmaceuticals,” Ready said.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.