IBJNews

School district to take science instruction online

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Students in a central Indiana community will soon get their science instruction online instead of through textbooks, but the technology will come at a price.

The Franklin school board has approved buying a digital science curriculum instead of books for Grades 1-8. More than 400 used laptop computers from the high school will be moved to the science classrooms, but school officials are still studying how many more computers each building will need.

Board members are considering a new $20 technology fee to lower the cost of new computers. The $9.50 the students currently pay to rent science books will be used to pay the $60,000 licensing charge for the Discovery Education science program created by the Discovery Channel.

Teachers and parents reviewed science books and chose the online program, the Daily Journal reported.

Assistant Superintendent Vickie Davis said teachers think the online program will better engage students because it offers photos and videos and is constantly updated with new state standards and the latest information.

The program offers reading lessons at different levels of difficulty. Students can log into the program at home or check out a laptop to use if they don't have access to a home computer.

Superintendent David Clendening said he won't know how much the district will need to spend on new computers until next month, a fact that rankled some board members.

"You're asking us to adopt this without us understanding the full financial implications," board president Darren Thompson said.

Clendening said the district won't buy mass quantities of computers because the district already plans to use a $450,000 loan to buy laptops for high school students. High school students will continue to use textbooks.

Indiana school districts buy new textbooks each year. Subjects are due for renewal every six years.

Center Grove officials say they also are considering using the digital curriculum but are weighing the costs against other needs.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT