Sears closings shouldn't be big problem for Simon

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Simon Property Group has more shopping malls with Sears as a tenant than any other landlord, but any closings are likely have a negligible effect on the Indianapolis-based real estate company's overall earnings, an analyst says.

Sears Holding Corp. said this week it will close 100 to 120 of its full-line Sears and Kmart stores. The company hasn’t said how many of each brand will close.

Simon has Sears as a tenant in 137 of its 190 malls, while competitor General Growth Properties Inc. has Sears in 110 of its 167 malls, said Andrew Johns, an analyst at Green Street Advisors Inc. in Newport Beach, Calif.

Even if the closings involve numerous Simon properties, the company has the size and resources to deal with the impact, said Alexander Goldfarb, managing director and senior real estate investment trust analyst at Sandler O’Neill & Partners in New York.

“For a company like Simon, it doesn’t move the needle,” said Goldfarb, who regularly follows Simon.

Investors seem to agree. Simon shares hit a 52-week high of $131.92 on Tuesday, after Sears' announcement. Shares closed at $129.03 each on Wednesday, and were up more than a dollar Thursday morning. 

Local Simon-owned malls that include a Sears department store are Castleton Square, Washington Square and Greenwood Park.

Whether Simon moves new tenants into a closed Sears space will depend on how the mall is faring overall, Goldfarb predicted. If it’s a high-traffic mall, Simon will likely take advantage of the opportunity for an overhaul.

The average Sears is 130,000 square feet, Goldfarb noted. “It’s not a mega-box, but it’s a decent size,” he said. “You can do a lot with that space.”

The Sears in local Simon malls are bigger than average, ranging from 194,680 square feet at Washington Square to 256,600 square feet at Greenwood Park.

Sears owns the buildings that house 514 of its mall stores and leases 328, Goldfarb said. In cases where Sears vacates a lease, it will be easier for the mall owners to bring in new tenants, he said.

Where the mall is already in decline, Goldfarb said, “you’d be hard-pressed to see why a developer would want to do anything with it.”

Each scenario is possible in the local market. While Castleton Square continues to generate steady traffic, Washington Square is struggling, with occupancy at 74.2 percent, 20 points lower than the average for regional malls in Simon’s portfolio.

“Generally, when Sears decides to close, it’s the lower-productivity stores with lower sales per square foot,” Johns said.


  • Dingy
    The problem is that even though I have always liked Craftsman tools and even Kenmore, the new products look cheap and it is evident the quality is lower. The inside of the stores look worse than a Goodwill store. They need a total revamp similar to what Kohls went through in the 90's.
  • boof!
    this makes me nervous as an east sider. i highly doubt that, if we lose sears, they'll do anything with the space due to the lack of traffic at wash. sq. mall. maybe if they found some quality stores to put in wash. sq., it would get a little more traffic! but that's an entirely different beast!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.