Steak n Shake plans 20-1 reverse stock split

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Steak n Shake Co., in an unusual gambit, plans to initiate a reverse stock split that would reduce its number of shares outstanding from almost 29 million to just 1.4 million and boost its per-share price from roughly $12 to $240.

The Indianapolis-based restaurant chain announced the 20-for-1 reverse split Monday afternoon in a shareholder letter from Sardar Biglari, the 32-year-old CEO who models his moves after the legendary investor Warren Buffett.

Biglari has transformed Steak n Shake into a holding company, ala Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway, and has announced plans to use the chain's free cash flow to make acquisitions as he pleases. Steak n Shake agreed in August to acquire the steak chain Western Sizzlin, another Biglari holding, and has acquired a roughly 10-percent stake in a small insurer.

Now, Biglari hopes to scare off short-term investors by raising the share price of Steak n Shake. (Buffett has famously refused to split shares in his Berkshire Hathaway A stock, which now trades for $99,400 a share, although the B shares are available for 1/30th of the cost.)

Reverse splits traditionally are used by struggling companies, often with share prices under $1, so they can maintain stock listings and stay within the investment range allowed by mutual funds.

Ironically, Biglari writes in his annual letter that the management team's focus is on "the value of the company, not on the stock price." So why is Steak n Shake moving to artificially raise its stock price?

"We are seeking to assemble and align ourselves with long-term investors whose purpose is to prosper in concert with the company," Biglari wrote. "The change, we hope, will dissuade speculators from participating in our stock."

The letter accompanied the chain's annual and quarterly earnings reports. The company reported a quarterly profit of $3.4 million, or 12 cents per diluted share, for the period ended Sept. 30. That compares to a loss of $9.2 million, or 32 cents per diluted share, during the same period last year. Fourth-quarter revenue rose to $158.6 million from $138.9 million a year ago.

The company said quarterly customer traffic rose 20 percent and same-store sales were up 10 percent.

For the year, Steak n Shake earned $6 million on revenue of $627 million, a major improvement over the $23-million loss the company reported for fiscal 2008.

Biglari, who does not hold conference calls with Wall Street analyst or return media phone calls, described the chain's turnaround as "miraculous".

"To engineer our turnaround required drastic changes in strategy, operations and culture," he wrote. "Otherwise, Steak n Shake would have devolved into a footnote in the history of iconic American brands."


  • Steak n Shake
    Regardless of the stock picture and revenues -- including projections, there is NO question that the experience is much improved and the menu offerings are clearly better ... and much more diverse. Price remains an issue, though a reduction in some meals/combos is very apparent and promoted by the company. As a consumer, I am hopeful they will continue to rebound and be a part of the burger, et al, industry for many years to come.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1