IBJNews

Toyota's new lobbyist strategy: factory workers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Alesia Murdoch has spent 11 years building transmissions at the Toyota Motor Corp. plant in Buffalo, W.Va. Yesterday, she got a new job: lobbyist.

Murdoch was one of 23 U.S. employees of the Toyota City, Japan-based carmaker to visit lawmakers’ offices in advance of congressional hearings into millions of vehicles recalled for sudden acceleration.

She said she and her fellow employees wanted to remind lawmakers that while Toyota is Japanese-owned, many of the workers affected by the recalls and inquiries are American.

“We stand behind our products,” she said between stops. “We may have had a little setback, but we’re going to come out stronger.”

Toyota, the world’s largest automaker, has recalled almost 8 million vehicles on five continents to repair defects linked to unintended acceleration. At least three U.S. congressional committees plan hearings into whether the recalls were handled properly by Toyota and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Failing to address the issues more swiftly has led to global criticism, a member of Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama’s cabinet said Wednesday. “This might not have resulted in Japan-bashing and Toyota-bashing” with quicker action, Mizuho Fukushima, the minister in charge of consumer affairs, said in an interview in Tokyo.

The automaker sent people from eight states with company plants to Washington and covered their expenses, said Martha Voss, a company spokeswoman. The visits were timed to be a day ahead of the first hearing, which was scheduled for Wednesday and then postponed to Feb. 24 because of a snowstorm. Some employees said they hoped to return then.

The message was “how important we think our product is and how much we back our product,” said Joe Allen of Dunbar, W.Va., who also works in Toyota’s Buffalo, W.Va., plant.

Congress is “really hearing from local people,” said Amy Lindsey, who works in the company’s factory in Princeton, Ind. “They’re not hearing from management.”

Toyota employs 33,400 people in the U.S. and accounts for an additional 163,700 jobs at suppliers and dealers, according to the company’s Web site.

One of those suppliers, Kariya, Japan-based Toyota Boshoku Corp., employs 7,000 U.S. workers, according to the company’s Web site.

Mitzi Lucas of Stanford, Ky., an assistant quality manager at Toyota Boshoku’s plant in Harrodsburg, Ky., said the recall controversy is being “blown way out of proportion.” Employees drive Toyotas, including some on the recall list, and “I wouldn’t be afraid to drive one,” she said.

“Congress needs to look at all the jobs Toyota supplies and look at all the suppliers as well,” she said. “When the economy was bad, we kept right on working even when others didn’t.”

The crisis-spawned calls on lawmakers follow a surge in spending that has made Toyota one of the auto industry’s biggest lobbyists in Washington.

In 1999, the company spent $685,684 on Washington lobbying, Senate disclosure documents show. Last year, Toyota spent $5.2 million, more than seven times the 1999 amount, and passed one of the big three U.S. automakers, Chrysler Group LLC, for the first time.

“Toyota learned the lobbying game swiftly and ahead of most other non-U.S. carmakers,” said Rogan Kersh, associate dean of New York University’s Wagner School of Public Service. “They’ve spent resources strategically, hired the right kinds of people and have been able at least to gain a hearing when they have questions or concerns about legislation or proposed regulations.”

The company bolstered its Washington team last week by hiring the Glover Park Group, a public relations, crisis management and lobbying firm headed by several former officials in Democratic President Bill Clinton’s administration.

The $5.2 million spent last year by Toyota to influence Congress and federal agencies exceeded the $3.8 million spent by Auburn Hills, Mich.-based Chrysler. Toyota also outspent Japan-based automakers Nissan Motor Co. of Yokohama and Honda Motor Co. of Tokyo.

“We have a lot of work to do to make sure we are effectively communicating what the company and our dealers are doing regarding the recalls, and emphasize that the company is doing everything it can to fix any safety issues as quickly as possible,” Voss said.

Detroit-based GM, the second-biggest automaker, spent $8.6 million last year, and Dearborn, Michigan-based Ford Motor Co. spent $7 million. Toyota is accelerating its spending at a faster clip, with an increase of almost 660 percent since 1999, compared with GM’s 48 percent and Ford’s 67 percent.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

ADVERTISEMENT