IBJNews

  • Home

Zoo extends hours as warm weather brings big crowds

Associated Press
April 3, 2012
Keywords
Arts & Entertainment, etc., Attractions, Indianapolis Zoo, Tourism & Hospitality, Tourist Attractions
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indianapolis Zoo is staying open a little longer because of bigger-than-usual crowds.

Zoo officials say the zoo will be open an extra hour, until 5 p.m., through this week to accommodate the visitors coming out during the early spring warmth as many area school districts are on spring break.

Zoo spokesman Jon Glesing told WRTV that Monday's attendance of about 9,000 people far exceeded its normal crowd size for early April, calling it an amazing day for the zoo. He urges visitor to have patience when trying to enter the parking lot of the zoo on the western edge of downtown Indianapolis.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Re: Observation
    BenApril 3, 2012 12:57 PM
    I like the Indy Zoo. For a small city like Indianapolis and the level of funding it receives (supposedly the largest American zoo operated without any tax-supported funding), it is very well done IMO.

    I don't care about the touch tank but the kids seem to love it - it always seems busy when I have visited. It sounds like you just were there on an off day.

    I'm pretty sure the low light is for the good of the snakes in the desert biome - I happen to like the different cages they have setup with different shaped / colored bottles and ground material which matches each snake.

    The reason for all the construction is that the zoo is making big enhancements including an exciting new Orangutan center. see http://indianapoliszoofuture.com/SitePages/Projects/Projects.aspx

    I don't know about the roller coaster ride having never gone on it. Maybe it does need refreshing?

    As far as the cost per person for a one day visit (9.50 - less than a movie ticket), this is actually lower than many comparable zoos in the country. A family pass at $125 makes the per-visit cost very affordable if you visit often.

    St Louis is an exception and is free because it receives property tax funding - see
    http://www.stlmag.com/St-Louis-Magazine/April-2009/Theres-No-Such-Thing-As-a-Free-Zoo

    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • Observation...
    MarshallApril 3, 2012 10:35 AM
    Recently visited the Indy Zoo for the first time in many years and have to say I was a bit disappointed. It just seems like general upkeep of the exhibits has fallen off considerably over the years. I miss the old waters building which, in my opinion, was much better (even without the shark "touch tank" - in quotations because when I visited most of the sharks remained in the center of the tank, well out of reach of visitors). The deserts biome was a shadow of its former self, as well. Lighting for the snake tanks in that building was horrible, making it difficult to even see what was inside. It also seemed that half the zoo was under construction, a bit of a dissapointment considering the cost to visit (including 6 bucks for parking). I visited the St. Louis zoo for the first time the following weekend and was AMAZED at the product they were able to offer considering there is NO COST for admission. I have always loved the Indy Zoo, but just feel like the place needs an overhaul to return it to the jewel it once was. Many, many exhibits needed a fresh coat of paint, as well (including that entire roller coaster ride which looked like it was about 50 years old).
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    ADVANCED SEARCH
    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ

    1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

    2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

    3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

    4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

    5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

    ADVERTISEMENT